Social Indicators Research

, 95:1

Was Hercules Happy? Some Answers from a Functional Model of Human Well-being

  • Joar Vittersø
  • Yngvil Søholt
  • Audun Hetland
  • Irina Alekseeva Thoresen
  • Espen Røysamb
Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11205-009-9447-4

Cite this article as:
Vittersø, J., Søholt, Y., Hetland, A. et al. Soc Indic Res (2010) 95: 1. doi:10.1007/s11205-009-9447-4

Abstract

The article proposes a functional approach as a framework for the analysis of human well-being. The model posits that the adaptive role of hedonic feelings is to regulate stability and homeostasis in human systems, and that these feelings basically are created in states of equilibrium or assimilation. To regulate change and growth, a distinct set of feelings exists, which may be labeled eudaimonic feelings. Eudaimonic feelings are produced to motivate behavior in challenging environments, when a quick return to equilibrium is dysfunctional, or when accommodation of cognitive structures is needed for a stimulus or event to be perceived as meaningful. It was hypothesized that a trait-like concern for evaluation of outcomes in terms of goodness or badness, referred to as hedonic orientation, will moderate the relation between equilibrium/assimilation and hedonic feelings. The model also includes the concept of eudaimonic orientation, reflecting a stable tendency to get involved in challenging activities and to create and strive after demanding goals. It was hypothesized that a eudaimonic, and not a hedonic, orientation moderates hedonic feelings in challenging episodes. Three different studies gave empirical support to the model.

Keywords

Life satisfactionPersonal growthPleasureInterestChallengeFunctional well-being

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joar Vittersø
    • 1
  • Yngvil Søholt
    • 1
  • Audun Hetland
    • 1
  • Irina Alekseeva Thoresen
    • 1
  • Espen Røysamb
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  3. 3.Norwegian Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway