Date: 24 Nov 2007
Differential Item Functioning of a Family Affluence Scale: Validation Study on Data from HBSC 2001/02
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Methodology for making cross-national comparisons is an area of increasing interest in social and public health related research. When studying socio-economic differences in health outcomes cross-nationally, there are several methodological issues of concern, especially when data is derived from self-reported questionnaires. Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (Currie et al. 1998) is a WHO cross-national study using school samples. HBSC provides comparable data, and thereby a unique opportunity to study associations between social indicators and health outcomes within an international perspective. In 2001/02 data was collected from a total of 162,323 children in 32 countries (Austria, Belgium, Canada, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Greenland, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom, USA.). Studies of social inequalities requires that a comparable measure of socio-economic position (SEP) is in use. HBSC has developed a proxy for social position measuring material wealth, the Family Affluence Scale (FAS). This paper studies FAS and whether it is comparable across population subgroups defined by country, age and gender. Initial analysis revealed that an item measuring perceived family wealth was a valid FAS item. Including this item in the FAS score will improve the reliability of FAS. Graphical log-linear Rasch models (GLLRM) showed that FAS contain differential item functioning (DIF) with respect to country, age, and gender as well as local dependency (LD) between items. During the analysis, test equating techniques where used to adjust for the test bias generated by DIF. We recommend that the equated scores are used whenever FAS is included as a variable. This study suggests that HBSC-FAS should contain five items (additional item: perceived family wealth) when analysing data from HBSC 2001/02, and furthermore that each country should adjust for the DIF or make use of the converted FAS scores provided. If using FAS as a proxy for social position at an international level, it is not advised to compare the absolute levels of FAS, but weigh the scale by ridit transformation.
Andersen, E. B. (1973) A goodness of fit test for the Rasch model. Psychometrika, 38, 123–140.CrossRef
Batista-Foguet, J. M., Fortiana, J., Currie, C., & Villalbi, J. R. (2006) Socio-economic indexes in surveys for comparisons between countries. Social Indicators Research, 67, 315–332.CrossRef
Bjorner, J. B., Damsgaard, M. T., Watt, T., & Groenvold, M. (1998a) Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the Danish SF-36. Journal of Clinical Epidemioogy, 51, 1001–1011.CrossRef
Bjorner, J. B., Kreiner, S., Ware, J. E., Damsgaard, M. T., & Bech, P. (1998b) Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. Journal of Clinical Epidemioogy, 51, 1189–1202.CrossRef
Borsboom, D. (2005). Measuring the mind. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Carstairs, V., & Morris, R. (1990) Deprivation and health in Scotland. Health Bulletin (Edinburgh), 48, 162–175.
Christensen, K. B., Bjørner, J. (2003) Sas macros for Rasch based latent variable modelling. Technical report 03/13. Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen.
Christensen, K. B., Bjørner, J., Kreiner, S., & Petersen, J. H. (2004). Latent regression in log linear Rasch models. Communications in Statistics, 33, 1295–1314.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955/2006). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302 (Reprinted in Bartholomew, D. J. (Ed.) (2006). Measurement. Vol. I (pp. 277–306). London, Sage Publications).CrossRef
Currie, C. et al. (1998). Health behaviour in school-aged children: a WHO cross-national survey (HBSC), Research Protocol for the 1997/98 Survey. Research Unit in Health and Behvioural Change. 1998. Edinburgh, World Health Organisation. Ref Type: Report.
Currie, C. E., Elton, R. A., Todd, J., & Platt, S. (1997) Indicators of socioeconomic status for adolescents: the WHO Health Behaviour in School-aged Children Survey. Health Education Research, 12, 385–397.CrossRef
Due, P., Holstein, B .E., Lynch, J., Diderichsen, F., Gabhain, S. N., Scheidt, P., & Currie, C. (2005) Bullying and symptoms among school-aged children: international comparative cross sectional study in 28 countries. European Journal of Public Health, 15, 128–132.CrossRef
Elgar, F. J., Roberts, C., Parry-Langdon, N., & Boyce, W. (2005) Income inequality and alcohol use: a multilevel analysis of drinking and drunkenness in adolescents in 34 countries. European Journal of Public Health, 15, 245–250.CrossRef
Kane, M. T. (2006) Validation (p.17–65). In R. L. Brennan (Eds.), Educational measurement, 4th edn. Westport: Praeger Publishers.
Kelderman, H. (1984) Loglinear Rasch Tests 49. Psychometrika, 49, 223–245.CrossRef
Kreiner, S., & Christensen, K. B. (2002) Graphical Rasch models. In M. Mesbah, B. F. Cole, & M. T. Lee (Eds.), Statistical methods for quality of life studies. Design, measurements and analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 187–203.
Kreiner, S., & Christensen, K. B. (2004) Analysis of local dependence and multidimensionality in graphical loglinear Rasch models. Communications in Statistics— Theory and Methods, 33, 1239–1276.CrossRef
Kreiner, S., & Christensen, K. B. (2006) Validity and objectivity in health related summated scales: Analysis by graphical log-linear Rasch models. In M. von Davier, C. H. Carstensen (Eds.), Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models. Extensions and applications. New York: Springer Verlag.
Kreiner, S. (2007) Validity and objectivity. Reflections on the role and nature of Rasch models. Nordic Psychology, 59, 268–298.CrossRef
Lien, N., Friestad, C., & Klepp, K. I. (2001) Adolescents’ proxy reports of parents’ socioeconomic status: How valid are they? Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 55, 731–737.CrossRef
Mackenbach, J. P., & Bakker, M. J. (2002) Reducing inequalities in health: A European perspective. London: Routledge.
Rasch, G. (1966) An item analysis which takes individual differences into account. TheBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 19, 49–57.
Rosenbaum, P. R. (1989) Criterion-related construct validity. Psychometrika, 54, 625–633.CrossRef
Torsheim, T., Currie, C., Boyce, W., Kalnins, I., Overpeck, M., & Haugland, S. (2004) Material deprivation and self-rated health: a multilevel study of adolescents from 22 European and North American countries. Social Science and Medicine, 59, 1–12.CrossRef
Torsheim, T., Currie, C., Boyce, W., & Samdal, O. (2006) Country material distribution and adolescents’ perceived health: multilevel study of adolescents in 27 countries. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 156–161.CrossRef
Townsend, P. (1987) Deprivation. Journal of Social Policy, 16, 125–146.CrossRef
Vereecken, C. A., Inchley, J., Subramanian, S. V., Hublet, A., & Maes, L. (2005) The relative influence of individual and contextual socio-economic status on consumption of fruit and soft drinks among adolescents in Europe. European Journal of Public Health, 15, 224–232.CrossRef
Wardle, J., Robb, K., & Johnson, F. (2002) Assessing socioeconomic status in adolescents: the validity of a home affluence scale. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 56, 595–599.CrossRef
Whitehead, M., Diderichsen, F., & Burstrom, B. (2000) Researching the impact of public policy on inequalities in health. In H. Graham (Ed.), Understanding health inequalities. London: Open University Press.
Zumbo, B. D. (2007) Validity: Foundational issues and statistical methodology. In: C. R. Rao, & S. Sinharay (Eds.), Handbook of Statistics, volume 26: Psychometrics. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
- Differential Item Functioning of a Family Affluence Scale: Validation Study on Data from HBSC 2001/02
Social Indicators Research
Volume 89, Issue 1 , pp 79-95
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Family affluence scale
- Differential item functioning
- Health Behaviour in School-aged Children (HBSC)
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Social Medicine, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Oester Farimagsgade 5, P.O. Box 2099, Copenhagen, 1014, Denmark
- 2. Department of Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- 3. Child and Adolescent Health Research Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland
- 4. McArthur Hall, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada