Abstract
Recent years have seen an increased interest in the question of whether the gravitational action of planets could have an influence on the solar dynamo. Without discussing the observational validity of the claimed correlations, we examine which possible physical mechanism might link the weak planetary forces with solar dynamo action. We focus on the helicity oscillations that were recently found in simulations of the current-driven, kink-type Tayler instability, which is characterized by an \(m=1\) azimuthal dependence. We show how these helicity oscillations may be resonantly excited by some \(m=2\) perturbations that reflect a tidal oscillation. Specifically, we speculate that the tidal oscillation of 11.07 years induced by the Venus–Earth–Jupiter system may lead to a 1:1 resonant excitation of the oscillation of the \(\alpha\)-effect. Finally, we recover a 22.14-year cycle of the solar dynamo in the framework of a reduced zero-dimensional \(\alpha\)–\(\Omega\) dynamo model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abreu, J.A., Beer, J., Ferriz-Mas, A., McCracken, K.G., Steinhilber, F.: 2012, Is there a planetary influence on solar activity? Astron. Astrophys. 548, A88. DOI .
Babcock, H.W.: 1961, The topology of the suns magnetic field and the 22-year cycle. Astrophys. J. 133, 572. DOI .
Bollinger, C.J.: 1952, A 44.77 year Jupiter–Venus–Earth configuration Sun-tide period in solar-climatic cycles. Proc. Okla. Acad. Sci. 33, 307.
Bonanno, A., Brandenburg, A., Del Sordo, F., Mitra, D.: 2012, Breakdown of chiral symmetry during saturation of the Tayler instability. Phys. Rev. E 86, 016313. DOI .
Brandenburg, A.: 2005, The case for a distributed solar dynamo shaped by near-surface shear. Astrophys. J. 625, 625. DOI .
Brown, T.M., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Dziembowski, W.A., Goode, P., Gough, D.O., Morrow, C.: 1989, Inferring the Sun’s internal angular velocity from observed p-mode frequency splitting. Astrophys. J. 343, 526. DOI .
Callebaut, D.K., de Jager, C., Duhau, S.: 2012, The influence of planetary attractions on the solar tachocline. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 80, 73. DOI .
Cébron, D., Hollerbach, R.: 2014, Tidally driven dynamos in a rotating sphere. Astrophys. J. Lett. 789, L25. DOI .
Charbonneau, P.: 2010, Dynamo models of the solar cycle. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 7, 3. DOI .
Charbonneau, P., Dikpati, M.: 2000, Stochastic fluctuations in a Babcock-model of the solar cycle. Astrophys. J. 543, 1027. DOI .
Charvatova, I.: 1997, Solar-terrestrial and climatic phenomena in relation to solar inertial motion. Surv. Geophys. 18, 131. DOI .
Chatterjee, P., Mitra, D., Brandenburg, A., Rheinhardt, M.: 2011, Spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking by hydromagnetic buoyancy. Phys. Rev. E 84, 025403. DOI .
Chiba, M., Tosa, M.: 1990, Swing excitation of galactic magnetic-fields induced by spiral density waves. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 244, 714. DOI .
Choudhuri, A.R., Karak, B.B.: 2009, A possible explanation of the Maunder minimum from a flux transport dynamo model. Res. Astron. Astrophys. 9, 953.
Choudhuri, A.R., Schüssler, M., Dikpati, M.: 1995, The solar dynamo with meridional circulation. Astron. Astrophys. 303, L29.
Cole, T.W.: 1973, Periodicities in solar activities. Solar Phys. 30, 103. DOI .
Condon, J.J., Schmidt, R.R.: 1975, Planetary tides and the sunspot cycles. Solar Phys. 42, 529. DOI .
Courvoisier, A., Hughes, D.W., Tobias, S.M.: 2006, \(\alpha\) effect in a family of chaotic flows. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 034503. DOI .
Davidson, P.A.: 2001, An Introduction to Magnetohydrodynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
De Jager, C., Versteegh, G.: 2005, Do planetary motions drive solar variability? Solar Phys. 229, 175. DOI .
Dikpati, M., Gilman, P.: 2001, Flux-transport dynamos with alpha-effect from global instability of tachocline differential rotation: A solution for magnetic parity selection in the Sun. Astrophys. J. 559, 428. DOI .
D’Silva, S., Choudhuri, A.R.: 1993, A theoretical model for tilts of bipolar magnetic regions. Astron. Astrophys. 272, 621.
Fan, Y.: 2009, Magnetic fields in the solar convection zone. Living Rev. Solar Phys. 6, 4. DOI .
Ferriz Mas, A., Schmitt, D., Schüssler, M.: 1994, A dynamo effect due to instability of magnetic flux tubes. Astron. Astrophys. 289, 949.
Gellert, M., Rüdiger, G., Hollerbach, R.: 2011, Helicity and alpha-effect by current-driven instabilities of helical magnetic fields. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 414, 2696. DOI .
Giesecke, A., Stefani, F., Burguete, J.: 2012, Impact of time-dependent nonaxisymmetric velocity perturbations on dynamo action of von Kármán-like flows. Phys. Rev. E 86, 066303. DOI .
Gray, L.J., Beer, J., Geller, M., Haigh, J.D., Lockwood, M., Matthes, K., Cubasch, U., Fleitmann, D., Harrison, G., Hood, L., Luterbacher, J., Meehl, G.A., Shindell, D., van Geel, B., White, W.: 2010, Solar influences on climate. Rev. Geophys. 48, RG4001. DOI .
Herreman, W., Nore, C., Cappanera, L., Guermond, J.-L.: 2015, Tayler instability in liquid metal columns and liquid metal batteries. J. Fluid Mech. 771, 79. DOI .
Hoyng, P.: 1993, Helicity fluctuations in mean-field theory: An explanation for the variability of the solar cycle? Astron. Astrophys. 272, 321.
Hung, C.-C.: 2007, Apparent relations between solar activity and solar tides caused by the planets. NASA/TM-2007-214817, 1.
Jiang, J., Chatterjee, P., Choudhuri, A.R.: 2007, Solar activity forecast with a dynamo model. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 381, 1527. DOI .
Jose, P.D.: 1965, Suns motion and sunspots. Astron. J. 70, 193. DOI .
Krause, F., Rädler, K.-H.: 1980, Mean-Field Magnetohydrodynamics and Dynamo Theory, Akademie Verlag, Berlin.
Leighton, R.B.: 1964, Transport of magnetic field on the Sun. Astrophys. J. 140, 1547. DOI .
Meir, A.J., Schmidt, P.G., Bakhtiyarov, S.I., Overfelt, R.A.: 2004, Numerical simulation of steady liquid – Metal flow in the presence of a static magnetic field. J. Appl. Mech. 71, 786. DOI .
Okhlopkov, V.P.: 2014, The 11-year cycle of solar activity and configurations of the planets. Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. 69, 257. DOI .
Palus, M., Kurths, J., Schwarz, U., Novotna, D., Charvatova, I.: 2000, Is the solar activity cycle synchronized with the solar inertial motion? Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos Appl. Sci. Eng. 10, 2519. DOI .
Parker, E.N.: 1955, Hydromagnetic dynamo models. Astrophys. J. 122, 293. DOI .
Pikovsky, A., Rosenblum, M., Kurths, J.: 2001, Synchronizations: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Pitts, E., Tayler, R.J.: 1985, The adiabatic stability of stars containing magnetic-fields. 6. The influence of rotation. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 216, 139. DOI .
Proctor, M.: 2006, Dynamo Action and the Sun, EAS Pub. Ser. 21, 241. DOI .
Rädler, K., Stepanov, R.: 2006, Mean electromotive force due to turbulence of a conducting fluid in the presence of mean flow. Phys. Rev. E 73, 056311. DOI .
Rüdiger, G., Kitchatinov, L.L., Hollerbach, R.: 2013, Magnetic Processes in Astrophysics, Wiley-VCH, Berlin.
Rüdiger, G., Schultz, M., Gellert, M., Stefani, F.: 2015, Subcritical excitation of the current-driven Tayler instability by super-rotation. Phys. Fluids 28, 014105. DOI .
Scafetta, N.: 2010, Empirical evidence for a celestial origin of the climate oscillations and its implications. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 72, 951. DOI .
Scafetta, N.: 2014, The complex planetary synchronization structure of the solar system. Pattern Recogn. Phys. 2, 1. DOI .
Schmitt, D., Schüssler, M., Ferriz Mas, A.: 1996, Intermittent solar activity by an on-off dynamo. Astron. Astrophys. 311, L1.
Seilmayer, M., Stefani, F., Gundrum, T., Weier, T., Gerbeth, G., Gellert, M., Rüdiger, G.: 2012, Experimental evidence for Tayler instability in a liquid metal column. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 244501. DOI .
Spruit, H.: 2002, Dynamo action by differential rotation in a stably stratified stellar interior. Astron. Astrophys. 381, 923. DOI .
Steenbeck, M., Krause, F.: 1969, Zur Dynamotheorie stellarer und planetarer Magnetfelder. I. Berechnung sonnenähnlicher Wechselfeldgeneratoren. Astron. Nachr. 291, 49. DOI .
Steenbeck, M., Krause, F., Rädler, K.-H.: 1966, Berechnung der mittleren Lorentz-Feldstärke vxB für ein elektrisch leitendes Medium in turbulenter durch Coriolis-Kräfte beeinflusster Bewegung. Z. Naturforsch. A, J. Phys. Sci. 21(4), 369. DOI .
Stefani, F., Kirillov, O.N.: 2015, Destabilization of rotating flows with positive shear by azimuthal magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. E 92, 051001(R). DOI .
Stix, M.: 1972, Nonlinear dynamo waves. Astron. Astrophys. 20, 9.
Svensmark, H., Friis-Christensen, E.: 1997, Variation of cosmic ray flux and global cloud coverage – A missing link in solar-climate relationships. J. Atmos. Solar-Terr. Phys. 59, 1225. DOI .
Takahashi, K.: 1968, On the relation between the solar activity cycle and the solar tidal force induced by the planets. Solar Phys. 3, 598. DOI .
Tayler, R.J.: 1973, The adiabatic stability of stars containing magnetic fields-I: Toroidal fields. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 161, 365. DOI .
Vainshtein, S.I., Cattaneo, F.: 1992, Nonlinear restrictions on dynamo action. Astrophys. J. 393, 165. DOI .
Weber, M.A., Fan, Y., Miesch, M.S.: 2013, Comparing simulations of rising flux tubes through the solar convection zone with observations of solar active regions: Constraining the dynamo field strength. Solar Phys. 287, 239. DOI .
Weber, N., Galindo, V., Stefani, F., Weier, T., Wondrak, T.: 2013, Numerical simulation of the Tayler instability in liquid metals. New J. Phys. 15, 043034. DOI .
Weber, N., Galindo, V., Stefani, F., Weier, T.: 2015, The Tayler instability at low magnetic Prandtl numbers: between chiral symmetry breaking and helicity oscillations. New J. Phys. 17, 113013. DOI .
Weiss, N.O., Tobias, S.M.: 2016, Supermodulation of the Sun’s magnetic activity: The effect of symmetry changes. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 456, 2654. DOI .
Wilmot-Smith, A.L., Nandy, D., Hornig, G., Martens, P.C.H.: 2006, A time delay model for solar and stellar dynamos. Astrophys. J. 652, 696. DOI .
Wilson, I.R.G.: 2013, The Venus–Earth–Jupiter spin-orbit coupling model. Pattern Recogn. Phys. 1, 147. DOI .
Wood, K.: 1972, Sunspots and planets. Nature 240(5376), 91. DOI .
Yoshimura, H.: 1975, Solar-cycle dynamo wave propagation. Astrophys. J. 201, 740. DOI .
Zahn, J.-P., Brun, A.S., Mathis, S.: 2007, On magnetic instabilities and dynamo action in stellar radiation zones. Astron. Astrophys. 474, 145. DOI .
Zhang, K., Chan, K.H., Zou, J., Liao, X., Schubert, G.: 2003, A three-dimensional spherical nonlinear interface dynamo. Astrophys. J. 596, 663. DOI .
Zhang, H., Moss, D., Kleeorin, N., Kuzanyan, K., Rogachevskii, I., Sokoloff, D., Gao, Y., Xu, H.: 2012, Current helicity of active regions as a tracer of large-scale solar magnetic helicity. Astrophys. J. 751. DOI .
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft in the frame of the SPP 1488 (PlanetMag), as well as by the Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Deutscher Forschungszentren (HGF) in the frame of the Helmholtz alliance LIMTECH. Wilcox Solar Observatory data used in this study were obtained via the web site wso.stanford.edu (courtesy of J.T. Hoeksema). The sunspot data are SILSO data from the Royal Observatory of Belgium, Brussels, obtained via www.sidc.be/silso/infosnytot . F. Stefani thanks R. Arlt, A. Bonnano, A. Brandenburg, A. Choudhuri, D. Hughes, M. Gellert, G. Rüdiger, and D. Sokoloff for fruitful discussion on the solar-dynamo mechanism.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Appendix: The Numerical Model
Appendix: The Numerical Model
In this appendix we sketch the integro-differential equation scheme that was used in Section 2 to calculate the oscillations of the helicity and \(\alpha\). More details can be found in Weber et al. (2013, 2015). For an alternative numerical method to treat the TI, see Herreman et al. (2015).
In our code we circumvent the usual \(\mathit{Pm}\) limitations of pure differential-equation codes by replacing the solution of the induction equation for the magnetic field by invoking the so-called quasi-static approximation (Davidson, 2001). We replace the explicit time stepping of the magnetic field by computing the electrostatic potential by a Poisson solver and by deriving the electric-current density. In contrast to many other inductionless approximations in which this procedure is sufficient, in our case we cannot avoid computing the induced magnetic field as well. The reason for this is the presence of an externally applied electrical current in the fluid. Computing the Lorentz-force term it turns out that the product of the applied current with the induced field is on the same order as the product of the magnetic field (due to the applied current) with the induced current. The induced magnetic field is computed as follows: in the interior of the domain, we apply the quasi-stationary approximation and solve the vectorial Poisson equation for the magnetic field that results when the temporal derivative in the induction equation is set to zero. At the boundary of the domain, however, the induced magnetic field is computed from the induced current density by means of Biot–Savart’s law. In this way, we arrive at an integro-differential equation approach, similar to the method used by Meir et al. (2004).
In detail, the numerical model as developed by Weber et al. (2013) works as follows: it uses the OpenFOAM library to solve the Navier–Stokes equations (NSE) for incompressible fluids
with \(\boldsymbol {u}\) denoting the velocity, \(p\) the (modified) pressure, \(\boldsymbol {f}_{\mathrm {L}} = \boldsymbol {J} \times\boldsymbol {B} \) the electromagnetic Lorentz force density, \(\boldsymbol {J}\) the total current density, and \(\boldsymbol {B}\) the total magnetic field. The NSE is solved using the PISO algorithm and applying no-slip boundary conditions at the walls.
Ohm’s law in moving conductors
allows us to compute the induced current [\(\boldsymbol {j}\)] by previously solving a Poisson equation for the perturbed electric potential [\(\varphi= \phi-J_{0}z/\sigma\)]:
We concentrate now on cylindrical geometries with an axially applied current. After subtracting the (constant) potential part [\(J_{0}z/\sigma\)], with \(z\) as the coordinate along the cylinder axis, we use the simple boundary condition \(\varphi= 0\) at the top and bottom and \(\boldsymbol {n}\cdot\nabla \varphi=0\) at the mantle of the cylinder, with \(\boldsymbol{n}\) as the surface normal vector.
The induced magnetic field at the boundary of the domain can then be calculated by Biot–Savart’s law
In the bulk of the domain, the magnetic field is computed by solving the vectorial Poisson equation
which results from the full time-dependent induction equation in the quasi-stationary approximation.
Knowing \(\boldsymbol {b}\) and \(\boldsymbol {j}\), we compute the Lorentz force \({\boldsymbol {f}}_{\mathrm {L}}\) for the next iteration. For more details about the numerical scheme, see Sections 2 and 3 of Weber et al. (2013).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stefani, F., Giesecke, A., Weber, N. et al. Synchronized Helicity Oscillations: A Link Between Planetary Tides and the Solar Cycle?. Sol Phys 291, 2197–2212 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0968-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11207-016-0968-0