Abstract
The present article aims to provide evidence to advance in the comprehension of the multiple relationships between temporality and wellbeing by exploring the relationship between time perspectives and subjective wellbeing in Chile. In so doing, it presents a critical stand of the current operationalisations of the ‘balanced time perspective’ (BTP). This article supports the theoretical premise that individuals’ time perspectives possess a contextual nature and that the BTP is socially relative. As a result, the article proposes a novel method to define and operationalise BTP. Using data from the United Nations Development Programme’s 2011 Human Development Survey for Chile (N = 2,535), an empirical analysis is carried out on the relationship between time perspectives and vital satisfaction, positive affects, negative affects and depressive symptomatology scales. The results show that in Chile a negative orientation towards the past exerts the most significant effect on subjective wellbeing and malaise, and the time perspective which most favours subjective wellbeing in Chilean society is that in which there is a low orientation towards Present and Past-Negative, a high orientation towards Past-Positive, and a medium orientation towards Future. This relationship between time perspectives and subjective wellbeing constitutes an advance in the study of the subjective dimension of temporality in Chile, and contributes to the theoretical and methodological discussions on time perspectives on an international level.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This study is part of a 3-year research (2011–2013) supported by The National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development in Chile. The main aim of this research was to analyze the temporal structures of the biographies and everyday lives on individuals in Chile. This research carried out an initial exploratory study of the time perspectives of individuals in Chile using a summarized version of the original ZTPI. The results show that model of time perspective for Chilean society is based on four components: Present, Past-Negative, Future and Past-Positive that are associated with socio-demographic and cultural variables.
The database is public and is available at: http://www.desarrollohumano.cl/base-datos/base-datos.htm.
These letters represent the different status levels of the socioeconomic classification system used in Chile. The system is based on two criteria: educational level and type of occupation of the head of household. When any of that information is missing, the classification is based on the possession of some relevant goods. It should be interpreted as follows: ABC1 = upper class; C2 = upper-middle class; C3 = middle class; D = lower-middle class; E = lower class.
References
Allemand, M., Hill, P., Ghaemmaghami, P., & Martin, M. (2012). Forgivingness and subjective well-being in adulthood. The moderating role of future time perspective. Journal of Research in Personality, 46, 32–39.
Anagnostopoulos, F., & Griva, F. (2012). Exploring time perspective in Greek young adults: Validation of the Zimbardo time Perspective Inventory and relationship with mental health indicators. Social Indicators Research, 106, 41–59.
Andrews, M. (2007). Shaping history. Narratives of political change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. (2003). Structure, agency and the internal conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bitsko, M., Stern, M., Dillon, R., Russell, E., & Laver, J. (2008). Happiness and time perspective as potential mediators of quality of life and depression in adolescent cancer. Pediatric Blood & Cancer, 50, 613–619.
Boniwell, I. (2005). Beyond time management: how the latest research on time perspective and perceived time use can assist clients with time-related concerns. International Journal of Evidence Based Coaching and Mentoring, 3(2), 61–74.
Boniwell, I., Osin, E., Linley, P. A., & Ivanchenko, G. V. (2010). A question of balance: Time perspective and well-being in British and Russian samples. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5, 24–40.
Boniwell, I., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). Balancing time perspective in pursuit of optimal functioning. In P. A. Linley & S. Joseph (Eds.), Positive psychology in practice (pp. 165–178). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Bourdieu, P. (1986). L’illusion biographique. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 62, 69–72.
Brockmeier, J. (2000). Autobiographical time. Narrative Inquiry, 10(1), 51–73.
Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54(1), 12–32.
Corral, V., Fraijo, B., & Pinheiro, J. (2006). Sustainable behavior and time perspective: Present, past and future orientations and their relationship with water conservation behavior. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 40(2), 139–147.
Corti, A. (2007). Heidegger; intérprete de San Agustín: El tiempo. Nuevas fuentes para la recepción heideggeriana de las Confesiones de San Agustín. Revista de Filosofía, 32(1), 143–163.
Coudin, G., & Lima, M. (2011). Being well as Time goes by: Future time perspective and well-being. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 11(2), 219–232.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2008). Fluir (flow): una psicología de la felicidad. Buenos Aires: Kairós.
D’Alessio, M., Guarino, A., De Pascalis, V., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Testing Zimbardo’ s Stanford Time Perspective Inventory (STPI)—short form an Italian study. Time & Society, 12(2/3), 333–347.
Díaz Morales, J. (2006). Estructura factorial y fiabilidad del Inventario de Perspectiva Temporal de Zimbardo. Psicothema, 18(3), 565–571.
Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2008). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39, 391–406.
Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C., & Henry, C. (2008). Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time & Society, 17(1), 47–61.
Durkheim, E. (1982). Las formas elementales de la vida religiosa. Madrid: Akal/Universitaria.
Eichhorn, J. (2012). Context matters: The effect of national-level factors on the relationship between socio-demographic characteristics of individuals on their life-satisfaction. World Values Research, 5(2), 26–45.
Elias, N. (1989). Über die Zeit. Frankfurt a M: Suhrkamp.
Evans, V. (2004). The structure of time: language, meaning and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamin.
Evans, V. (2007). How we conceptualize time: Language, meaning and temporal cognition. In V. Evans, B. K. Berger, & J. Zinken (Eds.), The Cognitive Linguistic Reader (pp. 733–765). London: Equinox.
Fieulaine, N., Apostolidis, Th, & Olivietto, F. (2006). Précarieté et troubles psychologiques: l’effet médiateur de la perspective temporelle. Les Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, 72, 3–16.
Flaherty, M. (1999). A Watched Pot. How we experience time. New York: New York University Press.
Frey, B., & Stutzer, A. (2005). Happiness research: State and prospects. Review of Social Economy, LXII(2), 207–228.
Gao, Y. (2011). Time perspective and life satisfaction among young adults in Taiwan. Social behavior and personality, 39(6), 729–736.
Güell, P., & Yopo, M. (2013). Perspectivas temporales en Chile. Proyecto Fondecyt N°1110402.
Laghi, F., Baiocco, R., D’Alessio, M., & Gurrieri, G. (2009). Suicidal ideation and time perspective in high school students. European Psychiatry, 24, 41–46.
Leccardi, C. (2002). Tiempo y construcción biográfica en la “sociedad de la incertidumbre”: reflexiones sobre las mujeres jóvenes. Nómadas, 16, 42–50.
Leccardi, C. (2005). Facing uncertainty. Temporality and biographies in the new century. Young. Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 13(2), 123–146.
McMahon, D. (2006). Una historia de la felicidad. Madrid: Taurus.
Milfont, T., Andrade, P., Belo, R., & Pessoa, V. (2008). Testing Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory in a Brazilian sample. Revista Interamericana de Psicología, 42(1), 49–58.
Moore, M., Höfer, S., McGee, H., & Ring, L. (2005). Can the concepts of depression and quality of life be integrated using a time perspective? Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 3(1), 1–10.
Muzzetto, L. (2006). Time and Meaning in Alfred Schütz. Time & Society, 15(1), 5–31.
Nassehi, A. (2008). Die Zeit der Geselleschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Nowotny, H. (2005). Time, modern and postmodern experience. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Palgi, Y., & Shmotkin, D. (2010). The predicament of time near the end of life: Time perspective trajectories of life satisfaction among the old-old. Aging & Mental Health, 14(5), 577–586.
Pavot, W., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1998). The Temporal Satisfaction With Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70(2), 340–354.
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo. (2012). Bienestar subjetivo: el desafío de repensar el desarrollo. Santiago: PNUD.
Ricoeur, P. (1988). Time and narrative III. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1992). Oneself as another. Chicago & London: The University of Chicago Press.
Roberts, B. (2002). Biographical research. Buckingham & Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Sobol-Kwapinska, M. (2009). Forms of present time orientation and satisfaction with life in the context of attitudes towards past and future. Social Behavior and Personality, 37(4), 433–440.
Stolarski, M., Bitner, J., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2011). Time perspective, emotional intelligence and discounting of delayed awards. Time & Society, 20(3), 346–363.
Taylor, C. (1989). The sources of the self. The making of the modern self. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Thompson, E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (Panas). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(3), 227–242.
Veenhoven, R. (2004). Subjective measures of well-being. Discussion Paper No. 2004/07. World Institute for Development Economics (UNU-WIDER). http://hdl.handle.net/10419/52848.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.
Wenze, W., Gunthert, K., & German, R. (2012). Biases in affective forecasting and recall in individuals with depression and anxiety symptoms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 895–906.
World Values Survey Wave 6 2010-2014 OFFICIAL AGGREGATE v.20140429. World Values Survey Association (www.worldvaluessurvey.org). Aggregate File Producer: Asep/JDS, Madrid SPAIN.
Zahavi, D. (2005). Subjectivity and selfhood. Investigating the First-Person Perspective. Cambridge & London: The MIT Press.
Zhang, J. H., Howell, R. T., & Bowerman, T. (2013a). Validating a brief measure of the Zimbardo Time Perspective Inventory. Time & Society, 22(3), 391–409.
Zhang, J. H., Howell, R. T., & Stolarski, M. (2013b). Comparing three methods to measure a balanced time perspective: The relationship between a balanced time perspective and subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14, 169–184.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-difference metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Fondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y Tecnológico (Fondecyt) Chile grant No. 1110402.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Güell, P., Orchard, M., Yopo, M. et al. Time Perspectives and Subjective Wellbeing in Chile. Soc Indic Res 123, 127–141 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0727-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0727-2