“It is not my intention to be a killjoy…”: Objecting to a Licence Application—The Complainers
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper explores the constructed nature of legal complaints through the adoption of a socio-linguistic model with an emphasis upon pragmatics and elements of conversation analysis. When making a legal complaint, we posit that there is a conflict between effective communication and the uptake of politeness strategies. Furthermore, how complaints are ‘worked up’ in situ is a product of the arena in which such complaints are made. Through a textual analysis of the methods of complaining adopted by those who make representations to the licensing authority, for the purposes of objecting to a licence application, we show the tension between making oneself clear and being polite, and how complaints in different settings take different forms. We conclude by exploring the implications of our findings for legal processes—is it reasonable, for instance, to talk of ‘consistency’ in testimony if each complaint is worked up in situ—and for pragmatic theory more generally, i.e the applicability of Brown and Levinson’s politeness model for legal processes.
- Boxer, D. 1993. Social distance and speech behaviour: The case of indirect complaints. Journal of Pragmatics 19: 103–125. CrossRef
- Brown, P., and S.C. Levinson. (1978/1987) Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: CUP. All page references refer to the 1987 edition.
- Drew, P., and T. Walker. 2009. Going too far: Complaining, escalating and disaffiliation. Journal of Pragmatics 41(12): 2400–2414. CrossRef
- Edwards, D. 2005. Moaning, whinging and laughing: The subjective side of complaints. Discourse Studies 7(1): 5–29. CrossRef
- Emerson, R.M., and S.L. Messinger. 1977. The micro-politics of trouble. Social Problems 25(2): 121–134. CrossRef
- Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.
- Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction ritual. New York: Anchor Books.
- Grice, H.P. 1975. Login and conversation. In Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech arts, ed. P. Cole, and J.L. Morgan. New York: Academic Press.
- Handford, M., and A. Koester. 2010. “It’s not rocket science”: Metaphors and idioms in conflictual business meetings. Text and Talk 30(1): 27–51. CrossRef
- Holmes, J. 1995. Women, men and politeness. London: Longman.
- House, J., and G. Kasper. 1981. Politeness markers in English and German. In Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech, ed. F. Coulmas. The Hague: Mouton.
- Jefferson, G. 1988. On the sequential organisation of troubles talk in ordinary conversation. Social Problems 35(4): 418–441. CrossRef
- Laforest, M. 2002. Scenes of family life: Complaining in everyday conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1595–1620. CrossRef
- Lorenzo-Dus, N. 2008. Real disorder in the court: An investigation of conflict talk in US television courtroom shows. Media, Culture & Society 30(1): 81–107. CrossRef
- Muntigl, P., and W. Turnbull. 1998. Conversational structure and facework in arguing. Journal of Pragmatics 29: 225–256. CrossRef
- O’Donnell, K. 1990. Difference and domination: How labor and management talk conflict. In Conflict talk: Sociolinguistic investigations of arguments in conversation, ed. A.D. Grimshaw. Cambridge: CUP.
- Pomerantz, A. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Structures of social action, ed. J.M. Atkinson, and J. Heritage. CUP: Cambridge.
- Pomerantz, A. 1986. Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies 9: 219–229. CrossRef
- Potter, J. 1996. Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
- Schegloff, E., G. Jefferson, and H. Sacks. 1977. Preference for self-correction in the organisation of repair in conversation. Language 53: 361–382.
- Scheppele, K.L. 1994. Practices of truth finding in a court of law: The case of revised stories. In Constructing the social, ed. T. Sarbin, and J. Kitsuse. London: Sage.
- Spencer, J.R. (ed.). 1989. Jackson’s machinery of justice, 8th ed. Cambridge: CUP.
- Wolfson, N. 1988. The bulge: A theory of speech behaviour and social distance. In Second language discourse: A textbook of current research, ed. J. Fine. Norwood: Ablex.
- Yaeger-Dror, M. 2002. Introduction. Journal of Pragmatics 34(10): 1333–1343. CrossRef
- “It is not my intention to be a killjoy…”: Objecting to a Licence Application—The Complainers
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique
Volume 25, Issue 3 , pp 369-392
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors