Sociological Forum

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 209–244

Kuznets’s Inverted U-Curve Hypothesis: The Rise, Demise, and Continued Relevance of a Socioeconomic Law

Authors

    • Department of SociologyState University of New York – Stony Brook
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11206-005-4098-y

Cite this article as:
Moran, T.P. Sociol Forum (2005) 20: 209. doi:10.1007/s11206-005-4098-y

Abstract

This paper provides a historical analysis of the changing significance of the most influential statement ever made on inequality and development—Simon Kuznets’s “inverted U-curve hypothesis.” The shifting interpretations and appropriations of the hypothesis over time—from its status as a speculative supposition in 1955, to its rise and fall as a reified socioeconomic law, to its contested standing in the social sciences today—demonstrate how Kuznets’s arguments, originally advanced under more limited conditions, became transformed into overarching theoretical, empirical, and political constructions. This history suggests that even empirically grounded and testable social science models are contingent on the broader social and political contexts in which they are produced and negotiated.

Key Words

Kuznets’s U-curve income inequality development comparative theory social scientific knowledge

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005