C. S. Peirce’s Dialogical Conception
of Sign Processes
Cite this article as: Bergman, M. Stud Philos Educ (2005) 24: 213. doi:10.1007/s11217-005-3845-0 Abstract
This article examines the contention that the central concepts of C. S. Peirce’s semeiotic are inherently communicational. It is argued that the Peircean approach avoids the pitfalls of objectivism and constructivism, rendering the sign-user neither a passive recipient nor an omnipotent creator of meaning. Consequently, semeiotic may serve as a useful general framework for studies of learning processes.
Keywords: communication dialogue learning Peirce semiosis sign References Bergman, M. 2000 Reflections on the role of the communicative sign in semeiotic Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society XXXVI 225 254 Google Scholar Brock, J. 1975 Peirce’s conception of semiotic Semiotica 14 124 141 Google Scholar Chisholm, R.M. 1952 Intentionality and the theory of signs Philosophical Studies 3 56 63 Google Scholar Colapietro, V.M. 1989Peirce’s approach to the self: A semiotic perspective on human subjectivity State University of New York Press Albany Google Scholar Cunningham, D.J. 1992 On the need for an educational semiotic Tarasti, E. eds. Center and periphery in representations and institutions The international semiotics institute Imatra 423 450 Google Scholar Fetzer, J.H. 2001Computers and cognition: Why minds are not machines Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht Google Scholar Fisch, M.H. 1986Peirce, semeiotic, and pragmatism Indiana University Press Bloomington Google Scholar Greenlee, D. 1973Peirce’s concept of sign Mouton & Co The Hague Google Scholar Houser, N. 1987 Toward a Peircean semiotic theory of learning The American Journal of Semiotics 5 251 274 Google Scholar Keeler, M.A. 1990 Investigating transparency in the conditions of mediation from a semeiotic view Semiotica 82 15 41 Google Scholar Morris, C.W. 1946Signs, language, and behavior Prentice-Hall New York Google Scholar Parmentier, R.J. 1985 Signs’ place in medias res: Peirce’s concept of semiotic mediation Mertz, E. Parmentier, R.J. eds. Semiotic mediation: Sociocultural and psychological perspectives Academic Press Orlando 23 48 Google Scholar
Peirce C.S. (1931-1958).
Collected papers of Charles S. Peirce (CP). 8 Vols., C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Vols. 1-6) (eds), & A. Burks (Vols. 7-8) (ed). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Peirce C.S. (1976).
The new elements of mathematics (NEM). 4 Vols. C. Eisele (ed). The Hague: Mouton Publishers
Peirce C.S. (1977).
Semiotic and significs: The correspondence between Charles S. Peirce and Victoria Lady Welby (SS). C.S. Hardwick (ed). Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Peirce C.S. (1982-).
Writings of Charles S. Peirce: A chronological edition (W). 6 Vols. to date. The Peirce Edition Project (ed). Bloomington: Indiana University Press
Peirce C.S. (1992-1998).
The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings (EP). 2 Vols. N. Houser & C. Kloesel (Vol. 1) (eds), & The Peirce Edition Project (Vol. 2) (ed). Bloomington: Indiana University Press Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W. 1949The mathematical theory of communication The University of Illinois Press Urbana Google Scholar Tiercelin, C. 1995 The relevance of Peirce’s semiotic for contemporary issues in cognitive science Haaparanta, L. Heinamaa, S. eds. Mind and cognition: Philosophical perspectives on cognitive science and artificial intelligence Acta Philosophica Fennica 58,Helsinki 37 74 Google Scholar Wells, R.S. 1977 Criteria for semiosis Sebeok, T.A. eds. A perfusion of signs Indiana University Press Bloomington 1 21 Google Scholar