Cosmopolitanism and the De-colonial Option
- Walter Mignolo
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
What are the differences between cosmopolitanism and globalization? Are they “natural” historical processes or are they designed for specific purposes? Was Kant cosmopolitanism good for the entire population of the globe or did it respond to a particular Eurocentered view of what a cosmo-polis should be? The article argues that, while the term “globalization” in the most common usage refers and correspond to neo-liberal globalization projects and ambitions (roughly from 1980 to 2008), and the Kantian concept of “cosmopolitanism” responded to the second wave (XVIII and XIX of European global expansion), “de-colonial cosmopolitanism” refers to global processes and conceptualizations delinking from both neo-liberal globalization and liberal cosmopolitan ideals. But it delinks also from theological and Marxist visions of a homogenous world center around religious ideals or state socialist regulations. De-colonial cosmopolitanism is a cosmopolitanism of multiple trajectories aiming at a trans-modern world based on pluriversality rather than on a new and good universal for all.
- Anghie, A Francisco de Vitoria and the colonial origins of international law. In: Darian-Smith, E, Fitzpatrick, P eds. (1999) Laws of the postcolonial. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, pp. 89-108
- Appiah, KA (2006) Cosmopolitanism. Ethics in a world of strangers. W.W. Norton, New York
- Boroujerdi, M (1996) Iranian intellectuals and the West—The tormented triumph of nativism. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse
- Chatterjee, P (2004) The politics of the governed. Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. Columbia University Press, New York
- de Ayala, F. G. P. (1985). Nueva Corónica y Buen Gobierno (, 1985). In J. V. Murra & R. Adorno (Eds.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
- de Vitoria, F. (1532/1989). Relectio de Indis. Madrid: Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas.
- Fanon, F. (1963). The wretched of the earth (Constance Farrington, Trans.). New York: Grove Press.
- Grosfóguel, R. (2008). Transmodernity, border thinking, and global coloniality. Decolonizing political economy and postcolonial studies. In Eurozine; http://www.eurozine.com/articles/2008-07-04-grosfoguel-en.html.
- Kant, I. (1996). Anthropology from a pragmatic point of view (Victor Lyle Dowdell, Trans.). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
- Mignolo, WD (2000) The many faces of cosmo-polis: Border thinking and critical cosmopolitanism. Public Culture 12: pp. 721-748 CrossRef
- Ortelius, A. (1570). Typus Orbis Terrarum. http://nla.gov.au/nla.map-rm2044.
- Steger, M (2006) Globalism. Market ideology meets terrorism. Rowman and Littlefield, New York
- Toulmin, S (1990) Cosmopolis. The hidden agenda of modernity. Free Press, New York
- Weik, A (2007) “The uses, hazards of expatriation”: Richard Wright’s cosmopolitanism in process. African American Review 41: pp. 459-475
- Cosmopolitanism and the De-colonial Option
Studies in Philosophy and Education
Volume 29, Issue 2 , pp 111-127
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Modern/colonial world
- Our modernity and their modernity
- Modernity as an Eurocentered and imperial narrative
- Walter Mignolo (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Duke University, 101 Science Building, East Campus, Box 90670, Durham, NC, 27708-0670, USA