The Efficacy of Single-Sex Education: Testing for Selection and Peer Quality Effects
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
To address selection and peer quality effects in tests of the efficacy of single-sex schools, the achievement of girls attending a public single-sex middle school in the Southwest United States (N = 121) was compared to that of (a) girls who applied but were not admitted to the same school (N = 229) and (b) girls who applied to and attended a coeducational magnet school (N = 134). Achievement scores were collected over 3 years for the ethnically diverse participants (41 African Americans, 27 Asian Americans, 163 European Americans, 251 Latinos, and two Native Americans). After controlling for selection and peer quality effects, there was no significant effect of the gender composition of schools on achievement. Implications for educational policy are discussed.
- Balkin, J. M. (2002). Is there a slippery slope from single-sex education to single-race education? The Journal of Blacks in Higher Education, 37, 126–127. CrossRef
- Blakemore, J. E. O., Berenbaum, S. A., & Liben, L. S. (2009). Gender development. New York: Psychology Press.
- Bracey, G. W. (2006). Separate but superior? A review of issues and data bearing on single-sex education. Tempe: Educational Policy Research Unit (EPRU).
- Campbell, P. B., & Wahl, E. (1998). What’s sex got to do with it? Simplistic questions, complex answers. In S. Morse (Ed.), Separated by sex: A critical look at single-sex education for girls (pp. 63–74). Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.
- Elliot, L. (2009). Pink brain, blue brain: How small differences grow into troublesome gaps- and what we can do about it. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
- Gurian, M., Henley, P., & Trueman, T. (2001). Boys and girls learn differently!: A guide for teachers and parents. New York: Jossey-Bass.
- Haag, P. (1998). Single-sex education in grades K-12: What does the research tell us? In S. Morse (Ed.), Separated by sex: A critical look at single-sex education for girls (pp. 13–38). Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.
- Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. The American Psychologist, 60, 581–592. CrossRef
- Kurdek, L. A., & Sinclair, R. J. (2000). Psychological, family and peer predictors of academic outcomes in first- through fifth-grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 449–457. CrossRef
- Lee, V. E. (1998). Is single-sex secondary schooling a solution to the problem of gender inequity? In S. Morse (Ed.), Separated by sex: A critical look at single-sex education for girls (pp. 41–53). Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.
- Lee, V. E., Marks, H. M., & Byrd, T. (1994). Sexism in single-sex and co-educational independent secondary school classrooms. Sociology of Education, 67, 92–120. CrossRef
- Marsh, H. W. (1989). Effects of attending single-sex and coeducational high-schools on achievement, attitudes, behavior, and sex differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 70–85. CrossRef
- Morse, S. (Ed.). (1998). Separated by sex: A critical look at single-sex education for girls. Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.
- Mael, F. (1998). Single-sex and coeducational schooling: Relationships to socioemotional and academic development. Review of Educational Research, 68, 101–129.
- Mael, F., Alonso, A., Gibson, D., Rogers, K., & Smith, M. (2005). Single-sex versus coeducational schooling: A systematic review. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education.
- Myers, R. (1990). Classical and modern regression with applications (2nd ed.). Boston: Duxbury Press.
- National Association for Single-Sex Public Education (2009). Single-sex schools/schools with single-sex classrooms: What’s the difference? Retrieved from http://www.singlesexschools.org/schools-schools.htm.
- Riordan, C. (1998). The future of single-sex schools. In S. Morse (Ed.), Separated by sex: A critical look at single-sex education for girls (pp. 63–74). Washington, DC: AAUW Educational Foundation.
- Riordan, C. (2002). What do we know about the effects of single-sex schools in the private sector? Implications for public schools. In A. Datnow & L. Hubbard (Eds.), Gender in policy and practice: Perspectives on single-sex and coeducational schooling (pp. 10–30). New York: Routledge Falmer.
- Rustad, N., & Woods, J. (2004). Statement on the legality of single-sex education. American Association of University Women: Washington, D.C. Retrieved from http://www.aauw.org/advocacy/issue_advocacy/actionpages/upload/singlesex_comments.pdf.
- Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1994). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York: Simon and Schuster.
- Salomone, R. (2006). Single-sex programs: Resolving the research conundrum. Teachers College Record, 108, 778–802. CrossRef
- Sax, L. (2005). Why gender matters. New York: Doubleday.
- Shapka, J. D., & Keating, D. P. (2003). Effects of a girls-only curriculum during adolescence: Performance, persistence, and engagement in mathematics and science. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 929–960. CrossRef
- Texas Education Agency (2010). Texas Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (TAKS) resources. Retrieved from http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index3.aspx?id=948&menu_id=793.
- U.S. Department of Education (2003). Identifying and implementing educational practices supported by rigorous evidence: A user friendly guide. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/evidence_based/evidence_based.asp.
- United States v. Virginia, 518 U.S. 515 (1996).
- The Efficacy of Single-Sex Education: Testing for Selection and Peer Quality Effects
Volume 65, Issue 9-10 , pp 693-703
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Single-sex education
- Academic achievement
- Peer quality
- Selection effects
- Industry Sectors