Skip to main content
Log in

Testing the Personal Wellbeing Index on 12–16 Year-Old Adolescents in 3 Different Countries with 2 New Items

  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The 7-item adult version of the Personal Wellbeing scale (Cummins et al. Social Indic Res 64:159–190, 2003) was administered to two samples of adolescents aged 12–16 in Brazil (N = 1,588) and Spain (N = 2,900), and to a sample of adolescents aged 14–16 in Chile (N = 843). The results obtained were analyzed to determine its psychometric characteristics when used with adolescents in the three different countries and to check whether two additional items would improve its qualities. Results reveal that the new PWI-9 version worked well with the adolescents in the three countries, improving some of the qualities of the PWI-7. One of the added items, satisfaction with oneself, appears to be a major contributor to unique explained variance when regressed on the single-item of overall life satisfaction (OLS). The model we present using structural equations shows good fit statistics for the factor structure, with both 7 and 9 items. Separate in-country analyses demonstrate that cultural context has a strong influence on correlations and saturations between the studied variables and also on the explained variance. Probably related to this fact, the Model fit structure is good in Brazil (with a low PWI variance accounted for by its predictors) and Spain (medium), but rather modest in Chile, where data show a high proportion of the PWI variance accounted for by its predictors. However, a multi-group factor analysis among the three countries restricting saturations to 1 in each country in order to make data comparable across countries still show a good fit of the proposed model for both PWI-7 and PWI-9.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS® Amos™ 19 user’s guide. Crawfordville (Fl). Amos Development Corporation.

  • Batista-Foguet, J. M., & Coenders, G. (2000). Modelos de ecuaciones estructurales. La Muralla: Madrid.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brannick, M. T. (1995). Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 16, 201–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1989). Single sample cross-validation indices for covariance structures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 24, 445–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications and programming (2nd ed.). NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., & Rogers, W. L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations, and satisfactions. Nueva York: Russell Sage.

  • Casas, F., Baltatescu, S., González, M., & Hatos, A. (2009a). Similarities and differences in the PWI of Romanian and Spanish adolescents aged 13–16 years-old. Conference presentation. International Society for Quality of Life Studies. Florence, July 19–23.

  • Casas, F., Figuer, C., González, M., Malo, S., Alsinet, C., & Subarroca, S. (2007). The wellbeing of 12- to 16-year-old adolescents and their parents: Results from 1999 to 2003 Spanish samples. Social Indicators Research, 83(1), 87–115. doi:10.1007/s11205-006-9059-1.

  • Casas, F., González, M., Figuer, C., & Malo, S. (2009b). Satisfaction with spirituality, satisfaction with religion and personal well-being among Spanish adolescents and young university students. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4, 23–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 233–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioural sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., & Cahill, J. (2000). Avances en la comprensión de la calidad de vida subjetiva. Intervención Psicosocial, 9(2), 185–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Lo, S. K., Okerstrom, E., Hunter, B., & Davern, M. (2004). Australian unity wellbeing index: Cumulative psychometric record. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, School of Psychology, Deakin University. http://acqol.deakin.edu.au/index_wellbeing/index.htm.

  • Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J., & Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: The Australian unity wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. A., & Gullone, E. (2000). Why we should not use 5-point Likert scales: The case for subjective quality of life measurement. Proceedings, second international conference on quality of life in cities (pp. 74–93). Singapore: National University of Singapore. http://acqol.deakin.edu.au/instruments/PWI/2000-QOL_in_Cities-Likert_Scales-ss.doc.

  • Cummins, R. A. & Lau, A. L. D. (2005). Personal wellbeing index—school children (PWI-SC) (English) 3rd ed. Manual. Reviewed May 2006. http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/PWI/PWI-school.pdf.

  • Huebner, E. S. (1994). Preliminary development and validation of a multidimensional life satisfaction scale of children. Psychological Assessment, 6(2), 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Wellbeing Group. (2006). Personal wellbeing index—adult—manual, 4th version. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University. http://www.deakin.edu.au/research/acqol/instruments/wellbeing_index.htm.

  • Kelloway, E. K. (1995). Structural equation modeling in perspective. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 16, 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, A. L. D., Cummins, R. A., & McPherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the personal wellbeing index. Social Indicators Research, 72, 403–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligson, J. L., Huebner, E. S., & Valois, R. F. (2003). Preliminary validation of the brief multidimensional student’s life satisfaction scale. Social Indicators Research, 61, 121–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomyn, A. J., & Cummins, R. A. (2010). The subjective wellbeing of high-school students: Validating the personal wellbeing index—school children. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-010-9668-6.

  • West, S. G., Finch, J. F., & Curran, P. J. (1995). Structural equation models with nonnormal variables: Problems and remedies. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 56–75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Wills, E. (2009). Spirituality and subjective wellbeing: Evidences for a new domain in the personal wellbeing index. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 49–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The Spanish research presented here has been funded by the Spanish Government’s Ministry of Science and Education, with reference number SEJ2007-62813/PS. Particular thanks are due to Germà Coenders for his support in clarifying some of the methodological aspects presented, to Adrian Tomyn for his comments on the draft manuscript and to Barney Griffiths for editing English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ferran Casas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Casas, F., Sarriera, J.C., Alfaro, J. et al. Testing the Personal Wellbeing Index on 12–16 Year-Old Adolescents in 3 Different Countries with 2 New Items. Soc Indic Res 105, 461–482 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9781-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9781-1

Keywords

Navigation