A new approach to analyzing patterns of collaboration in co-authorship networks: mesoscopic analysis and interpretation
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper focuses on methods to study patterns of collaboration in co-authorship networks at the mesoscopic level. We combine qualitative methods (participant interviews) with quantitative methods (network analysis) and demonstrate the application and value of our approach in a case study comparing three research fields in chemistry. A mesoscopic level of analysis means that in addition to the basic analytic unit of the individual researcher as node in a co-author network, we base our analysis on the observed modular structure of co-author networks. We interpret the clustering of authors into groups as bibliometric footprints of the basic collective units of knowledge production in a research specialty. We find two types of coauthor-linking patterns between author clusters that we interpret as representing two different forms of cooperative behavior, transfer-type connections due to career migrations or one-off services rendered, and stronger, dedicated inter-group collaboration. Hence the generic coauthor network of a research specialty can be understood as the overlay of two distinct types of cooperative networks between groups of authors publishing in a research specialty. We show how our analytic approach exposes field specific differences in the social organization of research.
- Acedo, F., Barroso, C., Casanueva, C., & Galán, J. (2006). Co-authorship in management and organizational studies: An empirical and network analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 957. CrossRef
- Adams, J., Gurney, K., & Jackson, L. (2008). Calibrating the zoom—A test of Zitt’s hypothesis. Scientometrics, 75(1), 81–95. CrossRef
- Althouse, B., West, J., Bergstrom, T., & Bergstrom, C. (2008). Differences in impact factor across fields and over time. Arxiv preprint arXiv:0804.3116.
- Barabasi, A., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., et al. (2002). Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 311(3–4), 590–614. CrossRef
- Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A., & Zitt, M. (2007). A modular sequence of retrieval procedures to delineate a scientific field: From vocabulary to citations and back. In Proceedings of 11th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (ISSI 2007), Madrid, Spain, pp. 25 ff.
- Batagelj, V., & Mrvar, A. (2003). Analysis and visualization of large networks. In M. Juenger & P. Mutzel (Eds.), Graph drawing software (pp. 77–103). Berlin: Springer.
- Caruana, R., Elhawary, M., Nguyen, N., & Smith, C. (2006). Meta clustering. In Proceedings of the sixth international conference on data mining (ICDM’06).
- Crane, D. (1972). Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2007). Community structure in graphs. arxiv: 0712.271.
- Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks—Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239. CrossRef
- Fry, J., & Talja, S. (2007). The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 115. CrossRef
- Glänzel, W., & de Lange, C. (1997). Modelling and measuring multilateral co-authorship in international scientific collaboration. Part II. A comparative study on the extent and change of international scientific collaboration links. Scientometrics, 40(3), 605–626. CrossRef
- Glänzel, W., & de Lange, C. (2002). A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 54(1), 75–89. CrossRef
- Guimera, R., Sales-Pardo, M., & Amaral, L. (2007). Classes of complex networks defined by role-to-role connectivity profiles. Nature Physics, 3(1), 63–69. CrossRef
- Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures—How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Kretschmer, H. (1994). Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutionalized communities. Scientometrics, 30(1), 363–369. CrossRef
- Kretschmer, H. (2004). Author productivity and geodesic distance in bibliographic co-authorship networks, and visibility on the Web. Scientometrics, 60(3), 409–420. CrossRef
- Leclerc, M., & Gagné, J. (1994). International scientific cooperation: The continentalization of science. Scientometrics, 31(3), 261–292. CrossRef
- Leydesdorff, L., & Wagner, C. (2008). International collaboration in science and the formation of a core group. Journal of Informetrics, 2(4), 317–325. CrossRef
- Liberman, S., & Wolf, K. B. (1998). Bonding number in scientific disciplines. Social Networks, 20(3), 239–246. CrossRef
- Lievrouw, L. A. (1990). Reconceiling structure and process in the study of scholarly communication. In C. L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly communication and bibliometrics. London: Sage Publications.
- Liu, X., Bollen, J., Nelson, M., & Van de Sompel, H. (2005). Co-authorship networks in the digital library research community. Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1462–1480. CrossRef
- Moed, H., Burger, W., Frankfort, J., & Van Raan, A. (1985). The application of bibliometric indicators: Important field-and time-dependent factors to be considered. Scientometrics, 8(3), 177. CrossRef
- Mogoutov, A., & Kahane, B. (2007). Data search strategy for science and technology emergence: A scalable and evolutionary query for nanotechnology tracking. Research Policy, 36(6), 893–903. CrossRef
- Morris, S. (2005). Manifestation of emerging specialties in journal literature: A growth model of papers, references, exemplars, bibliographic coupling, cocitation, and clustering coefficient distribution. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(12), 1250–1273. CrossRef
- Morris, S., Goldstein, M., & Deyong, C. (2007). Manifestation of research teams in journal literature: A growth model of papers, authors, collaboration, coauthorship, weak ties, and Lotka’s law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(12), 1764–1782. CrossRef
- Nepusz, T., Petróczi, A., Négyessy, L., & Bazsó, F. (2008). Fuzzy communities and the concept of bridgeness in complex networks. Physical Review E, 77(1), 16107. CrossRef
- Newman, M. (2001a). The structure of scientific collaboration networks. PNAS, 98(2), 404–409. CrossRef
- Newman, M. (2001b). Scientific collaboration networks. I. Network construction and fundamental results. Physical Review E, 64(1), 16131. CrossRef
- Newman, M. (2004). Fast algorithm for detecting community structure in networks. Physical Review E, 69, 066133. CrossRef
- Palla, G., Derenyi, I., Farkas, I., & Vicsek, T. (2005). Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature, 435(7043), 814–818. CrossRef
- Radicchi, F., et al. (2004). Defining and identifying communities in networks. PNAS, 101(9), 2658–2663. CrossRef
- Rosvall, M., & Bergstrom, C. (2007). An information-theoretic framework for resolving community structure in complex networks. PNAS, 104(18), 7327. CrossRef
- Schaeffer, S. (2007). Graph clustering. Computer Science Review, 1(1), 27–64. CrossRef
- Seglen, P., & Aksnes, D. (2000). Scientific productivity and group size: A bibliometric analysis of Norwegian microbiological research. Scientometrics, 49(1), 125–143. CrossRef
- Sen, P. (2006). Complexities of social networks: A Physicist’s perspective. Arxiv preprint physics, 0605072.
- Snyder, H., & Bonzi, S. (1998). Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980–1989). Journal of Information Science, 24(6), 431. CrossRef
- Wagner, C. S., & Leydesdorff, L. (2005). Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Research Policy, 34, 1608–1618. CrossRef
- Whitley, R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Zitt, M., Bassecoulard, E., & Okubo, Y. (2000). Shadows of the past in international cooperation: Collaboration profiles of the top five producers of science. Scientometrics, 47(3), 627–657. CrossRef
- Zitt, M., Ramanana-Rahary, S., & Bassecoulard, E. (2005). Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation. Scientometrics, 63(2), 373–401. CrossRef
- Zuccala, A. (2006). Modeling the invisible college. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(2), 152–168. CrossRef
- A new approach to analyzing patterns of collaboration in co-authorship networks: mesoscopic analysis and interpretation
Volume 85, Issue 1 , pp 219-242
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Network analysis
- Co-author networks
- Scientific communication
- Industry Sectors