Longitudinal changes in college math students’ implicit theories of intelligence
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This study examined changes over time in implicit theories of intelligence and their relationships to help-seeking and academic performance. College algebra students completed questionnaires during the second week of classes and 2 weeks before the end of the semester (ns = 159 and 145, respectively; 61 students completed questionnaires at both waves). The questionnaires assessed entity and incremental implicit theories of general and math intelligence (beginning and end of semester) and help-seeking (end of semester). Results indicated that students had more incremental views of general than math intelligence. Further, their views became less incremental over the course of the semester; however, this decrease was greater for math than for general intelligence. Participants who exhibited a stronger incremental theory of general intelligence at the beginning of the semester subsequently reported greater help-seeking during the semester. Finally, students who had more entitative views of math intelligence earned lower course grades.
- Ahmavaara A., Houston D. M. (2007) The effects of selective schooling and self-concept on adolescents’ academic aspiration: An examination of Dweck’s self-theory. British Journal of Educational Psychology 77: 613–632. doi:10.1348/000709906X120132 CrossRef
- Augustine, N. R. (2005). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Retrieved from http://sciencedems.house.gov/Media/File/Reports/natacad_compete_exsum_6feb06.pdf.
- Baumeister R. F., Campbell J. D., Krueger J. L., Vohs K. D. (2003) Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness or healthier lifestyles?. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 4: 1–44. doi:10.1111/1529-1006.01431 CrossRef
- Blackwell L. S., Trzesniewski K., Dweck C. S. (2007) Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development 78: 246–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x CrossRef
- Burns K. C., Isbell L. M. (2007) Promoting malleability is not one size fits all: Priming implicit theories of intelligence as a function of self-theories. Self and Identity 6: 51–63. doi:10.1080/15298860600823864 CrossRef
- Ceci, S. J., Williams, W. M. (Eds.) (2007) Why aren’t there more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
- Chiu C., Dweck C. S., Tong J. Y., Fu J. H. (1997) Implicit theories and conceptions of morality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73: 923–940. doi:10.1037//0022-35126.96.36.1993 CrossRef
- Chiu C., Hong Y., Dweck C. S. (1997) Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73: 19–30. doi:10.1037//0022-35188.8.131.52 CrossRef
- Dutton K. A., Brown J. D. (1997) Global self-esteem and specific self-views as determinants of people’s reactions to success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73: 139–148. doi:10.1037//0022-35184.108.40.206 CrossRef
- Dweck C. S. (1999) Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press, Philadelphia, PA
- Dweck C. S. (2006) Is math a gift? Beliefs that put females at risk. In: Ceci S. J., Williams W. M. (Eds.) Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
- Dweck C. S., Hong Y., Chiu C. (1993) Implicit theories: Individual differences in the likelihood and meaning of dispositional inference. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 19: 644–656. doi:10.1177/0146167293195015 CrossRef
- Dweck C. S., Leggett E. L. (1988) A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review 95: 256–273. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.95.2.256 CrossRef
- Dweck C. S., & Molden D. C. (2005). Self-theories: Their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In: Elliot A., & Dweck C. S. Handbook of competence and motivation. (pp 122–140) New York: Guilford Press.
- Erdley C., Loomis C., Cain K., Dumas-Hines F., Dweck C. S. (1997) The relations among children’s social goals, implicit personality theories and response to social failure. Developmental Psychology 33: 263–272. doi:10.1037//0012-16220.127.116.113 CrossRef
- Grant H., Dweck C. S. (2003) Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85: 541–553. doi:10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1681 CrossRef
- Hill C., Corbett C., St. Rose A. (2010) Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. AAUW, Washington, DC
- Hong Y. Y., Chiu C., Dweck C. S. (1995) Implicit theories of intelligence: Reconsidering the role of confidence in achievement motivation. In: Kernis M. (Ed.) Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem. Plenum, New York, pp 197–216
- Hong Y., Chiu C., Dweck C. S., Lin D. M. S., Wan W. (1999) Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 77: 588–599. doi:10.1037//0022-3522.214.171.1248 CrossRef
- H. R. 2272–110th Congress: America COMPETES Act. (2007). In GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). Retrieved from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/110/hr2272.
- H. R. 5116–111th Congress: America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010. (2010). In GovTrack.us (database of federal legislation). Retrieved from http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/111/hr5116.
- Hyde J. S., Lindberg S. M., Linn M. C., Ellis A. B., Williams C. C. (2008) Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science 312: 494–495. doi:10.1126/science.1160364 CrossRef
- King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., & Watkins, D. A. (2012). How you think about your intelligence determines how you feel in school: The role of theories of intelligence on academic emotions. Learning and Individual Differences. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.005.
- Midgley C., Arunkumar R., Urdan T. C. (1996) “If I don’t do well tomorrow, there’s a reason:” Predictors of adolescents’ use of academic self-handicapping strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology 88: 423–434. doi:10.1037//0022-06126.96.36.1993 CrossRef
- Miller C. H., Burgoon J. K., Hall J. R. (2007) The effects of implicit theories of moral character on affective reactions to moral transgressions. Social Cognition 25: 819–832. doi:10.1521/soco.2007.25.6.819 CrossRef
- Plaks J. E., Dweck C. S., Grant H. (2005) Violations of implicit theories and the sense of prediction and control: Implications for motivated person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 88: 245–262. doi:10.1037/0022-35188.8.131.527 CrossRef
- Rattan, A., Savani, K., Naidu, N. V. R., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Can everyone become highly intelligent? Cultural differences in and societal consequences of beliefs about the universal potential for intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. doi:10.1037/a0029263.
- Renaud J., McConnell A. (2007) Wanting to be better but thinking you can’t: Implicit theories of personality moderate the impact of self-discrepancies on self-esteem. Self and Identity 6: 41–50. doi:10.1080/15298860600764597 CrossRef
- Rhodewalt F. (1994) Conceptions of ability, achievement goals, and individual differences in self-handicapping behavior: On the application of implicit theories. Journal of Personality 62: 67–85. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00795.x CrossRef
- Robins R. W., Pals J. L. (2002) Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity 1: 313–336. doi:10.1080/15298860290106805 CrossRef
- Seymour E., Hewitt N. M. (1997) Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Westview Press, Boulder, CO
- Shih S. (2011) Perfectionism, implicit theories of intelligence, and Taiwanese eight-grade students’ academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research 104: 131–142. doi:10.1080/00220670903570368 CrossRef
- Valian V. (2006) Women at the top in science-and elsewhere. In: Ceci S.J., Williams W. M. (Eds.) Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC
- Longitudinal changes in college math students’ implicit theories of intelligence
Social Psychology of Education
Volume 16, Issue 2 , pp 241-256
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Implicit theories of intelligence
- Math intelligence
- Math education