When Do Men and Women Make Attributions to Gender Discrimination? The Role of Discrimination Source
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Two experiments examined the effects of discrimination source on men’s and women’s willingness to make attributions to a sexist experimenter or sexist rules. Students (161 male; 171 females) at a US university were exposed to a discriminatory person, discriminatory rule, or no discrimination. “Experiment 1” demonstrated individuals were less likely to make attributions to a sexist person than an unfair rule, and women were especially reluctant to indicate a person was responsible for their discrimination even when a person was the source. “Experiment 2” showed participants were less likely to indicate an experimenter, and even a rule, was sexist when there was a cost to the perpetrator (i.e., advisor would be notified of the perpetrator’s actions) for making such attributions.
- Chodorow, N. J. (1978). The reproduction of mother: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
- Chodorow, N. J. (1989). Feminism and psychoanalytic theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Crocker, J., & Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96, 608–630. CrossRef
- Crocker, J., Voelkl, K., Testa, M., & Major, B. (1991). Social stigma: The affective consequences of attributional ambiguity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 218–228. CrossRef
- Crosby, F. (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371–386. CrossRef
- Crosby, F., Clayton, S., Alksnis, O., & Hemker, K. (1986). Cognitive biases in the perception of discrimination: the importance of format. Sex Roles, 14, 637–646. CrossRef
- DeSouza, E. R., Pryor, J. B., & Hutz, C. S. (1998). Reactions to sexual harassment charges between North Americans and Brazilians. Sex Roles, 39, 913–928. CrossRef
- Dodd, E. H., Giuliano, T. A., Boutell, J. M., & Moran, B. E. (2001). Respected or rejected: Perceptions of women who confront sexist remarks. Sex Roles, 45, 567–577. CrossRef
- Fitzgerald, L., & Ormerod, A. J. (1991). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The influence of gender and context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 281–294. CrossRef
- Fitzgerald, L., Swan, S., & Fischer, K. (1995). Why didn’t she report him? The psychological and legal implications of women’s responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 117–138. CrossRef
- Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Gilligan, C., Lyons, N. P., & Hanmer, T. J. (1990). Making connections: The relational worlds of adolescent girls at Emma Willard School. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 763–775. CrossRef
- Jourard, S. (1976). Some lethal aspects of the male sex role. In D. David & R. Brannon (Eds.), The forty-nine percent majority: The male sex role. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
- Kaiser, C., & Miller, C. (2001). Stop complaining!: The social costs of making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 254–263. CrossRef
- Kritzier, H. M., Vidmar, N., & Bogart, W. A. (1991). To confront or not to confront: Measuring claiming rates in discrimination grievances. Law & Society Review, 25, 877–887.
- Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & McCoy, S. K. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of attributions to discrimination: Theoretical and empirical advances. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 251–330). San Diego, CA: Academic.
- Major, B., Quinton, W. J., & Schmader, T. (2003). Attributions to discrimination and self-esteem: Impact of group identification and situational ambiguity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 220–231. CrossRef
- Matsui, T., Kakuyama, T., Onglatco, M., & Ogutu, M. (1995). Women’s perceptions of social-sexual behavior: A cross-cultural replication. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 46, 203–215. CrossRef
- Olson, J. E., Frieze, I. H., Wall, S., Zdaniuk, B., Ferligoj, A., et al. (2007). Beliefs in equality for women and men as related to economic factors in Central and Eastern Europe and the United States. Sex Roles, 56, 297–308. CrossRef
- Pinel, E. C. (1999). Stigma-consciousness: The psychological legacy of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 114–128. CrossRef
- Pryor, J. B., & Day, J. D. (1988). Interpretations of sexual harassment: An attributional analysis. Sex Roles, 18, 405–417. CrossRef
- Sechrist, G. B., Swim, J. K., & Mark, M. M. (2003). Mood as information in making attributions to discrimination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 524–531. CrossRef
- Sechrist, G. B., Swim, J. K., & Stangor, C. (2004). When do the stigmatized make attributions to discrimination occurring to the self and others? The roles of self-presentation and need for control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 111–122. CrossRef
- Shaffer, M. A., Joplin, J. R. W., Bell, M. P., Lau, T., & Oguz, C. (2000). Gender discrimination and job-related outcomes: A cross-cultural comparison of working women in the United States and China. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 395–427. CrossRef
- Shelton, J. N., & Stewart, R. E. (2004). Confronting perpetrators of prejudice: The inhibitory effects of social costs. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 215–223. CrossRef
- Stangor, C., Sechrist, G. B., & Swim, J. K. (1999). Sensitivity to sexism and perceptions of reports about sexist events. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 58, 251–256. CrossRef
- Stangor, C., Swim, J. K., Van Allen, K. L., & Sechrist, G. B. (2002). Reporting discrimination in public and private contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 69–74. CrossRef
- Stangor, C., Swim, J. K., Sechrist, G. B., DeCoster, J., Van Allen, K. L., & Ottenbreit, A. (2003). Ask, answer, and announce: Three stages in perceiving and responding to discrimination. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 277–311). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
- Swim, J. K., & Stangor, C. (1998). Prejudice: The target’s perspective. Santa Barbara, CA: Academic.
- Swim, J. K., & Hyers, L. L. (1999). Excuse me—What did you just say?!: Women’s public and private responses to sexist remarks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 68–88. CrossRef
- Swim, J. K., Aikin, K., Hall, W., & Hunter, B. A. (1995). Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 199–214. CrossRef
- Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., & Ferguson, M. J. (2001). Everyday sexism: evidence for its incidence, nature, and psychological impact from three daily diary studies. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 31–53. CrossRef
- Swim, J. K., Scott, E. D., Sechrist, G. B., Campbell, B., & Stangor, C. (2003). The role of intent and harm in judgments of prejudice and discrimination. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 944–959. CrossRef
- Swim, J. K., Becker, J., Lee, E., & Pruitt, E. R. (2009). Sexism reloaded: Worldwide evidence for its endorsement, expression and emergence in multiple contexts. In H. Landrine & N. Russo (Eds.), Bringing diversity to feminist psychology. New York, NY: Springer.
- Taylor, D. M., Wright, S. C., & Porter, L. E. (1994). Dimensions of perceived discrimination: The personal/group discrimination discrepancy. In M. P. Zanna & J. M. Olson (Eds.), The psychology of prejudice: The Ontario symposium, vol. 7 (pp. 233–255). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- When Do Men and Women Make Attributions to Gender Discrimination? The Role of Discrimination Source
Volume 61, Issue 9-10 , pp 607-620
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors