Abstract
This paper explores immigrants’ transnational mobility in Germany. It uses data of the Socio-Economic Panel Study and four indicators regarding frequency, length, and total duration of visits to the country of origin. The study applies factor mixture analyses in order to investigate whether (a) the observed indicators refer to a uniform underlying construct of transnational mobility and (b) the relationship between the latent construct and the observed indicators establishes in a uniform manner for all respondents. The most reliable model distinguishes three latent classes of immigrants, thus indicating no uniform underlying construct of transnational mobility. Theoretically consistent findings could be derived for about 58 % of the 4019 respondents. However, the relation between the observed indicators and the latent variable diverges substantially for the remaining 42 %. Thus, the findings indicate that the commonly applied indicator of return visits largely fails to assess transnational mobility. Rather, different groups of immigrants engage very diversely in visits to the country of origin. The findings stimulate a variety of conceptual problems future theoretical and empirical research needs to tackle.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
As has been shown so far, transnationalism covers a wide range of phenomena, e.g. social ties, mobility or identities. However, whenever the notations of transmigrants, transnational immigrants, and transnationals are used in the subsequent sections of this study, they solely refer to the restricted topic of transnational mobility.
The countries of origin are: Greece, Italy, Spain, Turkey and former Yugoslavia.
Usually the expected maximization (EM) algorithm for incomplete data is used (Dempster et al. 1977). Due to space limitations the underlying computation of the maximum-likelihood estimates cannot be discussed in detail.
The corresponding values as well as each class’ mean remittances and age are shown in Table 4. As no imputations were performed, the diverging numbers of respondents are due to missing values.
The values equal: 0 “not at all”, 1 “<3 weeks”, 2 “1–3 months”, 3 “4–6 months”, 4 “more than 6 months”.
Transmigrants might as well move between more than two countries or between countries other than their country of origin. For the sake of clarity, the arguably most common case was regarded in this paper.
References
Bagwell, S. (2015). Transnational Entrepreneurship amongst Vietnamese Businesses in London. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(2), 329–349.
Berry, J. W. (2001). A psychology of immigration. Journal of Social Issues, 57(3), 615–631.
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
Clark, S. L., Muthén, B., Kaprio, J., D’Onofrio, B. M., Viken, R. & Rose, R. J. (2013). Models and strategies for factor mixture analysis: An example concerning the structure underlying psychological disorders. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(4), 681–703.
Collins, L. M. & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: With applications in the social behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. (Wiley series in probability and statistics).
Constant, A., & Massey, D. S. (2003). Self-selection, earnings, and out-migration: A longitudinal study of immigrants to Germany. Journal of Population Economics, 16(4), 631–653.
Constant, A., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2012). The dynamics of repeat migration: A Markov chain analysis. International Migration Review, 46(2), 362–388.
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 39(1), 1–38.
Ehrkamp, P. (2005). Placing identities: Transnational practices and local attachments of Turkish immigrants in Germany. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(2), 345–364.
Esser, H. (2009). Pluralisierung oder Assimilation? Effekte der multiplen Inklusion auf die Integration von Migranten. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 38(5), 358–378.
Faist, T. (2000). The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational social spaces. Oxford, New York: Clarendon Press; Oxford University Press.
Garip, F. (2012). Discovering diverse mechanisms of migration: The Mexico–US Stream 1970–2000. Population and Development Review, 38(3), 393–433.
Gruner-Domic, S. (2011). Transnational lifestyles as a new form of cosmopolitan social identification? Latin American women in German urban spaces. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(3), 471–489.
Guarnizo, L. E., Portes, A., & Haller, W. (2003). Assimilation and transnationalism: Determinants of transnational political action among contemporary migrants. American Journal of Sociology, 108(6), 1211–1248.
Itzigsohn, J., & Saucedo, S. G. (2002). Immigrant incorporation and sociocultural transnationalism. International Migration Review, 36(3), 766–798.
Itzigsohn, J., & Saucedo, S. G. (2005). Incorporation, transnationalism, and gender: Immigrant incorporation and transnational participation as gendered processes. International Migration Review, 39(4), 895–920.
Kalter, F. (2011). Social capital and the dynamics of temporary labour migration from Poland to Germany. European Sociological Review, 27(5), 555–569.
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press. (Methodology in the social sciences).
Kraemer, J. (2014). Friend or freund: Social media and transnational connections in Berlin. Human–Computer Interaction, 29(1), 53–77.
Krumme, H. (2004). Fortwährende Remigration: Das transnationale Pendeln türkischer Arbeitsmigrantinnen und Arbeitsmigranten im Ruhestand. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 33(2), 138–153.
Kuuire, V. Z., Arku, G., Luginaah, I., Abada, T. & Buzzelli, M. (2015). Impact of Remittance behaviour on immigrant homeownership trajectories: An analysis of the longitudinal survey of immigrants in Canada from 2001 to 2005. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-015-1011-9.
Ley, D. (2013). Does transnationalism trump immigrant integration? Evidence from Canada’s Links with East Asia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39(6), 921–938.
Lo, Y., Mendell, N. R., & Rubin, D. B. (2001). Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika, 88(3), 767–778.
Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. (2005). Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychological Methods, 10(1), 21–39.
Marcelli, E. A., & Lowell, B. L. (2005). Transnational twist: Pecuniary remittances and the socioeconomic integration of authorized and unauthorized Mexican immigrants in Los Angeles county1. International Migration Review, 39(1), 69–102.
Mau, S., Mewes, J., & Zimmermann, A. (2008). Cosmopolitan attitudes through transnational social practices? Global Networks, 8(1), 1–24.
McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M.-H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 64–82.
Muthén, B. (2006). Should substance use disorders be considered as categorical or dimensional? Addiction, 101(Suppl. 1), 6–16.
Muthén, B., & Asparouhov, T. (2006). Item response mixture modeling: Application to tobacco dependence criteria. Addictive Behaviors, 31(6), 1050–1066.
Niederhafner, S. (2013). Comparing functions of transnational city networks in Europe and Asia. Asia Europe Journal, 11(4), 377–396.
Nowicka, M. (2013). Positioning strategies of Polish entrepreneurs in Germany: Transnationalizing Bourdieu’s notion of capital. International Sociology, 28(1), 29–47.
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A monte carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569.
O’Flaherty, M., Skrbis, Z., & Tranter, B. (2007). Home visits: Transnationalism among Australian migrants. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 30(5), 817–844.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2014). Is migration really increasing? (Migration Policy Debates).
Portes, A. (2003). Conclusion: Theoretical convergencies and empirical evidence in the study of immigrant transnationalism. International Migration Review, 37(3), 874–892.
Portes, A., Guarnizo, L. E., & Landolt, P. (1999). The study of transnationalism: Pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 22(2), 217–237.
Portes, A., Haller, W., & Guarnizo, L. E. (2002). Transnational entrepreneurs: An alternative form of immigrant economic adaption. American Sociological Review, 67(2), 278–298.
Pries, L. (2004). Determining the causes and durability of transnational labour migration between Mexico and the United States: Some empirical findings. International Migration, 42(2), 3–39.
Saarela, J., & Finnäs, F. (2007). Adjustment failures in an immigrant population: Finns in Sweden. Social Indicators Research, 82(3), 545–563.
Schans, D. (2009). Transnational family ties of immigrants in the Netherlands. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(7), 1164–1182.
Schiller, N. G., Basch, L., & Blanc, C. S. (1995). From immigrant to transmigrant: Theorizing transnational migration. Anthropological Quarterly, 68(1), 48–63.
Schimmer, P., & van Tubergen, F. (2014). Transnationalism and ethnic identification among adolescent children of immigrants in the Netherlands, Germany, England, and Sweden. International Migration Review, 48(3), 680–709.
Schunck, R. (2011). Immigrant integration, transnational activities and the life course. In Wingens, M., Windzio, M., de Valk, H., & Aybek, C. (Eds.) A life-course perspective on migration and integration, (pp. 259–282). Springer Netherlands.
Siegel, M., & Lücke, M. (2013). Migrant transnationalism and the choice of transfer channels for remittances: The case of Moldova. Global Networks, 13(1), 120–141.
Snel, E., Engbersen, G., & Leerkes, A. (2006). Transnational involvement and social integration. Global Networks, 6(3), 285–308.
Tsuda, Takeyuki. (2012). Whatever happened to simultaneity? Transnational migration theory and dual engagement in sending and receiving countries. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(4), 631–649.
van Meeteren, Masja. (2012). Transnational activities and aspirations of irregular migrants in Belgium and the Netherlands. Global Networks, 12(3), 314–332.
Vermunt, J. K., & Magidson, J. (2002). Latent class cluster analysis. In J. A. Hagenaars & A. L. McCutcheon (Eds.), Applied latent class analysis (pp. 89–106). Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Vertovec, S. (2001). Transnationalism and identity. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 27(4), 573–582.
Waldinger, R. (2008). Between “here” and “there”: Immigrant cross-border activities and loyalties. International Migration Review, 42(1), 3–29.
Waldinger, R. (2013). Immigrant transnationalism. Current Sociology, 61(5–6), 756–777.
Waldinger, R., & Fitzgerald, D. (2004). Transnationalism in question. American Journal of Sociology, 109(5), 1177–1195.
Wang, Q., & Liu, C. Y. (2015). Transnational activities of immigrant-owned firms and their performances in the USA. Small Business Economics, 44(2), 345–359.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Riedel, S. The Problems of Assessing Transnational Mobility: Identifying Latent Groups of Immigrants in Germany Using Factor Mixture Analysis. Soc Indic Res 131, 271–290 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1246-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-016-1246-0