Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis
The h-index has received an enormous attention for being an indicator that measures the quality of researchers and organizations. We investigate to what degree authors can inflate their h-index through strategic self-citations with the help of a simulation. We extended Burrell’s publication model with a procedure for placing self-citations, following three different strategies: random self-citation, recent self-citations and h-manipulating self-citations. The results show that authors can considerably inflate their h-index through self-citations. We propose the q-index as an indicator for how strategically an author has placed self-citations, and which serves as a tool to detect possible manipulation of the h-index. The results also show that the best strategy for an high h-index is publishing papers that are highly cited by others. The productivity has also a positive effect on the h-index.
- Aksnes, D. (2003). A macro study of self-citation. Scientometrics 56(2), 235–246. CrossRef
- Burrell, Q. L. (2007). Should the h-index be discounted? ISSI Newsletter, 3-S, 65–67.
- Burrell, Q. L. (2007). Hirsch’s h-index: A stochastic model. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 16–25. CrossRef
- Egghe, L. (2006) Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152 doi:10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7. CrossRef
- Garcia-Perez, M. (2009). A multidimensional extension to Hirschs h-index. Scientometrics, 81(3):779–785. CrossRef
- Glänzel, W., & Schoepflin, U. (1994). A stochastic model for the ageing of scientific literature. Scientometrics, 30(1), 49–64. CrossRef
- Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1995). Predictive aspects of a stochastic model for citation processes. Information Processing and Management, 31(1), 69–80. CrossRef
- Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., & Schlemmer, B. (2004). A bibliometric approach to the role of author self-citations in scientific communication. Scientometrics, 59(1), 63–77. CrossRef
- Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572. CrossRef
- Labbe, C. (2010). Ike Antkare one of the great stars in the scientific firmament. ISSI Newsletter, 6(2), 48–52.
- Meho, L. I., & Yang, K. (2007). Impact of data sources on citation counts and rankings of lis faculty: Web of science versus scopus and google scholar. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58(13), 2105–2125. doi:10.1002/asi.20677. CrossRef
- Van Noorden, R. (2010). Metrics: A profusion of measures. Nature, 465, 864–866. CrossRef
- Panaretos, J., & Malesios, C. (2009). Assessing scientific research performance and impact with single indices. Scientometrics, 81(3), 635–670. CrossRef
- Prathap, G. (2010). Is there a place for a mock h-index? Scientometrics, 84(1), 153–165. CrossRef
- Schreiber, M. (2007). Self-citation corrections for the Hirsch index. Europhysics Letters, 78(3). 0002. CrossRef
- Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(9), 628–638. CrossRef
- Silverman, B. W. (2009). Comment: Bibliometrics in the context of the UK research assessment exercise. Statistical Science 24(1), 15–16. CrossRef
- Detecting h-index manipulation through self-citation analysis
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Volume 87, Issue 1 , pp 85-98
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors