Abstract
The present study was designed to examine the impact of display rules and gender-emotion stereotypes on French children’s depiction of sadness and anger in their drawings of a human face. Participants were 172 school-aged French children (74 boys and 98 girls), who attended state schools in a middle-class district of a southern French city. The exact age range was as followed: 6 years 2 months to 8 years 1 month. They were asked to draw the emotion felt by a character (either male or female) after being told a scenario eliciting sadness and a scenario eliciting anger. By never mentioning the emotion felt by the character, we expected children’s interpretation of these scenarios to be therefore influenced by their own gender and/or by the character’s gender. Results indicate that anger is depicted by more boys than girls in response to the angry scenario, for male as well as for female characters. Furthermore, among the children who did depict anger, the expressive intensity of the drawings was scored lower for children who were presented the feminine character than for children who were presented the masculine character. However, no effect of gender was found on the drawings produced in response to the sad scenario. These results are discussed in terms of the influence of display rules and gender-emotion stereotypes on children. We also suggest some methodological and clinical implications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baldy, R. (2002). Dessine-moi un bonhomme. Dessins d’enfants et développement cognitif [Draw me a human figure. Children’s drawings and cognitive development]. Paris: In Press Editions.
Bekhit, N. S., Thomas, G. V., & Jolley, R. P. (2005). The use of drawing for psychological assessment in Britain: Survey findings. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 78, 205–217. doi:10.1348/147608305X26044.
Berti, A. E., & Freeman, N. H. (1997). Representational change in resources for pictorial innovations: A three-component analysis. Cognitive Development, 12, 501–522. doi:10.1016/S0885-2014(97)90020-4.
Birnbaum, D. W., & Chemelski, B. E. (1984). Preschoolers’ inferences about gender and emotion: The mediation of emotionality stereotypes. Sex Roles, 10, 505–511. doi:10.1007/BF00287259.
Birnbaum, D. W., & Croll, W. L. (1984). The etiology of children’s stereotypes about sex differences in emotionality. Sex Roles, 10, 677–691. doi:10.1007/BF00287379.
Birnbaum, D. W., Nosanchuk, T. A., & Croll, W. L. (1980). Children’s stereotypes about sex differences in emotionality. Sex Roles, 6, 435–443. doi:10.1007/BF00287363.
Blanc, N. (2010). The comprehension of the tales between 5 and 7 year-olds: Which representation of emotional information? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 256–265. doi:10.1037/a0021283.
Brechet, C., Picard, D., & Baldy, R. (2007). Expression des émotions dans le dessin d’un homme chez l’enfant de 5 à 11 ans [Expression of emotions in the drawing of a man in the 5 to 11-year-old child]. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 142–153. doi:10.1037/cjep2007015.
Brechet, C., Baldy, R., & Picard, D. (2009). How does Sam feel?: Children’s labelling and drawing of basic emotions. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 587–606. doi:10.1348/026151008X345564.
Brody, L. R., Lovas, G. S., & Hay, D. H. (1995). Gender differences in anger and fear as a function of situational context. Sex Roles, 32, 47–79. doi:10.1007/BF01544757.
Brooks, M. (2005). Drawing as a unique mental development tool for young children: Interpersonal and intrapersonal dialogues. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 6, 80–91. doi:10.2304/ciec.2005.6.1.11.
Brosnan, M. J. (1999). A new methodology, an old story? Gender differences in the ‘draw-computer-user’ test. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, 375–385. doi:10.1007/BF03173121.
Buck, J. N. (1948). The HTP test. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 4, 151–159. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(194804)4:2<151::AID-JCLP2270040203>3.0.CO;2-O.
Burkitt, E., & Barrett, M. (2010). Child and adult reports of graphic strategies used to portray figures with contrasting emotional characteristics. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 169–190. doi:10.1002/j.2162-6057.2010.tb01332.x.
Camara, W. J., Nathan, J. S., & Puente, A. E. (2000). Psychological test usage: Implications in professional psychology. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 31, 141–154. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.31.2.141.
Chambers, D. W. (1983). Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science Education, 67, 255–265. doi:10.1002/sce.3730670213.
Chan, D., & Lee, H. (1995). Patterns of psychological test usage in Hong Kong in 1993. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 292–297. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.26.3.292.
Colley, A., Berman, E., & van Millingen, L. (2005). Age and gender differences in young people’s perceptions of sport participants. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 1440–1454. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02178.x.
Collignon, O., Girard, S., Gosselin, F., Saint-Amour, D., Lepore, F., & Lassonde, M. (2010). Women process multisensory emotion expressions more efficiently than men. Neuropsychologia, 48, 220–225. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.007.
Cox, M. V. (1993). Children’s drawings of the human figure. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cox, M. V. (2005). The pictorial world of the child. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dafflon Novelle, A. (2006). Filles-garçons: Socialisation différenciée? [Girls and boys: Differentiated socialization?]. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
Fischer, A. H. (2000). Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fournier, J. E., & Wineburg, S. S. (1997). Picturing the past: Gender differences in the depiction of historical figures. American Journal of Education, 105, 160–186. doi:10.1086/444151.
Freeman, N. H. (1980). Strategies of representation in young children: Analysis of spatial skills and drawing processes. London: Academic.
Freeman, N. H., & Cox, M. V. (1985). Visual order: The nature and development of pictorial representation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fuchs, D., & Thelen, M. H. (1988). Children’s expected interpersonal consequences of communicating their affective state and reported likelihood of expression. Child Development, 58, 1314–1322. doi:10.2307/1130494.
Golomb, C. (1992). The child’s creation of a pictorial world. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Golombok, S., & Rust, J. (1993). The preschool activities inventory: A standardized assessment of gender role in children. Psychological Assessment, 5, 131–136. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.5.2.131.
Gombrich, E. H. (1972). The visual image. Scientific American, 227(3), 82–96. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0972-82.
Goodnow, J. (1977). Children drawing. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Granié, M.-A. (2010). Gender stereotype conformity and age as determinants of preschoolers’ injury-risk behaviors. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 42, 726–733. doi:10.1016/j.aap. 2009.10.022.
Hall, J. A. (1978). Gender effects in decoding nonverbal cues. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 845–857. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.4.845.
Haugh, S. S., Hoffman, C. D., & Cowan, G. (1980). The eye of the very young beholder: Sex typing of infants by young children. Child Development, 51, 598–600. doi:10.2307/1129302.
Hofstede, G. H. (2003). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Hollis, S., & Low, J. (2005). Karmiloff-Smith’s RRM distinction between adjunctions and redescriptions: It’s about time (and children’s drawings). British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 623–644. doi:10.1348/026151005X35390.
Hubbard, J. A. (2001). Emotion expression processes in children’s peer interaction: The role of peer rejection, aggression, and gender. Child Development, 72, 1426–1438. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00357.
Ives, S. W. (1984). The development of expressivity in drawing. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 152–159. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1984.tb02575.x.
Jolley, R. P. (2009). Children and pictures: Drawing and understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.
Karbon, M., Fabes, R. A., Carlo, G., & Martin, C. L. (1992). Preschoolers’ beliefs about sex and age differences in emotionality. Sex Roles, 27, 377–390. doi:10.1007/BF00289946.
Koppitz, E. M. (1968). Psychological evaluation of children’s human figure drawings. New York: Grure & Stratton.
Kunda, Z., & Thagard, P. (1996). Forming impressions from stereotypes, traits, and behaviors: A parallel-constraint-satisfaction theory. Psychological Review, 103, 284–308. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.103.2.284.
Machover, K. (1949). Personality projection in the drawings of the human figure. Springfield: Thomas.
Malchiodi, C. A. (1998). Understanding children’s drawings. New York: Guilford Press.
McClure, E. B. (2000). A meta-analytic review of sex differences in facial expression processing and their development in infants, children and adolescents. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 424–453. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.3.424.
McNaughton, G. (2000). Rethinking gender in early childhood. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
Meerum Terwogt, M., & Olthof, T. (1989). Awareness and self-regulation of emotion in young children. In C. Saarni & P. L. Harris (Eds.), Children’s understanding of emotion (pp. 209–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Missaghi-Lakshman, M., & Whissell, C. (1991). Children’s understanding of facial expression of emotion: II. Drawing of emotion-faces. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72, 1228–1230. doi:10.2466/pms.1991.72.3c.1228.
Oliver, M. B., & Green, S. (2001). Development of gender differences in children’s responses to animated entertainment. Sex Roles, 45, 67–88. doi:10.1023/A:1013012401836.
Parmley, M., & Cunningham, J. (2007). Children’s gender-emotion stereotypes in the relationship of anger to sadness and fear. Sex Roles, 58, 358–370. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9335-9.
Picard, D., & Baldy, R. (2011). Le dessin de l’enfant et son usage dans la pratique psychologique [The use of children’s drawings in psychological assessment]. Développements, 10, 45–60.
Picard, D., & Boulhais, M. (2011). Sex differences in expressive drawing. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 850–855. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.017.
Saarni, C. (1979). Children’s understanding of display rules for expressive behavior. Developmental Psychology, 15, 424–429. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.15.4.424.
Sayil, M. (2001). Children’s drawings of emotional faces. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 493–505. doi:10.1348/026151001166218.
Sharpley, C. F., & Pain, M. D. (1988). Psychological test usage in Australia. Australian Psychologist, 23, 361–369. doi:10.1080/00050068808255618.
Soussignan, R., & Schaal, B. (1996). Children’s facial responsiveness to odors: Influences of hedonic valence of odor, gender, age and social presence. Developmental Psychology, 32, 367–379. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.367.
Syssau, A., & Monnier, C. (2009). Children’s emotional norms for 600 French words. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 213–219. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.1.213.
Watkins, C., Campbell, V., Nieberding, R., & Hallmark, R. (1995). Contemporary practice of psychological assessment by clinical psychologists. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 54–60. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.26.1.54.
Wester, S. R., Vogel, D. L., Pressly, P. K., & Heesacker, M. (2002). Sex differences in emotion: A critical review of the literature and implications for counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 630–652. doi:10.1177/00100002030004008.
Wieder, A., & Noller, P. A. (1950). Objective studies of children’s drawings of human figures. Part 1: Sex awareness and socioeconomic level. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 6, 319–325. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(195010)6:4<319::AID-JCLP2270060403>3.0.CO;2–8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brechet, C. Children’s Gender Stereotypes Through Drawings of Emotional Faces: Do Boys Draw Angrier Faces than Girls?. Sex Roles 68, 378–389 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0242-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0242-3