Abstract
Prior research has explored perceptions of intimate partner violence (IPV), and how these perceptions differ based on gender of the participant, victim, and perpetrator. In the current study, 178 undergraduate students (n = 88 males; n = 90 females) attending a university in the Southwestern United States read a hypothetical IPV scenario, experimentally crossed by victim gender and perpetrator gender, and completed measures exploring gender (i.e., participant gender, victim gender, and perpetrator gender) and situational perceptions on participants’ intended responses to an IPV scenario. Results indicated that perceptions of the IPV situation and responses varied by genders of the participant, victim, and perpetrator. Specifically, males were more likely than females to hold the victim responsible for the violence, and ignore the situation; females were more likely than males to encourage the victim to seek professional help and seek help from another person regarding the IPV scenario as presented in the vignette. When the victim was a male, participants viewed the situation as less serious, the victim as more responsible, and were more likely to ignore the situation, than when the victim was female. Overall, results indicated that gender factors (especially participant gender) had a stronger and more consistent influence on responses to the IPV scenario than perceptions of the situation. The findings of the current study are discussed in light of implications for future research to expand an understanding of the role of gender and perceptions influencing anticipated helping behavior for victims of IPV, which will inform intervention.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arnett, J. J. (2010a). Adolescence and emerging adulthood: A cultural approach (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.
Arnett, J. J. (2010b). Oh, grow up! Generational grumbling and the new life stage of emerging adulthood. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5, 89–92. doi:10.1177/1745691609357016.
Arnett, J. J. (2011). Emerging adulthood(s): The cultural psychology of a new life stage. In L. A. Jensen (Ed.), Bridging cultural and developmental psychology: New syntheses in theory, research, and policy (pp. 255–275). New York: Oxford University Press.
Baker, N. L., Buik, J. D., Kim, S. R., Moniz, S., & Nava, K. L. (2013). Lessons from examinig same-sex intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 69, 182–192. doi:10.1007/s11199-012-0218-3.
Bartholomew, K., Regan, K. V., Oram, D., & White, M. A. (2008). Correlates of partner abuse in male same-sex relationships. Violence and Victims, 23, 344–360. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.23.3.344.
Beeble, M. L., Post, L. A., Bybee, D., & Sullivan, C. M. (2008). Factors related to willingness to help survivors of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 1717–1729. doi:10.1177/0886260508314333.
Bethke, T. M., & DeJoy, D. M. (1993). An experimental study of factors influencing the acceptability of dating violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 8, 36–51. doi:10.1177/088626093008001003.
Beyers, J. M., Leonard, J. M., Mays, V. K., & Rosen, L. A. (2000). Gender differences in the perception of courtship abuse. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15, 451–466. doi:10.1177/088626000015005001.
Brown, M. J., & Groscup, J. (2009). Perceptions of same-sex domestic violence among crisis center staff. Journal of Family Violence, 24, 87–93. doi:10.1007/s10896-008-9212-5.
Burke, L. K., & Follingstad, D. R. (1999). Violence in lesbian and gay relationships: Theory, prevalence, and correlational factors. Clinical Psychology Review, 19, 487–512. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(98)00054-3.
Carlson, B. E., & Worden, A. P. (2005). Attitudes and beliefs about domestic violence: Results of a public opinion survey: I. Definitions of domestic violence, criminal domestic violence, and prevalence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 1197–1218. doi:10.1177/0886260505278530.
Carney, M. M., & Barner, J. R. (2012). Prevalence of partner abuse: Rates of emotional abuse and control. Partner Abuse, 3, 286–235. doi:10.1891/1946-6560.3.3.286.
Chabot, H. F., Tracy, T. L., Manning, C. A., & Poisson, C. A. (2009). Sex, attribution, and severity influence intervention decisions of informal helpers in domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24, 1696–1713. doi:10.1177/0886260509331514.
Cormier, N. S., & Woodworth, M. T. (2008). Do you see what I see? The influence of gender stereotypes on student and Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) perceptions of violence same-sex and opposite-sex relationships. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 17, 478–505. doi:10.1080/10926770802463446.
Delgado, A. R., Prieto, G., & Bond, R. (1997). The cultural factor in lay perception of jealousy as a motive for wife battery. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, 1824–1841. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1997.tb01627.x.
Desmarais, S. L., Reeves, K. A., Nicholls, T. L., Telford, R. P., & Fiebert, M. S. (2012a). Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships, part 1: Rates of male and female victimization. Partner Abuse, 3, 140–169. doi:10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.140.
Desmarais, S. L., Reeves, K. A., Nicholls, T. L., Telford, R. P., & Fiebert, M. S. (2012b). Prevalence of physical violence in intimate relationships, part 2: Rates of male and female perpetration. Partner Abuse, 3, 170–198. doi:10.1891/1946-6560.3.2.170.
Duke, A., & Davidson, M. M. (2009). Same-sex intimate partner violence research: Lesbian, gay, and bisexual affirmative outreach and advocacy. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 18, 795–816. doi:10.1080/10926770903291787.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social role interpretation. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64, 644–658. doi:10.1037/0003-66X.64.8.644.
Feather, N. T. (1996). Domestic violence, gender, and perceptions of justice. Sex Roles, 35, 507–519. doi:10.1007/BF01544134.
Felson, R. B. (2000). The normative protection of women from violence. Sociological Forum, 15, 91–116. doi:10.1023/A:1007598204631.
Felson, R. B., & Feld, S. L. (2009). When a man hits a woman: Moral evaluations and reporting violence to the police. Aggressive Behavior, 35, 477–488. doi:10.1002/ab.20323.
Flood, M., & Pease, B. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 10, 125–142. doi:10.1177/1524838009334131.
Foshee, V., & Linder, G. F. (1997). Factors influencing service provider motivation to help adolescent victims of partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 648–664. doi:10.1177/088626097012005003.
Gilbert, L., Poorman, P. B., & Simmons, S. (1990). Guidelines for mental health systems response to lesbian battering. In P. Elliott (Ed.), Confronting lesbian battering: A manual for the battered women’s movement (pp. 105–117). St. Paul: Minnesota Coalition for Battered Women.
Greenwood, G. L., Relf, M. V., Huang, B., Pollack, L. M., Canchola, J. A., & Catania, J. A. (2002). Battering victimization among a probability-based sample of men who have sex with men. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1964–1969. doi:10.2105/AJPH.92.12.1964.
Halpern, C. T., Young, M. L., Waller, M. W., Martin, S. L., & Kupper, L. L. (2004). Prevalence of partner violence in same-sex romantic and sexual relationships in a national sample of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35, 124–131. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2003.09.003.
Hamby, S., & Jackson, A. (2010). Size does matter: The effects of gender on perceptions of dating violence. Sex Roles, 63, 324–331. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9816-0.
Harris, R. J., & Cook, C. A. (1994). Attributions about spouse abuse: It matters who the batterers and victims are. Sex Roles, 30, 553–565. doi:10.1007/BF01420802.
Hassouneh, D., & Glass, N. (2008). The influence of gender role stereotyping on women’s experiences of female same-sex intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 14, 310–325. doi:10.1177/1077801207313734.
Herzog, S. (2007). An empirical test of feminist theory and research: The effect of heterogeneous gender role attitudes on perceptions of intimate partner violence. Feminist Criminology, 2, 223–244. doi:10.1177/1557085107301836.
Hines, D. A., & Saudino, K. J. (2003). Gender differences in psychological, physical, and sexual aggression among college students using the revised conflict tactics scales. Violence and Victims, 18, 197–217. doi:10.1891/vivi.2003.18.2.197.
Hutchinson, K. M. (2012). Predictors of college students’ dating violence perceptions and help-seeking recommendations (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.ohiolink.edu/etd.
Latané, B., & Darley, J. (1968). Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 215–221. doi:10.1037/h0026570.
Lehmann, M., & Santilli, N. R. (1996). Sex differences in perceptions of spousal abuse. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 229–238.
Little, B., & Terrance, C. (2010). Perceptions of domestic violence in lesbian relationship: Stereotypes and gender role expectations. Journal of Homosexuality, 57, 429–440. doi:10.1080/00918360903543170.
Merrill, G. S. (1996). Ruling the exceptions: Same-sex battering and domestic violence theory. Journal of Gay & Lesbian Social Services, 4, 9–22. doi:10.1300/j041v04n01_02.
Miller, L. M. (2011). Physical abuse in a college setting: A study of perceptions and participation in abusive dating relationships. Journal of Family Violence, 26, 71–80. doi:10.1007/s10896-010-9344-2.
Owarish-Gross, J. (2012). Do gender and relationship composition affect college students’ perceptions of intimate partner violence severity? (Senior thesis). Retrieved from http://digitalrepository.trincoll.edu/theses/199.
Poorman, P. B., Seelau, E. P., & Seelau, S. M. (2003). Perceptions of domestic abuse in same-sex relationships and implications for criminal justice and mental health responses. Violence and Victims, 18, 659–669. doi:10.1891/vivi.2003.18.6.659.
Rayburn, N. R., Jaycox, L. H., McCaffrey, D. F., Ulloa, E. C., Zander-Cotungo, M., Marshall, G. N., & Shelley, G. A. (2007). Reactions to dating violence among Latino teenagers: An experiment utilizing the articulated thought in simulated situations paradigm. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 893–915. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2006.11.005.
Rhatigan, D. L., Stewart, C., & Moore, T. M. (2011). Effects of gender and confrontation on attributions of female-perpetrated intimate partner violence. Sex Roles, 64, 875–887. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-9951-2.
Seelau, S. M., & Seelau, E. M. (2005). Gender-role stereotypes and perceptions of heterosexual, gay and lesbian domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 363–371. doi:10.1007/s10896-005-7798-4.
Seelau, E. P., Seelau, S. M., & Poorman, P. B. (2003). Gender and role-based perceptions of domestic abuse: Does sexual orientation matter? Behavior Sciences and the Law, 21, 199–214. doi:10.1002/bsl.524.
Sylaska, K. M., & Edwards, K. M. (2014). Disclosure of intimate partner violence to informal social support network members: A review of the literature. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 15, 3–21. doi:10.1177/1524838013496335.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Taylor, C. A., & Sorenson, S. B. (2005). Community-based norms about intimate partner violence: Putting attributions of fault and responsibility into context. Sex Roles, 53, 573–589. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-7143-7.
Terrance, C. A., Plumm, K. A., & Thomas, S. A. (2011). Perceptions of domestic violence in heterosexual relationships: Impact of victim gender and history of response. Partner Abuse, 2, 208–223. doi:10.1891/1946-6560.2.2.208.
West, A., & Wandrei, M. L. (2002). Intimate partner violence: A model for predicting interventions by informal helpers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 17, 972–986. doi:10.1177/0886260502017009004.
Williams, J. R., Ghandour, R. M., & Kub, J. E. (2008). Female perpetration of violence in heterosexual intimate relationships: Adolescence through adulthood. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 9, 227–249. doi:10.1177/1524838008324418.
Zemsky, B. (1990). Lesbian battering: Considerations for intervention. In P. Elliott (Ed.), Confronting lesbian battering: A manual for the battered women’s movement (pp. 64–67). St. Paul: Minnesota Coalition for Battered Women.
Acknowledgments
We thank Edward O’Brien for his statistical assistance.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
Sample Vignette: Female Perpetrator/Male Victim
Josh is one of your best friends. The two of you have been friends since early high school and have remained close since coming to college. Josh has been in a dating relationship with Julie for about 10 months. You’ve hung out with Josh and Julie together and feel that they make a good couple; Josh has told you that he’s in love with Julie and you have sensed that Josh seems very happy with his life.
Since the school year started, Josh has mentioned casually some of Julie’s behavior that has made you suspicious of their relationship. Julie has been starting fights quite frequently because she is jealous that Josh spends much of his time with other women; Julie genuinely believes that Josh is cheating on her. Julie gets very heated during these fights and, in her anger, has been known to throw things around the room. Based on these conversations with Josh, you have noticed that these fights have been happening more and more frequently. This morning, you saw Josh and noticed that he has some deep purple-ish bruises around his lower arm, as well as a long scratch along the side of his forehead. After you made a comment to Josh about these injuries, he said that last night he slipped on a wet stair and fell. Josh then laughed nervously and quickly changed the topic. You suspect, however, that these injuries are due to a fight between Julie and Josh, which you sense has turned physically violent.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sylaska, K.M., Walters, A.S. Testing the Extent of the Gender Trap: College Students’ Perceptions of and Reactions to Intimate Partner Violence. Sex Roles 70, 134–145 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0344-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0344-1