The role of correspondence sections in post-publication peer review: A bibliometric study of general and internal medicine journals
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Scientific journals claim that correspondence sections are for post-publication peer review. We compared the conditions for submission and the bibliometrics of letters-to-editors published in leading medical journals in 2002 and 2007 using journal-derived information and data from PubMed and Journal Citation Reports. The median time limit for letter submissions decreased from 6 to 3.5 weeks, the median word limit from 400 to 350. The median number of letters per published article was near one in both years. Only about half of the letters were followed by an author reply in either year. Electronic response systems were available for four journals in 2007.
- Peers reviewed. Lancet, 1 (1989): 1115–1116.
- Altman, D. G. (2002) Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do?. JAMA 287: pp. 2765-2767 CrossRef
- Altman, D. G. (2005) Unjustified restrictions on letters to the editor. PLoS Med. 2: pp. e126 CrossRef
- Bhopal, R. S., Tonks, A. (1994) The role of letters in reviewing research. BMJ 308: pp. 1582-1583
- Boyton, R. J., Arnold, P.C. (1990) An audit of the BMJ’s correspondence columns. BMJ 301: pp. 1419-1420 CrossRef
- Butler, C. (2003) Old letters, new rules. Lancet 361: pp. 706 CrossRef
- Caswell, A. (1992) Letters to the editor 1991. An audit of the MJA’s correspondence columns. Med. J. Aust. 157: pp. 63-64
- Chew, M., Villanueva, E. V., Der Weyden, M. B. (2007) Life and times of the impact factor: retrospective analysis of trends for seven medical journals (1994–2005) and their Editors’ views. J. R. Soc. Med. 100: pp. 142-150 CrossRef
- Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Code of conduct for editors of biomedical journals. Available at: http://publicationethics.org./code-conduct (2007).
- Crossan, L., Delamothe, T. (1998) Letters to the editor: the new order. Please respond to articles using website, email, or disk-but not paper. BMJ 316: pp. 1406-1410
- Davies, S. (2003) New edicts for letters to the editor — Be electronic, bold, and concise — no more than 300 words. BMJ 326: pp. 63-64 CrossRef
- Golubic, R., Rudes, M., Kovacic, N., Marusic, M., Marusic, A. (2008) Calculating impact factor: how bibliographical classification of journal items affects the impact factor of large and small journals. Sci. Eng. Ethics. 14: pp. 41-49 CrossRef
- Horton, R. (2002) Postpublication criticism and the shaping of clinical knowledge. JAMA 287: pp. 2843-2847 CrossRef
- Mahesh, S., Kabos, M., Walvoort, H. C., Overbeke, A. J. (2001) Significance of letters published in the Dutch Journal of Medicine, 1997/98. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 145: pp. 531-535
- Maric, C., Harris, P. J., Alcorn, D. (2004) Notice of retraction of article. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 31: pp. 657-658 CrossRef
- Maron, N. L., Smith, K. K. (2008) Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication. Results of an Investigation Conducted by Ithaka for the Association of Research Libraries. Association of Research Libraries., Washington, DC
- Mullan, Z. (2003) Lancet correspondence: old letters, new rules. Lancet 361: pp. 12 CrossRef
- Mullan, Z. (2006) Letters or lectures?. Lancet 367: pp. 1042 CrossRef
- O’connor, P. (2004) Changes in renal medullary volume account for the relationship between arterial pressure and renal medullary interstitial cell lipid granule content. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 31: pp. 658 CrossRef
- Rennie, D. (1998) Freedom and responsibility in medical publication: setting the balance right. JAMA 280: pp. 300-302 CrossRef
- Seglen, P. O. (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 314: pp. 498-502
- Stang, A., Poole, C., Schmidt-Pokrzywniak, A. (2008) Pre-peer review, peer review, and post-peer review: Three areas with potential for improvement. J Clin Epidemiol 61: pp. 309-310 CrossRef
- World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). Policies on Letters to the Editor. March 2, 2007 to March 7, 2007. Available at: http://www.wame.org/wame-listserve-discussions/policies-on-letters-to-the-editor
- World Association of Medical Editors (WAME). Case Consultation: Authors Do Not Respond to Critical Letters to the Editor. May 2003. Available at: http://www.wame.org/ethics-resources/. (2003).
- Annals of Internal Medicine. Philadelphia. American College of Physicians. ISSN: 0003-4819. Authors instructions available at: http://www.annals.org/shared/author_info.shtml#manuscriptpreparation
- Annual Review of Medicine. Palo Alto. Annual Reviews. ISSN: 0066-4219. Authors instructions available at: http://arjournals.annualreviews.org/help?context=additionalInformation#Authors.
- Archives of Internal Medicine. Chicago. American Medical Association. ISSN: 0003-9926. Author instructions available at: http://archinte.ama-assn.org/misc/authors.dtl.
- BMJ: British Medical Journal. London. British Medical Association. ISSN: 0959-8146. Authors instructions available at: http://resources.bmj.com/bmj/authors.
- CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association Journal. Ottawa. Canadian Medical Association. ISSN: 0820-3946. Authors instructions available at: http://www.cmaj.ca/authors/index.shtml.
- JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association. Chicago. American Medical Association. ISSN: 0002-9955. Authors instructions available at: http://jama.ama-assn.org/misc/authors.dtl.
- Lancet. London. Lancet Publishing Group. ISSN: 0140-6736. Authors instructions available at: http://www.thelancet.com/authors/lancet/authorinfo
- Medicine. Baltimore. Lippincott Williams Wilkins. ISSN: 0025-7974. Authors instructions available at: http://www.editorialmanager.com/md/.
- New England Journal of Medicine. Boston, Massachusetts Medical Society. ISSN: 0028-4793. Author instructions available at: http://authors.nejm.org/Misc/LetterInstrx.asp.
- Pediatrics. Elk Grove Village, IL. American Academy of Pediatrics. ISSN: 0031-4005. Author instructions available at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/.
- PLoS Medicine. San Francisco. Public Library of Science. ISSN: 1549-1277. Authors instructions available at: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/guidelines.php.
- PLoS ONE. San Francisco. Public Library of Science. ISSN: 1932-6203 Author instructions available at: http://www.plosone.org/static/commentGuidelines.action.
- The role of correspondence sections in post-publication peer review: A bibliometric study of general and internal medicine journals
Volume 81, Issue 3 , pp 747-755
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Finkenhubelweg 11, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland
- 2. German Cochrane Centre, Department of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University Medical Centre, Freiburg, Germany
- 3. Clinical Trials Unit (CTU), Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland