Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin
Blood, R., & Wolfe, D. (1960). Husbands and wives. New York: Free Press.
Blumberg, R. L., & Coleman, M. T. (1989). A theoretical look at the gender balance of power in the American couple. Journal of Family Issues
Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1983). American couples: Money, work, and sex. New York: William Morrow.
Bond, M. H., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Cross-cultural social and organizational psychology. Annual Review of Psychology
Brayfield, A. A. (1992). Employment resources and housework in Canada. Journal of Marriage and the Family
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review
Chen, Z. X. (1999). An investigation of university students’ love values. Psychology, 7, 78–53 (in Chinese). (陈志霞 (1999). 大学生恋爱价值观的调查分析.心理学, 7, 78–53).
Coleman, D. H., & Straus, M. A. (1990). Marital power, conflict and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples. In M. Straus, & R. Gelles (Eds.), Physical violence in American families (pp. 287–304). Somerset, NJ: Transaction.
Coltrane, S. (1996). Family man: Fatherhood, housework and gender equity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cousineau, M.-M., & Rondeau, G. (2004). Toward a transnational and cross-culture analysis of family violence: issues and recommendations. Transnational and Cross-culture Research, 10, 935–949.
Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: quasi-experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review
Eagly, A. H., & Wood, W. (1999). The origins of sex differences in human behavior: evolved dispositions versus social roles. American Psychologist
Eastwick, P. W., Eagly, A. H., Glick, P., Johannesen-Schmidt, M., Fiske, S. T., Blum, A., et al. (2006). Is traditional gender ideology associated with sex-typed mate preferences? A test in nine nations. Sex Roles
Feingold, A. (1990). Gender differences in effects of physical attractiveness on romantic attraction: a comparison across five research paradigms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Feingold, A. (1992). Gender differences in mate selection preferences: a test of the parental investment model. Psychological Bulletin
Ferree, M. (1990). Beyond separate spheres: feminism and family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family
Fiske, S. T. (2004). Social beings: A core motives approach to social psychology. Hoboken: Wiley.
Fisman, R., Iyengar, S. S., Kamenica, E., & Simonson, I. (2006). Gender differences in mate selection: evidence from speed dating experience. The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Gillespie, D. (1971). Who has the power? The marital struggle. Journal of Marriage and the Family
Glick, P., Diebold, J., Bailey-Werner, B., & Zhu, L. (1997). The two faces of Adam: ambivalent sexism and polarized attitudes toward women. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1999). Differentiating hostile and benevolent beliefs about men. Psychology of Women Quarterly
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications of gender inequality. American Psychologist
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., et al. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Glick, P., Lameiras, M., Fiske, S. T., Eckes, T., Masser, B., Volpato, C., et al. (2004). Bad but bold: ambivalent attitudes toward men predict gender inequality in 16 nations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Goldscheider, F. K., & Waite, L. J. (1991). New families, no families? The transformation of the American home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gondolf, E. (2004). International research on family violence. Violence Against Women
Greenstein, T. N. (1996). Gender ideology and perception of the fairness of the division of household labor: effects on marital quality. Social Forces
Gutierres, S. E., Kenrick, D. T., & Partch, J. J. (1999). Beauty, dominance, and the mating game: contrast effects in self-assessment reflect gender differences in mate selection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Heine, S. J., & Buchtel, E. E. (2009). Personality: the universal and the culturally specific. Annual Review of Psychology
Howard, J. A., Blumstein, P., & Schwartz, P. (1987). Social or evolutionary theories? Some observations on preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Graziano, W. G., & West, S. G. (1995). Dominance, prosocial orientation, and female preferences: do nice guys really finish last? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Kamo, Y. (1988). Determinants of household division of labor: resources, power, and ideology. Journal of Family Issues
Kenrick, D. T., & Trost, M. R. (1989). A reproductive exchange model of heterosexual relationships: Putting proximate economics in ultimate perspective. In C. Hendrick (Ed.), Close relationships: Review of personality and social psychology, vol. 10 (pp. 92–118). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Kim, J.-Y., & Emery, C. (2003). Marital power, conflict, norm consensus, and marital violence in a nationally representative sample of Korean couples. Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Kinnier, R. T., Katz, E. C., & Berry, M. A. (1991). Successful resolutions to the career-versus-family conflict. Journal of Counseling and Development, 69, 439–444.
Kulik, L. (1999). Marital power relations, resources and gender role ideology: a multivariate model for assessing effects. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 30, 189–207.
Lueptow, L. B., Guss, M. B., & Hyden, C. (1989). Sex role ideology, marital status, and happiness. Journal of Family Issues
Ma, H. Q. (1997). The reality and countermeasures of Chinese women’s obtaining employment. Human Resource Development of China, 6, 25–28 (马焕琴(1997).我国妇女就业现状与对策.中国人力资源开发, 6, 25–28 ).
McDonald, G. W. (1980). Family power: The assessment of a decade of theory and research, 1970–1979. Journal of Marriage and the Family
Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2008). The social psychology of gender: How power and intimacy shape gender relations. New York: Guilford.
Sartin, R. M., Hansen, D. J., & Huss, M. T. (2006). Domestic violence treatment response and recidivism: a review and implications for the study of family violence. Aggression and Violent Behavior
Safilios-Rothschild, C. (1967). A comparison of power structure and marital satisfaction in urban Greek and French families. Journal of Marriage and the Family
Scanzoni, J., & Szinovacz, M. (1980). Family decision-making: A developmental sex role model. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Sprecher, S., Sullivan, Q., & Hatfield, E. (1994). Mate selection preferences: gender differences examined in a national sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Sprecher, S., & Toro-Morn, M. (2002). A study of men and women from different sides of earth to determine if men are from Mars and women are from Venus in their beliefs about love and romantic relationships. Sex Roles
Warner, R. L., Lee, G. R., & Lee, J. (1986). Social organization, spousal resources, and marital power: a cross-culture study. Journal of Marriage and the Family
Whyte, M. K. (1990). Dating, mating, and marriage. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
Wilkie, J. R., Ferree, M. M., & Ratcliff, K. S. (1998). Gender and fairness: marital satisfaction in two-earner couples. Journal of Marriage and the Family
Xu, A. Q. (2000). Mate selection criteria: 50 years flux and its cause. Sociology Research, 6, 18–30 (in Chinese). (徐安琪 (2000).择偶标准:五十年变迁及其原因分析.社会学研究, 6, 11–30).
Yue, G. A., Chen, H., & Zhang, Y. Y. (2005). Verification of evolutionary hypothesis on human mate selection mechanism in cross-culture context. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37, 561–568 (in Chinese). (乐国安,陈浩,张彦彦 (2005),.进化心理学择偶心理机制假设的跨文化检验———以天津、Boston两地征婚启事的内容分析为例.心理学报, 37, 561–568).