, Volume 90, Issue 2, pp 331–342

The perceived impact of publications on Neglected Tropical Zoonoses as measured by their impact factor

  • Dieter Vanderelst
  • Sara Speybroeck
  • Niko Speybroeck

DOI: 10.1007/s11192-011-0488-5

Cite this article as:
Vanderelst, D., Speybroeck, S. & Speybroeck, N. Scientometrics (2012) 90: 331. doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0488-5


We investigated whether papers on Neglected Tropical Zoonoses are published in journals with lower impact factors than research on diseases with a similar global health burden. We found that, despite being cited equally often, the papers on Neglected Tropical Zoonoses were published in journals with lower impact factors. The scopes of these journals are mainly restricted to Tropical medicine. A clustering analysis revealed that The Lancet, a high impact general medical journal, does pay attention to Neglected Tropical Zoonoses. We discuss our findings in the context of the ongoing discussion about the publishing policies of medical journals. Moreover, our findings stress the importance of recent suggestions that impact factors should not be used for assigning public funding to research (programs) on Neglected Tropical Zoonoses.


Neglected Tropical ZoonosesNeglected Tropical DiseasesDALYBurden of disease

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dieter Vanderelst
    • 1
  • Sara Speybroeck
    • 2
  • Niko Speybroeck
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Applied EconomicsUniversity AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  2. 2.Instituut voor Onderwijskunde & Informatie WetenschappenUniversity AntwerpAntwerpBelgium
  3. 3.Faculté de Santé PubliqueUniversité Catholique de LouvainLouvainBelgium