When Declaring “I am a Feminist” Matters: Labeling is Linked to Activism
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Being a feminist has been operationalized as a label (linked with activism), beliefs (associated with personal and interpersonal outcomes), and their combination. Using an internet survey completed by 220 American mid-western college women, we explored the unique and combined impact of feminist self-labeling with feminist beliefs on women’s well-being, egalitarianism, and activism. Self-labeling was most clearly defined as a binary declaration of being a feminist or not, which alone was related to increased feminist activism above and beyond the impact of feminist beliefs. Furthermore, self-labeling, unlike feminist beliefs, was not related to personal well-being or interpersonal egalitarianism. Our findings confirm the exclusive and singular importance of self-labeling for enhanced feminist action.
- Bargad, A., & Hyde, J. S. (1991). Women’s studies: A study of feminist identity development in women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 181–201. CrossRef
- Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Zucker, N. (2007). Feminism between the sheets: Sexual attitudes among feminists, nonfeminists, and egalitarians. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 157–163. CrossRef
- Botkin, D. R., Weeks, M. O., & Morris, J. E. (2000). Changing marriage role expectations: 1961–1996. Sex Roles, 42, 933–942. CrossRef
- Costanzo, E. S., & Ryff, C. D. (2009). Psychosocial adjustment among cancer survivors: Findings from a national survey of health and well-being. Health Psychology, 28, 147–156. CrossRef
- Cowan, G., Mestlin, M., & Masek, J. (1992). Predictors of feminist self-labeling. Sex Roles, 27, 321–330. CrossRef
- Deaux, K., Reid, A., Mizrahi, K., & Ethier, K. A. (1995). Parameters of social identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 280–291. CrossRef
- Downing, N., & Roush, K. (1985). From passive acceptance to active commitment: A model of feminist identity development for women. The Counseling Psychologist, 13, 695–709. CrossRef
- Duncan, L. E. (1999). Motivation for collective action: Group consciousness as a mediator of personality, life experiences, and women’s rights activism. Political Psychology, 20, 611–635. CrossRef
- Duncan, L. E. (2010). Women’s relationship to feminism: Effects of generation and feminist self-labeling. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 498–507. CrossRef
- Dunn, M. S. (1960). Marriage role expectations of adolescents. Marriage and Family Living, 22, 99–111. CrossRef
- Eisele, H., & Stake, J. (2008). The differential relationship of feminist attitudes and feminist identity to self-efficacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 233–244. CrossRef
- Fassinger, R. E. (1994). Development and testing of the attitudes toward Feminism and the Women’s Movement (FWM) scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 389–402. CrossRef
- Fischer, A. R., & Good, G. E. (1994). Gender, self, and others: Perceptions of the campus environment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 41, 343–355. CrossRef
- Fischer, A. R., & Holz, K. B. (2010). Testing a model of women’s personal sense of justice, control, well-being, and distress in the context of sexist discrimination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 297–310. CrossRef
- Fischer, A. R., Tokar, D. M., Mergl, M. M., Good, G. E., Hill, M. S., & Blum, S. A. (2000). Assessing women’s feminist identity development: Studies of convergent, discriminant, and structural validity. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 15–29. CrossRef
- Gilbert, L. A., & Rader, J. (2001). Current perspectives on women’s adult roles: Work, family, and life. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 156–169). New York: Wiley.
- Henley, N. M., Meng, K., O’Brien, D., McCarthy, W. J., & Sockloskie, R. J. (1998). Developing a scale to measure the diversity of feminist attitudes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 317–348. CrossRef
- Henley, N. M., Spalding, L. R., & Kosta, A. (2000). Development of the short form of the feminist perspectives scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 24, 254–256. CrossRef
- Hurt, M. M., Nelson, J. A., Turner, D. L., Haines, M. E., Ramsey, L. R., Erchull, M. J., et al. (2007). Feminism: What is it good for? Feminine norms and objectification as the link between feminist identity and clinically relevant outcomes. Sex Roles, 57, 355–363. CrossRef
- Liss, M., & Erchull, M. J. (2010). Everyone feels empowered: Understanding feminist self-labeling. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 85–96. CrossRef
- Liss, M., O’Connor, C., Morosky, E., & Crawford, M. (2001). What makes a feminist? Predictors and correlates of feminist social identity in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25, 124–133. CrossRef
- Liss, M., Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2004). Predictors and correlates of collective action. Sex Roles, 50, 771–779. CrossRef
- Moradi, B., & Subich, L. M. (2002). Feminist identity development measures: Comparing the psychometrics of three instruments. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 66–86. CrossRef
- Moradi, B., & Yoder, J. D. (in press). Current status and future directions in research on women’s experiences. In E. M. Altmaier & J. C. Hansen (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of counseling psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Moradi, B., Subich, L. M., & Phillips, J. (2002). Revisiting feminist identity development theory, research, and practice. The Counseling Psychologist, 30, 6–43. CrossRef
- Myaskovsky, L., & Wittig, M. A. (1997). Predictors of feminist social identity among college women. Sex Roles, 37, 861–883. CrossRef
- Nelson, J. A., Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., Hurt, M. M., Ramsey, L. R., Turner, D. L., et al. (2008). Identity in action: Predictors of feminist self identification and collective action. Sex Roles, 58, 721–728. CrossRef
- Pettigrew, T. F. (1991). Toward unity and bold theory: Popperian suggestions for two persistent problems of social psychology. In C. W. Stephan, W. G. Stephan, & T. F. Pettigrew (Eds.), The future of social psychology (pp. 13–27). New York: Springer-Verlag.
- Rickard, K. M. (1987). Feminist identity development: Scale development and initial validation studies. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Women in Psychology, Denver, CO.
- Rudman, L. A., & Fairchild, K. (2007). The F word: Is feminism incompatible with beauty and romance? Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 125–136. CrossRef
- Rudman, L. A., & Phelan, E. (2007). The interpersonal power of feminism: Is feminism good for romantic relationships? Sex Roles, 57, 787–799. CrossRef
- Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081. CrossRef
- Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727. CrossRef
- Schick, V. R., Zucker, A. N., & Bay-Cheng, L. Y. (2008). Safer, better sex through feminism: The role of feminist ideology in women’s sexual well-being. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32, 225–232. CrossRef
- Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1994). Identity salience and psychological centrality: Equivalent, overlapping, or complementary concepts? Social Psychology Quarterly, 57, 16–35. CrossRef
- Taylor, V., & Whittier, N. (1997). The new feminist movement. In L. Richardson, V. Taylor, & N. Wittier (Eds.), Feminist Frontiers IV (pp. 544–561). New York: McGraw Hill.
- Valenzuela, A. (1993). Liberal gender role attitudes and academic achievement among Mexican-origin adolescents in two Houston inner-city Catholic schools. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 15, 310–323. CrossRef
- Williams, R., & Wittig, M. A. (1997). “I’m not a feminist, but...”: Factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37, 885–904. CrossRef
- Worell, J., & Remer, P. (2003). Feminist perspectives in therapy: Empowering diverse women (2nd ed.). Hoboken: Wiley.
- Yoder, J. D., Fischer, A. R., Kahn, A. S., & Groden, J. (2007a). Changes in students’ explanations for gender differences after taking a Psychology of Women class: More constructionist and less essentialist. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 415–425. CrossRef
- Yoder, J. D., Perry, R. L., & Saal, E. I. (2007b). What good is a feminist identity?: Women’s feminist identification and role expectations for intimate and sexual relationships. Sex Roles, 57, 365–372. CrossRef
- Yoder, J. D., Tobias, A., & Snell, A. (2009, August). The personal and political sides of undergraduate women’s feminist identification. Poster presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto.
- Zucker, A. N. (2004). Disavowing social identities: What it means when women say, “I’m not a feminist, but...”. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 423–435. CrossRef
- When Declaring “I am a Feminist” Matters: Labeling is Linked to Activism
Volume 64, Issue 1-2 , pp 9-18
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Social identity
- Self concept
- Sex role attitudes