Sex Roles

, Volume 62, Issue 7, pp 481–493

When Female Applicants Meet Sexist Interviewers: The Costs of Being a Target of Benevolent Sexism

Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11199-009-9685-6

Cite this article as:
Good, J.J. & Rudman, L.A. Sex Roles (2010) 62: 481. doi:10.1007/s11199-009-9685-6

Abstract

American undergraduate participants (N = 205) read an interview transcript and then evaluated male interviewers and a female job applicant to investigate perceptions of women who receive benevolent or hostile sexism (relative to non-sexist controls). As predicted, positive evaluations of the male interviewer in the benevolent and hostile sexist conditions negatively predicted participants’ hiring decisions—an effect that was fully mediated by low ratings of applicant competence. In accord with ambivalent sexism theory’s claim that women who challenge male dominance are not eligible for protective paternalism, participants’ hostile sexism scores predicted lower ratings of applicant competence and hireability, but only when the interviewer was a benevolent sexist. Implications for workplace discrimination are discussed.

Keywords

Ambivalent sexismGender attitudesSex discriminationEmployment discrimination

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyRutgers UniversityPiscatawayUSA