Estimating the Reliability of Single-Item Life Satisfaction Measures: Results from Four National Panel Studies
Life satisfaction is often assessed using single-item measures. However, estimating the reliability of these measures can be difficult because internal consistency coefficients cannot be calculated. Existing approaches use longitudinal data to isolate occasion-specific variance from variance that is either completely stable or variance that changes systematically over time. In these approaches, reliable occasion-specific variance is typically treated as measurement error, which would negatively bias reliability estimates. In the current studies, panel data and multivariate latent state-trait models are used to isolate reliable occasion-specific variance from random error and to estimate reliability for scores from single-item life satisfaction measures. Across four nationally representative panel studies with a combined sample size of over 68,000, reliability estimates increased by an average of 16% when the multivariate model was used instead of the more standard univariate longitudinal model.
- Alwin, D. F. (2007). Margins of error: A study of reliability in survey measurement. New York: Wiley.
- Biemer, P. P., Christ, S. L., & Wiesen, C. A. (2009). A general approach for estimating scale score reliability from panel survey data. Psychological Methods, 14, 400–412. doi:10.1037/a0016618. CrossRef
- Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
- Ehrhardt, J. J., Saris, W. E., & Veenhoven, R. (2000). Stability of life-satisfaction over time: Analysis of change in ranks in a national population. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1, 177–205. doi:10.1023/A:1010084410679. CrossRef
- Haisken-De New, J. P., & Frick, J. (2005). Desktop companion to the German Socio-Economic Panel Study (GSOEP). Berlin: DIW.
- Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (1995). The trait-state-error model for multi-wave data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 52–59. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.63.1.52. CrossRef
- Kenny, D. A., & Zautra, A. (2001). The trait-state models for longitudinal data. In L. M. Collins & A. G. Sayer (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 243–263). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. CrossRef
- Lance, C. E., Butts, M. M., & Michels, L. C. (2006). The sources of four commonly reported cutoff criteria: What did they really say? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 202–220. doi:10.1177/1094428105284919. CrossRef
- Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2009). Mplus user’s guide (5th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
- Schimmack, U., & Lucas, R. E. (2010). Environmental influences on well-being: A dyadic latent panel analysis of spousal similarity. Social Indicators Research, 98, 1–21. CrossRef
- Schimmack, U., Wagner, G. G., Krause, P., & Schupp, J. (2010). Stability and change of well being: An experimentally enhanced latent state-trait-error analysis. Social Indicators Research, 95, 19–31. CrossRef
- Taylor, M. F., Brice, J., Buck, N., & Prentice-Lane, E. (2004). British Household Panel Survey user manual volume A: Introduction, technical report, and appendices. Colchester: University of Essex. Available at: http://iserwww.essex.ac.uk/ulsc/bhps/doc/.
- Thompson, B. (Ed.). (2003). Score reliability: Contemporary thinking on reliability issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- University of Essex. Institute for Social and Economic Research. (2004). British Household Panel Survey; waves 1–12, 1991–2003 [computer file]. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive [distributor].
- Watson, N. (2010). HILDA user manual—release 8. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, University of Melbourne.
- Estimating the Reliability of Single-Item Life Satisfaction Measures: Results from Four National Panel Studies
Social Indicators Research
Volume 105, Issue 3 , pp 323-331
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Life satisfaction
- STARTS model
- Longitudinal analyses
- Panel studies
- Industry Sectors