Citation expectations: are they realized? Study of the Matthew index for Russian papers published abroad
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
We consider the “Matthew effect” in the citation process which leads to reallocation (or misallocation) of the citations received by scientific papers within the same journals. The case when such reallocation correlates with a country where an author works is investigated. Russian papers in chemistry and physics published abroad were examined. We found that in both disciplines in about 60% of journals Russian papers are cited less than average ones. However, if we consider each discipline as a whole, citedness of a Russian paper in physics will be on the average level, while chemistry publications receive about 16% citations less than one may expect from the citedness of the journals where they appear. Moreover, Russian chemistry papers mostly become undercited in the leading journals of the field. Characteristics of a “Matthew index” indicator and its significance for scientometric studies are also discussed.
- Ball, R., Mittermaier, B., & Tunger, D. (2009). Creation of journal-based publication profiles of scientific institutions—a methodology for the interdisciplinary comparison of scientific research based on the J-factor. Scientometrics, 81, 381–392. CrossRef
- Bonitz, M. (2002). Ranking of nations and heightened competition in Matthew core journals: Two faces of the Matthew effect for countries. Library Trends, 50, 440–460.
- Bonitz, M. (2005). Ten years Matthew effect for countries. Scientometrics, 64, 375–379. CrossRef
- Bonitz, M., Bruckner, E., & Scharnhorst, A. (1997). Characteristics and impact of the Matthew effect for countries. Scientometrics, 40, 407–422. CrossRef
- Bonitz, M., Bruckner, E., & Scharnhorst, A. (1999). The Matthew index—concentration patterns and Matthew core journals. Scientometrics, 44, 361–378. CrossRef
- Bonitz, M., & Scharnhorst, A. (2001). Competition in science and the Matthew core journals. Scientometrics, 51, 37–54. CrossRef
- Bordons, M., Fernandez, M. T., & Gomez, I. (2002). Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country. Scientometrics, 53, 195–206. CrossRef
- Egghe, L. (1988). Mathematical relations between impact factors and average number of citations. Information Processing & Management, 24, 567–576. CrossRef
- Larivière, V., Gingras, Y. (in print). The impact factor’s Matthew effect: A natural experiment in bibliometrics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Retrieved September 18, 2009 from http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0908/0908.3177.pdf.
- Medoff, M. H. (2006). Evidence of a Harvard and Chicago Matthew effect. Journal of Economic Methodology, 13, 485–506. CrossRef
- Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 3810, 56–63. CrossRef
- Merton, R. K. (1988). The Matthew effect in science, II: Cumulative advantage and the symbolism of intellectual property. ISIS, 79, 606–623. CrossRef
- Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., & Hibel, J. (2008). Matthew effects for whom? Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 187–198. CrossRef
- Rousseau, R. (1988). Citation distribution of pure mathematics journals. In L. Egghe & R. Rousseau (Eds.), Informetrics 87/88 (pp. 249–262). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
- Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9, 281–291. CrossRef
- Schubert, A., Glänzel, W., & Braun, T. (1983). Relative citation rate: A new indicator for measuring the impact of publications. In D. Tomov & L. Dimitrova (Eds.), Proceedings of the first national conference with international participation on scientometrics and linguistics of scientific text (pp. 80–81). Bulgaria: Varna.
- Thomson Reuters (2009). Why the number of articles in Web of Science has gone down, and the number of proceedings papers has gone up. Retrieved April 9, 2009 from http://isiwebofknowledge.com/products_tools/multidisciplinary/webofscience/cpci/usingproceedings/.
- Vinkler, P. (1997). Relations of relative scientometric impact indicators. The relative publication strategy index. Scientometrics, 40, 163–169. CrossRef
- Zitt, M., Ramanana-Rahary, S., & Bassecoulard, E. (2003). Correcting glasses help fair comparisons in international science landscape: Country indicators as a function of ISI database delineation. Scientometrics, 56, 259–282. CrossRef
- Citation expectations: are they realized? Study of the Matthew index for Russian papers published abroad
Volume 83, Issue 3 , pp 739-749
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Matthew index
- International comparison
- Industry Sectors