Scientometrics of big science: a case study of research in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Large-scale scientific projects have become a major impetus of scientific advances. But few studies have specifically analyzed how those projects bolster scientific research. We address this question from a scientometrics perspective. By analyzing the bibliographic records of papers relevant to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS), we found that the SDSS helped scientists from many countries further develop their own research; investigators initially formed large research groups to tackle key problems, while later papers involved fewer authors; and the number of research topics increased but the diversity of topics remains stable. Furthermore, the entropy analysis method has proven valuable in terms of analyzing patterns of research topics at a macroscopic level.
- Abt, H. A. (1981). Some trends in American astronomical publications. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 553, 269–272. CrossRef
- Abt, H. A. (1990). Trends toward internationalization in astronomical literature. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 102, 368–372. CrossRef
- Abt, H. A. (1994). The current burst in astronomical publications. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 106, 1015–1017. CrossRef
- Abt, H. A. (2000). Astronomical publication in the near future. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 112, 1417–1420. CrossRef
- Abt, H. A. (2007). The frequency of multinational papers in various sciences. Scientometrics, 72, 105–115. CrossRef
- Basu, A., & Lewison, G. (2005). Going beyond journal classification for evaluation of research outputs—A case study of global astronomy and astrophysics research. ASLIB Proceedings, 57(3), 232–246. CrossRef
- Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. CrossRef
- Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A. (1991). Elements of information theory (99th ed.). New York: Wiley. CrossRef
- Fernandez, J. A. (1998). The transition from an individual science to a collective one: The case of astronomer. Scientometrics, 42, 61–74. CrossRef
- Garfield, E., Pudovkin, A. I., & Istomin, V. S. (2003). Why do we need algorithmic historiography? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54, 400–412. CrossRef
- Gray, J., Liu, D. T., Santisteban, M. N., Szalay, A. S., DeWitt, D., & Heber, G. (2005). Scientific data management in the coming decade. Microsoft Research Technical Report MSR-TR-2005-10. Redmond, WA. http://research.microsoft.com/~Gray/. Accessed 27 May 2007.
- Grupp, H. (1990). The concept of entropy in scientometrics and innovation research. Scientometrics, 18, 219–239. CrossRef
- Leydesdorff, L., & Hellsten, I. (2005). Metaphors and diaphors in science communication. Science Communication, 27(1), 64–99. CrossRef
- Leydesdorff, L., & Hellsten, I. (2006). Measuring the meaning of words in contexts: An automated analysis of controversies about ‘Monarch butterflies’, ‘Frankenfoods’, and ‘stem cells’. Scientometircs, 67(2), 231–285. CrossRef
- Purvis, A., & Hector, A. (2000). Getting the measure of biodiversity. Nature, 405, 212–219. CrossRef
- Schilling, G. (2001). The virtual observatory moves closer to reality. Science, 289(5477), 238, July 14.
- Schmidt, M., Glaser, J., Havemann, F., & Hewz, M. (2006). A methodological study for measuring the diversity of science. In Proceedings International Workshop on Webometrics, Informetrics and Scientometrics & Seventh COLLNET Meeting (pp. 129–137), Nancy, France.
- Small, H. (2004). Why authors think their papers are highly cited. Scientometrics, 60(3), 305–316. CrossRef
- Swanson, D. R., Smalheiser, N. R., & Torvik, V. I. (2006). Ranking indirect connections in literature-based discovery: The role of medical subject headings. Journal of American Society of Information Science and Technology, 57(11), 1427–1439. CrossRef
- Szalay, A. S. (2001). The national virtual observatory. In F. R. Harnden, F. A. Primini, Jr., & H. E. Payne (Eds.), Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems X ASP Conference Series, 238, pp. 3–12.
- Szalay, A. S., Kunszt, P., Thakar, A., Gray, J., Slutz, D., & Bruner, R. J. (2000). Designing and mining multi-terabyte astronomy archives: The Sloan Digital Sky Survey. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD, Austin, TX, May 2000.
- Toutanova, K., Klein, D., Manning, C. D., & Singer, Y. (2003). Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of Human Language Technology Conference and North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT-NAACL) (pp. 252–259), Edmonton, Canada, May 2003.
- Toutanova, K., & Manning, C. D. (2000). Enriching the knowledge sources used in a maximum entropy part-of-speech tagger. In Proceedings of the Joint SIGDAT Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Very Large Corpora (EMNLP/VLC-2000) (pp. 63–70), Hong Kong, China, October 2000.
- White, S. D. M. (2007). Fundamentalist physics: Why Dark Energy is bad for astronomy. Reports on Progress in Physics, 70, 883–897. CrossRef
- York, D. G., Adelman, J., Anderson, J. E., Anderson, S. F., Annis, J., Bahcall, N. A., et al. (2000). The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical summary. The Astronomical Journal, 120, 1579–1587. CrossRef
- Scientometrics of big science: a case study of research in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
Volume 86, Issue 1 , pp 1-14
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Entropy analysis
- Publication analysis
- Sloan Digital Sky Survey
- Large-scale scientific project
- Industry Sectors