Feminism and Attachment Parenting: Attitudes, Stereotypes, and Misperceptions
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper investigated attitudes and stereotypes about what feminist women, primarily from the United States, believed about a number of practices associated with attachment parenting which is theorized to be both feminist and non-feminist. The goals of this study were to determine whether feminists endorsed attachment parenting and whether stereotypes of feminists’ beliefs corresponded to actual feminists’ attitudes. Women were recruited online, primarily through blogs, to complete an online survey about feminism and mothering. Four hundred and thirty one women comprised the sample for the current investigation and included heterosexual-identified feminist mothers (n = 147), feminist non-mothers (n = 75), non-feminist mothers (n = 143), and non-feminist non-mothers (n = 66). Participants were asked to rate their own attitudes towards specific practices associated with attachment parenting and to indicate their perceptions of the beliefs of the typical feminist. Results indicated that feminists were more supportive of attachment parenting practices than were non-feminists. Non-feminists, particularly mothers, held misperceptions about the typical feminist, seeing them as largely uninterested in the time-intensive and hands-on practices associated with attachment parenting. Feminist mothers also held stereotypes about feminists and saw themselves as somewhat atypical feminists who were more interested in attachment parenting than they thought was typical of feminists. Our data indicated that feminists did endorse attachment parenting and that stereotypes of feminists related to attachment parenting are untrue. Furthermore, the role of feminism in the identity of feminist mothers and whether attachment parenting is truly a feminist way to parent are discussed.
- Anderson, K. J., Kanner, M., & Elsayegh, N. (2009). Are feminists man haters? Feminists’ and nonfeminists’ attitudes toward men. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 216–224. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01491.x. CrossRef
- Arendell, T. (2000). Conceiving and investigating motherhood: The decade’s scholarship. Journal of Marriage & the Family, 62, 1192–1207. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.01192.x. CrossRef
- Badinter, E. (2011). The conflict: How modern motherhood undermines the status of women (trans: Hunter, A.). New York: Metropolitan Books.
- Berryman-Fink, C., & Verderber, K. S. (1985). Attributions of the term feminist: A factor analytic development of a measuring instrument. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, 51–64. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1985.tb00860.x. CrossRef
- Bialik, M. (2012, May 1). Attachment parenting is feminism [Online forum contribution]. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/04/30/motherhood-vs-feminism/attachment-parenting-is-feminism.
- Bobel, C. (2008). Resisting, but not too much: Interrogating the paradox of natural mothering. In J. Nathanson & L. C. Tuley (Eds.), Mother knows best: Talking back to the “experts” (pp. 113–123). Toronto: Demeter Press.
- Brewer, M. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 77, 475–82. doi:10.1177/0146167291175001. CrossRef
- Collins, P. H. (1994). Shifting the center: Race, class, and feminist theorizing about motherhood. In D. Bassin, M. Honey, & M. M. Kaplan (Eds.), Representations of motherhood (pp. 56–74). New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Conrad, R. (2009). Desiring relation: Mothers’ and children’s agency, subjectivity, and time—Commentary on Daphne de Marneffe’s Maternal desire. Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 10, 12–20. doi:10.1080/15240650802580407. CrossRef
- Crossley, M. L. (2009). Breastfeeding as a moral imperative: An autoethnographic study. Feminism & Psychology, 19, 71–87. doi:10.1177/0959353508098620. CrossRef
- de Marneffe, D. (2004). Maternal desire: On children, love and the inner life. New York: Little, Brown and Company.
- DeWall, C. N., Altermatt, T. W., & Thompson, H. (2005). Understanding the structure of stereotypes of women: Virtue and agency as dimensions distinguishing female subgroups. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 396–405. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00239.x. CrossRef
- Dillaway, H., & Paré, E. (2008). Locating mothers: How cultural debates about stay-at-home versus working mothers define women and home. Journal of Family Issues, 29, 437–464. doi:10.1177/0192513X07310309. CrossRef
- Douglas, S. J., & Michaels, M. W. (2004). The mommy myth: The idealization of motherhood and how it has undermined women. New York: Free Press.
- Ehrenreich, B., & English, E. (1978). For her own good: 150 years of the experts’ advice to women. New York: Doubleday.
- Etelson, E. (2007). Do real feminists attachment parent? Journal of Prenatal & Perinatal Psychology & Health, 21, 363–385.
- Eyer, D. (1996). Motherguilt. New York: Times Books.
- Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Crown.
- Feder, D. (2006, March). Feminists to women: Shut up and do as you’re told. Human Events, 62(9), 15.
- Franzblau, S. H. (1999). Historicizing attachment theory: Binding the ties that bind. Feminism & Psychology, 9, 22–31. doi:10.1177/0959353599009001003. CrossRef
- Friedan, B. (1981). Second stage. New York: Summit Books.
- Friedman, M. (2008). “Everything you need to know about your baby:” Feminism and attachment parenting. In J. Nathanson & L. C. Tuley (Eds.), Mother knows best: Talking back to the “experts” (pp. 135–141). Toronto: Demeter Press.
- Gerson, M.-J. (1980). The lure of motherhood. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 5, 207–218. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1980.tb00957.x. CrossRef
- Gerson, M.-J. (1984). Feminism and the wish for a child. Sex Roles, 11, 389–399. doi:10.1007/BF00287467. CrossRef
- Gordon, T. (1990). Feminist mothers. New York: New York University Press.
- Green, K. E., & Groves, M. M. (2008). Attachment parenting: An exploration of demographics and practices. Early Child Development and Care, 178, 513–525. doi:10.1080/03004430600851199. CrossRef
- Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. New Haven: Yale University Press.
- Houvouras, S., & Carter, J. S. (2008). The F word: College students’ definitions of a feminist. Sociological Forum, 23, 234–256. doi:10.1111/j.1573-7861.2008.00072.x. CrossRef
- Johnston, D. D., & Swanson, D. H. (2003). Invisible mothers: A content analysis of motherhood ideologies and myths in magazines. Sex Roles, 49, 21–33. doi:10.1023/A:1023905518500. CrossRef
- Jong, E. (2010, November 6). The madness of modern motherhood. The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704462704575590603553674296.html.
- Katz-Wise, S. L., Priess, H. A., & Hyde, J. S. (2010). Gender-role attitudes and behavior across the transition to parenthood. Developmental Psychology, 46, 18–28. doi:10.1037/a0017820. CrossRef
- Liss, M., Hoffner, C., & Crawford, M. (2000). What do feminists believe? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 279–284. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2000.tb00210.x. CrossRef
- Lopez, L. K. (2009). The radical act of ‘mommy blogging’: Redefining motherhood through the blogosphere. New Media & Society, 11, 729–747. doi:10.1177/1461444809105349. CrossRef
- Morgan, B. L. (1996). Putting the feminism into feminism scales: Introduction of a Liberal Feminist Attitude and Ideology Scale (LFAIS). Sex Roles, 34, 359–390. doi:10.1007/BF01547807. CrossRef
- O’Brien Hallstein, D. L. (2008). Silence and choice: The legacies of white second wave feminism in the new professoriate. Women’s Studies in Communication, 31, 143–150. doi:10.1080/07491409.2008.10162526. CrossRef
- O’Reilly, A. O. (Ed.). (2008). Feminist mothering. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Rich, A. (1976). Of woman born: Motherhood as experience and institution. New York: Norton.
- Ruddick, S. (1989). Maternal thinking: Toward a politics of peace. Boston: Beacon.
- Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2007). The F word: Is feminism incompatible with beauty and romance? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 125–136. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00346.x. CrossRef
- Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, J. E. (2007). The interpersonal power of feminism: Is feminism good for romantic relationships? Sex Roles, 57, 787–799. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9319-9. CrossRef
- Schon, R. A., & Silven, M. (2007). Natural parenting: Back to basics in infant care. Evolutionary Psychology, 5, 102–183.
- Sears, W., & Sears, M. (2003). The baby book. New York: Sears and Sears.
- Simons, M. A. (1984). Motherhood, feminism and identity. Women’s Studies International Forum, 7, 349–359. doi:10.1016/0277-5395(84)90034-7. CrossRef
- Snitow, A. (1992). Feminism and motherhood: An American reading. Feminist Review, 40, 32–51. doi:10.1057/fr.1992.4. CrossRef
- Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Thanyachareon, A. M. W. (2010). Mother work: A stay-at-home mom advocates breastfeeding. In A. M. White (Ed.), African Americans doing feminism: Putting theory into everyday practice (pp. 11–30). Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Tietjens Meyers, D. (2001). The rush to motherhood: Pronatalist discourse and women’s autonomy. Signs, 6, 735–773. doi:10.1086/495627. CrossRef
- Twenge, J. M., & Zucker, A. N. (1999). What is a feminist? Evaluations and stereotypes in closed- and open-ended responses. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23, 591–605. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00383.x. CrossRef
- Umansky, L. (1996). Motherhood reconceived: Feminism and the legacy of the sixties. New York: New York University Press.
- Yoder, J. D., Tobia, A., & Snell, A. F. (2011). When declaring “I am a feminist” matters: Labeling is linked to activism. Sex Roles, 64, 9–18. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9890-3. CrossRef
- Feminism and Attachment Parenting: Attitudes, Stereotypes, and Misperceptions
Volume 67, Issue 3-4 , pp 131-142
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Attachment parenting
- Social norms
- Social identity theory