Skip to main content
Log in

Growth in the number of references in engineering journal papers during the 1972–2013 period

Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The number of references per paper, perhaps the best single index of a journal’s scholarliness, has been studied in different disciplines and periods. In this paper we present a four decade study of eight engineering journals. A data set of over 70,000 references was generated after automatic data gathering and manual inspection for errors. Results show a significant increase in the number of references per paper, the average rises from 8 in 1972 to 25 in 2013. This growth presents an acceleration around the year 2000, consistent with a much easier access to search engines and documents produced by the generalization of the Internet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

References

  • Albarrán, P., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2011). References made and citations received by scientific articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(1):40–49. doi:10.1002/asi.21448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. (1979). How to write and publish a scientific paper. Philadelphia, PA: ISI Press, http://books.google.es/books?id=5fhpAAAAMAAJ.

  • Krampen, G. (2010). Acceleration of citing behavior after the millennium? Exemplary bibliometric reference analyses for psychology journals. Scientometrics 83(2):507–513. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0093-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krampen, G., Becker, R., Wahner, U., & Montada, L. (2007). On the validity of citation counting in science evaluation: Content analyses of references and citations in psychological publications. Scientometrics 71(2):191–202. doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1659-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurikkala, J., Juhola, M., Kentala, E., Lavrac, N., Miksch, S., & Kavsek, B. (2000). Informal identification of outliers in medical data. Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Intelligent Data Analysis in Medicine and Pharmacology, Citeseer (pp. 20–24).

  • Lin, W. Y., & Huang, M. H. (2012). The relationship between co-authorship, currency of references and author self-citations. Scientometrics 90(2):343–360. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0523-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peritz, B., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2002). The sources used by bibliometrics–scientometrics as reflected in references. Scientometrics 54(2):269–284. doi:10.1023/A:1016018013096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, O., Glanzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics 60(3):421–432. doi:10.1023/B:SCIE.0000034384.35498.7d.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, E., & Moravscik, M. (1979). Citation patterns in little science and big science. Scientometrics 1(5–6):463–474. doi:10.1007/BF02016662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Solla Price, D. J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. HortScience 149(3683):510–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Solla Price, D. J. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology, and nonscience. In C. E. Nelson, D. K. Pollock (Eds.), Communication among scientists and engineers (pp. 3–22). Lexington: Heath Lexington Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstock, M. (1971). Citation indexes (Vol. 5). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (1994). Has price’s dream come true: Is scientometrics a hard science? Scientometrics 31(2):193–222. doi:10.1007/BF02018560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xhignesse, L. V., & Osgood, C. E. (1967). Bibliographical citation characteristics of the psychological journal network in 1950 and in 1960. American Psychologist 22:778–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yitzhaki, M., & Ben-Tamar, D. (1991). Number of references in biochemistry and other fields; a case study of the journal of biological chemistry throughout 1910–1985. Scientometrics 21(1):3–22. doi:10.1007/BF02019179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joaquín Sevilla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ucar, I., López-Fernandino, F., Rodriguez-Ulibarri, P. et al. Growth in the number of references in engineering journal papers during the 1972–2013 period. Scientometrics 98, 1855–1864 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1113-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1113-6

Keywords

Navigation