Skip to main content
Log in

The Problems of Assessing Transnational Mobility: Identifying Latent Groups of Immigrants in Germany Using Factor Mixture Analysis

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores immigrants’ transnational mobility in Germany. It uses data of the Socio-Economic Panel Study and four indicators regarding frequency, length, and total duration of visits to the country of origin. The study applies factor mixture analyses in order to investigate whether (a) the observed indicators refer to a uniform underlying construct of transnational mobility and (b) the relationship between the latent construct and the observed indicators establishes in a uniform manner for all respondents. The most reliable model distinguishes three latent classes of immigrants, thus indicating no uniform underlying construct of transnational mobility. Theoretically consistent findings could be derived for about 58 % of the 4019 respondents. However, the relation between the observed indicators and the latent variable diverges substantially for the remaining 42 %. Thus, the findings indicate that the commonly applied indicator of return visits largely fails to assess transnational mobility. Rather, different groups of immigrants engage very diversely in visits to the country of origin. The findings stimulate a variety of conceptual problems future theoretical and empirical research needs to tackle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. As has been shown so far, transnationalism covers a wide range of phenomena, e.g. social ties, mobility or identities. However, whenever the notations of transmigrants, transnational immigrants, and transnationals are used in the subsequent sections of this study, they solely refer to the restricted topic of transnational mobility.

  2. The countries of origin are: Greece, Italy, Spain, Turkey and former Yugoslavia.

  3. Usually the expected maximization (EM) algorithm for incomplete data is used (Dempster et al. 1977). Due to space limitations the underlying computation of the maximum-likelihood estimates cannot be discussed in detail.

  4. The term of item response theory usually applies to a case where the latent variable is continuous and the indicators are categorical (Collins and Lanza 2010: 6; Muthén and Asparouhov 2006: 1053).

  5. The corresponding values as well as each class’ mean remittances and age are shown in Table 4. As no imputations were performed, the diverging numbers of respondents are due to missing values.

  6. The values equal: 0 “not at all”, 1 “<3 weeks”, 2 “1–3 months”, 3 “4–6 months”, 4 “more than 6 months”.

  7. Transmigrants might as well move between more than two countries or between countries other than their country of origin. For the sake of clarity, the arguably most common case was regarded in this paper.

References

  • Bagwell, S. (2015). Transnational Entrepreneurship amongst Vietnamese Businesses in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(2), 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, J. W. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 615–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, S. L., Muthén, B., Kaprio, J., D’Onofrio, B. M., Viken, R. & Rose, R. J. (2013). Models and strategies for factor mixture analysis: An example concerning the structure underlying psychological disorders. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(4), 681–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. M. & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. (Wiley series in probability and statistics).

  • Constant, A., & Massey, D. S. (2003). Self-selection, earnings, and out-migration: A longitudinal study of immigrants to Germany. Journal of Population Economics, 16(4), 631–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constant, A., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2012). The dynamics of repeat migration: A Markov chain analysis. International Migration Review, 46(2), 362–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 39(1), 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrkamp, P. (2005). Placing identities: Transnational practices and local attachments of Turkish immigrants in Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(2), 345–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser, H. (2009). Pluralisierung oder Assimilation? Effekte der multiplen Inklusion auf die Integration von Migranten. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 38(5), 358–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faist, T. (2000). The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational social spaces. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.

  • Garip, F. (2012). Discovering diverse mechanisms of migration: The Mexico–US Stream 1970–2000. Population and Development Review, 38(3), 393–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruner-Domic, S. (2011). Transnational lifestyles as a new form of cosmopolitan social identification? Latin American women in German urban spaces. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(3), 471–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarnizo, L. E., Portes, A., & Haller, W. (2003). Assimilation and transnationalism: Determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants. American Journal of Sociology, 108(6), 1211–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itzigsohn, J., & Saucedo, S. G. (2002). Immigrant incorporation and sociocultural transnationalism. International Migration Review, 36(3), 766–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itzigsohn, J., & Saucedo, S. G. (2005). Incorporation, transnationalism, and gender: Immigrant incorporation and transnational participation as gendered processes. International Migration Review, 39(4), 895–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalter, F. (2011). Social capital and the dynamics of temporary labour migration from Poland to Germany. European Sociological Review, 27(5), 555–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press. (Methodology in the social sciences).

  • Kraemer, J. (2014). Friend or freund: Social media and transnational connections in Berlin. Human–Computer Interaction, 29(1), 53–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krumme, H. (2004). Fortwährende Remigration: Das transnationale Pendeln türkischer Arbeitsmigrantinnen und Arbeitsmigranten im Ruhestand. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 33(2), 138–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuuire, V. Z., Arku, G., Luginaah, I., Abada, T. & Buzzelli, M. (2015). Impact of Remittance behaviour on immigrant homeownership trajectories: An analysis of the longitudinal survey of immigrants in Canada from 2001 to 2005. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-1011-9.

  • Ley, D. (2013). Does transnationalism trump immigrant integration? Evidence from Canada’s Links with East Asia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(6), 921–938.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcelli, E. A., & Lowell, B. L. (2005). Transnational twist: Pecuniary remittances and the socioeconomic integration of authorized and unauthorized Mexican immigrants in Los Angeles county1. International Migration Review, 39(1), 69–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mau, S., Mewes, J., & Zimmermann, A. (2008). Cosmopolitan attitudes through transnational social practices? Global Networks, 8(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B. (2006). Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional? Addiction, 101(Suppl. 1), 6–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2006). Item response mixture modeling: Application to tobacco dependence criteria. Addictive Behaviors, 31(6), 1050–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niederhafner, S. (2013). Comparing functions of transnational city networks in Europe and Asia. Asia Europe Journal, 11(4), 377–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowicka, M. (2013). Positioning strategies of Polish entrepreneurs in Germany: Transnationalizing Bourdieu’s notion of capital. International Sociology, 28(1), 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A monte carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty, M., Skrbis, Z., & Tranter, B. (2007). Home visits: Transnationalism among Australian migrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(5), 817–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2014). Is migration really increasing? (Migration Policy Debates).

  • Portes, A. (2003). Conclusion: Theoretical convergencies and empirical evidence in the study of immigrant transnationalism. International Migration Review, 37(3), 874–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., Guarnizo, L. E., & Landolt, P. (1999). The study of transnationalism: Pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 217–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., Haller, W., & Guarnizo, L. E. (2002). Transnational entrepreneurs: An alternative form of immigrant economic adaption. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 278–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pries, L. (2004). Determining the causes and durability of transnational labour migration between Mexico and the United States: Some empirical findings. International Migration, 42(2), 3–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saarela, J., & Finnäs, F. (2007). Adjustment failures in an immigrant population: Finns in Sweden. Social Indicators Research, 82(3), 545–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schans, D. (2009). Transnational family ties of immigrants in the Netherlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(7), 1164–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, N. G., Basch, L., & Blanc, C. S. (1995). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 68(1), 48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmer, P., & van Tubergen, F. (2014). Transnationalism and ethnic identification among adolescent children of immigrants in the Netherlands, Germany, England, and Sweden. International Migration Review, 48(3), 680–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schunck, R. (2011). Immigrant integration, transnational activities and the life course. In Wingens, M., Windzio, M., de Valk, H., & Aybek, C. (Eds.) A life-course perspective on migration and integration, (pp. 259–282). Springer Netherlands.

  • Siegel, M., & Lücke, M. (2013). Migrant transnationalism and the choice of transfer channels for remittances: The case of Moldova. Global Networks, 13(1), 120–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snel, E., Engbersen, G., & Leerkes, A. (2006). Transnational involvement and social integration. Global Networks, 6(3), 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsuda, Takeyuki. (2012). Whatever happened to simultaneity? Transnational migration theory and dual engagement in sending and receiving countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(4), 631–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Meeteren, Masja. (2012). Transnational activities and aspirations of irregular migrants in Belgium and the Netherlands. Global Networks, 12(3), 314–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89–106). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vertovec, S. (2001). Transnationalism and identity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(4), 573–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldinger, R. (2008). Between “here” and “there”: Immigrant cross-border activities and loyalties. International Migration Review, 42(1), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldinger, R. (2013). Immigrant transnationalism. Current Sociology, 61(5–6), 756–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waldinger, R., & Fitzgerald, D. (2004). Transnationalism in question. American Journal of Sociology, 109(5), 1177–1195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., & Liu, C. Y. (2015). Transnational activities of immigrant-owned firms and their performances in the USA. Small Business Economics, 44(2), 345–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sascha Riedel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Riedel, S. The Problems of Assessing Transnational Mobility: Identifying Latent Groups of Immigrants in Germany Using Factor Mixture Analysis. Soc Indic Res 131, 271–290 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1246-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1246-0

Keywords

Navigation