Arrindell, W. A., Heesink, J., & Feij, J. A. (1999). The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Appraisal with 1700 health young adults in the Netherlands. Personality and Individual Differences, 26
Arrindell, W. A., Meeuwesen, L., & Huyse, F. J. (1991). The Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS): Psychometric properties in a non-psychiatric medical outpatients sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 12
Atienza, F. L., Balaguer, I., & Garcia-Merita, M. L. (2003). Satisfaction with Life Scale: Analysis of factorial invariance across sexes. Personality and Individual Differences, 35
Barrett, P. Structural equation modeling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences (in press).
Beauducel, A., & Wittmann, W. (2005). Simulation study on fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis based on data with slightly distorted simple structure. Structural Equation Modeling, 12
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Cohen, E. H. (2000). A facet theory approach to examining overall and life facetsatisfaction relationships. Social Indicators Research, 51
Davis, M. H., Morris, M. M., & Kraus, L. A. (1998). Relationship-specific and globalperceptions of social support: Associations with well-being and attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95
Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49
Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R., & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125
Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2005). Sensitivity of fit indexes to misspecified structural or measurement model components: Rationale of two-index strategy revisited. Structural Equation Modeling, 12
Goffin, R. D. Assessing the adequacy of structural equation models: Golden rules and editorial policies. Personality and Individual Differences (in press).
Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications (pp. 1–15). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hsieh, C. M. (2003). Counting importance: The case of life satisfaction and relative domain importance. Social Indicators Research, 61
Hsieh, C. M. (2004). To weight or not to weight: The role of domain importance in quality of life measurement. Social Indicators Research, 68
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6
Joreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lance, C. E., Mallard, A. G., & Michalos, A. C. (1995). Tests of the causal directions of global-life facet satisfaction relationships. Social Indicators Research, 34
Lewis, C. A., Shevlin, M. E., Bunting, B. P., & Joseph, S. (1995). Confirmatory factor analysis of the satisfaction with life scale: Replication and methodological refinement. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 80, 304–306.
Lucas, R. E., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of well-being measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71
Markland, D. The golden rule is that there are no golden rules: A commentary on Paul Barrett’s recommendations for reporting model fit in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences (in press).
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of Golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler’s (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McIntosh, C. N. Rethinking fit assessment in structural equation modeling: A commentary and elaboration on Barrett. Personality and Individual Differences (in press).
Pavot, W., & Diener, E. (1993). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. Psychological Assessment, 5
Pavot, W., Diener, E., Colvin, C. R., & Sandvik, E. (1991). Further validation of the satisfaction evidence for the cross-method convergence of well-being. Social Indicators Research 28
Ratwani, R. M., Trafton, J. G., & Boehm-Davis, D. A. (2003). ‘Thinking graphically: Extracting local and global information. In R. Alterman & D. Kirsch (Eds.), 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Boston, MA: Erlbaum.
Russell, L. B., Hubley, A. M., Palepu, A., & Zumbo, B. D. (2006). Does weighting capture what’s important? Revisiting subjective importance weighting with a quality of life measure. Social Indicators Research, 75
Sachs, J. (2003). Validation of the Satisfaction with Life Scale in a sample of Hong Kong University students. Psychologia, 46
Shevlin, M. E., Brunsden, V., & Miles, J. N. V. (1998). Satisfaction with Life Scale: Analysis of factorial invariance, mean structures and reliability. Personality and Individual Differences, 25
Shevlin, M. E., & Bunting, B. P. (1994). Confirmatory factor analysis of the satisfaction with life scale. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 1316–1318.
The WHOQOL Group (1998a). Development of the WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment. Psychological Medicine, 28
The WHOQOL Group (1998b). The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties. Social Science & Medicine, 46
Westaway, M. S., Maritz, C., & Golele, N. J. (2003). Empirical testing of the satisfaction with life scale: A South African pilot study. Psychological Reports, 92
Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006a). Do we need to weight satisfaction scores with importance ratings? Social Indicators Research, 78
Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006b). Do we need to weight item satisfaction by item importance? A perspective from Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis. Social Indicators Research, 79
Wu, C. H., & Yao, G. (2006c). Analysis of factorial invariance across genders in the Taiwan version of the satisfaction with life scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 40
Yao, G., Chung, C. W., Yu, C. F., & Wang, J. D. (2002). Development and verification of reliability and validity of the WHOHR-QOL-BREF Taiwan version. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 101, 342–351.
Yuan, K. H. (2005). Fit indices versus test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40