Sex Roles

, Volume 59, Issue 9, pp 713–725

Effects of Ingroup Bias and Gender Role Violations on Acquaintance Rape Attributions

  • Lisa A. Harrison
  • Dawn M. Howerton
  • Ashley M. Secarea
  • Chau Q. Nguyen
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s11199-008-9472-9

Cite this article as:
Harrison, L.A., Howerton, D.M., Secarea, A.M. et al. Sex Roles (2008) 59: 713. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9472-9

Abstract

Two studies of ethnically diverse US college students from northern California examined whether ingroup bias and gender norm violations influence acquaintance rape attributions (Study 1, N = 118; Study 2, N = 140). Participants read vignettes depicting acquaintance rape and completed questionnaires. Victims were part of participants’ ingroup or outgroup. Study 1 manipulated the victim’s sexual history (chaste or promiscuous). Study 2 manipulated the victim’s alcohol use (sober or intoxicated). Ingroup victims were perceived more positively than outgroup victims if the victims were promiscuous or intoxicated. More guilt was attributed to rapists of ingroup victims than outgroup victims if the victims were promiscuous or intoxicated. Findings are examined in relation to ingroup bias and gender norm violations.

Keywords

Acquaintance rapeGender role violationsIngroup bias

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lisa A. Harrison
    • 1
  • Dawn M. Howerton
    • 2
  • Ashley M. Secarea
    • 1
  • Chau Q. Nguyen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCalifornia State UniversitySacramentoUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of TenneseeKnoxvilleUSA