Abstract
The effects of gender stereotype activation by priming on performance in a spatial task were investigated among a mixed adult sample (including students) of 161 men and women (mean age = 31.90) from Austria (Europe). They were assigned to one of four experimental groups according to gender and stereotype activation condition. After a male or female gender stereotype activating task, participants worked on a test assessing mental rotation (three-dimensional cube test, Gittler 1990). A significant main effect of priming on the performance in the mental rotation task emerged. Cohen’s d showed a pronounced gender difference emerging only in the female priming condition (d = .59), whereas it disappeared in the male priming condition (d = .01).
References
Baenninger, M., & Newcombe, N. (1989). The role of experience in spatial test performance: a meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 20, 327–344.
Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1996). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54, 462–476.
Best, D. L. (2001). Gender concepts: convergence in cross-cultural research and methodologies. Cross-cultural research. The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 35, 23–43.
Birenbaum, M., Kelley, A. E., & Levi-Keren, M. (1994). Stimulus features and sex differences in mental rotation test performance. Intelligence, 19, 51–64.
Bornholt, L. J., Goodnow, J. J., & Cooney, G. H. (1994). Influences of gender stereotypes on adolescents’ perceptions of their own achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 31, 675–692.
Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.
Deaux, K., & LaFrance, M. (1998). Gender. In D. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology. New York: Random House.
Deaux, K., & Major, B. (1987). Putting gender into context: an interactive model of gender-related behavior. Psychological Review, 94, 369–389.
Désert, M., & Leyens, J.-P. (2006). Social comparison across cultures I: Gender stereotypes in high and low power distance cultures. In S. Guimond (Ed.), Social comparison and social psychology: Understanding cognition, intergroup relations and culture (pp. 303–317). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dijksterhuis, A., Aarts, H., Bargh, J. A., & Van Knippenberg, A. (2000). On the relation between associative strength and automatic behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 531–544.
Dijksterhuis, A., & Bargh, J. A. (2001). The perception-behavior expressway: automatic effects of social perception on social behavior. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–40). San Diego. CA.: Academic Press.
Dijksterhuis, A., & van Knippenberg, A. (1998). The relation between perception and behavior, or how to win a game of trivial pursuit. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 865–877.
Dittmann, J., & Scheuer, A. (2007). Berufstätigkeit von Müttern bleibt kontrovers [Occupation of mothers remains controversial]. Informationsdienst Soziale Indikatoren, 38, 1–5.
Durik, A. M., Hyde, J. S., Marks, A. C., Roy, A. L., Anaya, D., & Schultz, G. (2006). Ethnicity and gender stereotypes of emotion. Sex Roles, 54, 429–445.
Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behaviour: A social role interpretation. Hillsdale/NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Eagly, A. H., Wood, W., & Diekman, A. B. (2000). Social role theory of sex differences and similarities: a current appraisal. In T. Eckes & H. M. Trautner (Eds.), The developmental social psychology of gender (pp. 123–174). Mahwah, NJ.: Erlbaum.
Eriksson, K., & Lindholm, T. (2007). Making gender matter: the role of gender-based expectancies and gender identification on women’s and men’s math performance in Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 48, 329–338.
European Commission (2006). She figures 2006, women and science, statistics and indicators: European Communities.
European Commission (2007). Database—social and economic domain: decision-making in the largest publicly quoted companies.
Fay, E. (1996). Tests unter der Lupe. Aktuelle Leistungstests-kritisch betrachtet [A closer examination of current performance tests from a critical point of view] (Band 1. Testrezension 3DW (S. 21–27). Heidelberg: Asanger.
Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing. American Psychologist, 43, 95–103.
Feingold, A. (1994). Gender differences in personality: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 429–456.
Flaherty, M. (2005). Gender differences in mental rotation ability in three cultures: Ireland, Ecuador and Japan. Psychologia, 48, 31–38.
Frieze, I. H., Ferligoj, A., Kogovsek, T., Rener, T., Horvat, J., & Sarlija, N. (2003). Gender-role attitudes in university students in the United States, Slovenia and Croatia. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 256–261.
Furnham, A., Fong, G., & Martin, F. (1999). Sex and cross-cultural differences in the estimated multifaceted intelligence quotient score for self, parents and siblings. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 1025–1034.
Geary, D. C., & DeSoto, M. C. (2001). Sex differences in spatial abilities among adults from the United States and China: implications for evolutionary theory. Evolution and Cognition, 7, 172–177.
Gibbons, L. J., Stiles, D. A., & Shkodriani, G. M. (1991). Adolescents’ attitudes toward family and gender roles: an international comparison. Sex Roles, 25, 625–643.
Gittler, G. (1990). Dreidimensionaler Würfeltest (3DW) [Three-dimensional cube test]. Beltz: Weinheim, Germany.
Guillot, A., Champely, S., Batier, C., Thiriet, P., & Collet, C. (2007). Relationship between spatial abilities, mental rotation and functional anatomy learning. Advances in Health and Sciences Education, 12, 1573–1677.
Guimond, S., Branscombe, N. R., Brunot, S., Buunk, A. P., Chatard, A., Desert, M., et al. (2007). Culture, gender, and the self: variations and impact of social comparison processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1118–1134.
Halpern, D. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hamilton, C. J. (1995). Beyond sex differences in visuo-spatial processing. The impact of gender trait possession. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 1–20.
Harris, A. C. (1994). Ethnicity as a determinant of sex role identity: a replication study of item selection for the Bem Sex Role Inventory. Sex Roles, 31, 241–273.
Hoffman, C., & Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: perception or rationalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197–208.
Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarities hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.
Kail, R., Carter, P., & Pellegrino, J. (1979). The locus of sex differences in spatial ability. Perception and Psychophysics, 26, 182–186.
Kaufman, J. C. (2006). Self-reported differences in creativity by ethnicity and gender. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 1065–1082.
Kimura, D. (1992). Sex differences in the brain. Scientific American, 267, 119–125.
Lawton, C. A. (1994). Gender differences in way-finding strategies: relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles, 30, 765–779.
Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterisation of gender differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.
Luehring, J., & Altman, J. D. (2000). Factors contributing to sex differences in the mental rotation task. Psi Chi, 5, 39–35.
Masters, M. S. (1998). The gender difference on the mental rotations test is not due to performance factors. Memory and Cognition, 26, 444–448.
McGlone, M. S., & Aronson, J. (2006). Stereotype threat, identity salience, and spatial reasoning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 27, 486–493.
Newcombe, N., & Bandura, M. M. (1983). Effect of age at puberty on spatial ability in girls: a question of mechanism. Developmental Psychology, 19, 215–224.
Olson, J. E., Frieze, I. H., Wall, S., Zdaniuk, B., Ferligoj, A., Kogovsek, T., et al. (2007). Beliefs in equality for women and men as related to economic factors in Central and Eastern Europe and the United States. Sex Roles, 56, 297–308.
Oosthuizen, S. (1991). Sex-related differences in spatial ability in a group of South African students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 73, 51–54.
Peters, M., Manning, J. T., & Reimers, S. (2007). The effects of sex, sexual orientation, and digit ratio (2D:4D) on mental rotation performance. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 251–260.
Petrusic, W. M., Varro, L., & Jamieson, D. G. (1978). Mental rotation validation of two spatial ability tests. Psychological Research, 40, 139–148.
Rammstedt, B., & Rammsayer, T. H. (2000). Sex differences in self-estimates of different aspects of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 29, 869–880.
Rasanen, L. (1991). Girls and the learning of physical concepts. Finnish Journal of Education, 22, 185–194.
Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen: Nielsen & Lydiche.
Resnick, S. M. (1993). Sex differences in mental rotations: an effect of time limits. Brain and Cognition, 21, 71–79.
Sanders, B., & Soares, M. P. (1986). Sexual maturation and spatial ability in college students. Developmental Psychology, 22, 199–203.
Scali, M., Brownlow, S., & Hicks, J. (2000). Gender differences in spatial task performance as a function of speed or accuracy orientation. Sex Roles, 43, 359–376.
Sharps, M. J., Price, J. L., & Williams, J. K. (1994). Spatial cognition and gender. Instructional and stimulus influence on mental image rotation performance. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 413–425.
Shih, M., Ambady, N., Richeson, J. A., Fujita, K., & Gray, H. M. (2002). Stereotype performance boosts: the impact of self-relevance and the manner of stereotype activation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 638–647.
Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80–83.
Signorella, M. L., & Jamison, W. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 207–228.
Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4–28.
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: how stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613–629.
Vandenberg, S. G. (1971). Mental rotation test. University of Colorado: Boulder.
Voyer, D., Rodgers, M. A., & McCormick, P. A. (2004). Timing conditions and the magnitude of gender differences on the mental rotation task. Memory and Cognition, 23, 72–82.
Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: a meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.
Weiss, E. M., Kemmler, G., Deisenhammer, E. A., Fleischhacker, W. W., & Delazer, M. (2003). Sex differences in cognitive functions. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 863–875.
Wheeler, S. C., Jarvis, W. B. G., & Petty, R. E. (2001). Think unto others: the self-destructive impact of negative stereotypes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 173–180.
Wheeler, S. C., & Petty, R. E. (2001). The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: a review of possible mechanisms. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 797–826.
Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multinational study. Newbury Park: Sage.
Windischberger, C., Lamm, C., Bauer, H., & Moser, E. (2003). Human motor cortex activity during mental rotation. NeuroImage, 20, 225–232.
Acknowledgement
We would like to thank Melanie Fiegl, Michaela Kacvincka, Sandra Peyerl, Nicole Pritz and Sandra Raffetseder for their help with the data collection and two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ortner, T.M., Sieverding, M. Where are the Gender Differences? Male Priming Boosts Spatial Skills in Women. Sex Roles 59, 274–281 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9448-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9448-9