Characterizing knowledge diffusion of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology by citation analysis
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This study investigates the knowledge diffusion patterns of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology (N&N) by analyzing the overall research interactions between N&N and nano-related subjects through citation analysis. Three perspectives were investigated to achieve this purpose. Firstly, the overall research interactions were analyzed to identify the dominant driving forces in advancing the development of N&N. Secondly, the knowledge diffusion intensity between N&N and nano-related subjects was investigated to determine the areas most closely related to N&N. Thirdly, the diffusion speed was identified to detect the time distance of knowledge diffusion between N&N and nano-related subjects. The analysis reveals that driving forces from the outside environment rather than within N&N itself make the foremost contributions to the development of N&N. From 1998 to 2007, Material Science, Physics, Chemistry, N&N, Electrical & Electronic and Metallurgy & Metallurgical Engineering are the key contributory and reference subjects for N&N. Knowledge transfer within N&N itself is the quickest. And the speed of knowledge diffusion from other subjects to N&N is slower than that from N&N to other subjects, demonstrating asymmetry of knowledge diffusion in the development of N&N. The results indicate that N&N has matured into a relatively open, diffuse and dynamic system of interactive subjects.
- Alcacer, J., & Gittelman, M. (2006). Patent citations as a measure of knowledge flows: The influence of examiner citations. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88(4), 774–779. CrossRef
- Amin, M., & Mabe, M. (2003). Impact factors: Use and abuse. Medicina (Buenos Aires), 63(4), 347–354.
- Bassecoulard, E., Lelu, A., & Zitt, M. (2007). Mapping nanosciences by citation flows: A preliminary analysis. Scientometrics, 70(3), 859–880. CrossRef
- Bettencourt, L. M. A., Cintron, A. A., Kaiser, D. I., & Castillo, C. C. (2006). The power of a good idea: Quantitative modeling of the spread of ideas from epidemiological models. Physica A, 364, 513–536. CrossRef
- Borner, K., Penumarthy, S., Meiss, M., & Ke, W. (2006). Mapping the diffusion of scholarly knowledge among major U.S. research institutions. Scientometrics, 68(3), 415–426. CrossRef
- Braun, T., Schubert, A., & Zsindely, S. (1997). Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance. Scientometrics, 38(2), 321–325. CrossRef
- Chen, C. M., & Hicks, D. (2004). Tracing knowledge diffusion. Scientometrics, 59(2), 199–211. CrossRef
- Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). The influence of publication delays on the observed aging distribution of scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(2), 158–1625. CrossRef
- ESRC. (2003). The social and economic challenges of nanotechnology, Report by Wood, S., Jones, R., & Geldart, A., ISBN 086226-294-1. The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), UK.
- Estabrooks, C. A., Derksen, L., Winther, C., et al. (2008). The intellectual structure and substance of the knowledge utilization field: A longitudinal author co-citation analysis, 1945 to 2004, Implementation Science: 3–49. Available at: http://www.implementationscience.com/content/3/1/49.
- Granovetter, M. (1973). Strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. CrossRef
- Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 557–586. CrossRef
- Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: the role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111. CrossRef
- Huang, Z., Chen, H., Chen, Z. K., & Roco, M. C. (2004). International nanotechnology development in 2003: country, institution, and technology field analysis based on USPTO patent database. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 6(4), 325–354. CrossRef
- Huang, Z., Chen, H., Yan, L., & Roco, M. (2005). Longitudinal nanotechnology development (1991–2002): National science foundation funding and its impact on patents. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 7, 343–376. CrossRef
- Huang, M. H., Chiang, L. Y., & Chen, D. Z. (2003). Constructing a patent citation map using bibliographic coupling: a study of Taiwan’s high-tech companies. Scientometrics, 58(3), 489–506. CrossRef
- Hullmann, A., & Meyer, M. (2003). Publications and patents in nanotechnology. Scientometrics, 58(3), 507–527. CrossRef
- Igami, M. (2008). Exploration of the evolution of nanotechnology via mapping of patent applications. Scientometrics, 77(2), 289–308. CrossRef
- Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (1996). Flows of knowledge from universities and federal laboratories: modeling the flow of patent citations over time and across institutional and geographic boundaries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 93(23), 12671–12677.
- Karki, M. M. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Inform, 19, 269–272. CrossRef
- Kostoff, R. N., Barth, R. B., & Lau, C. G. (2008a). Quality vs. quantity of publications in nanotechnology field from the People’s Republic of China. Chinese Science Bulletin, 53(8), 1272–1280. CrossRef
- Kostoff, R. N., Barth, R. B., & Lau, C. G. (2008b). Relation of seminal nanotechnology document production to total nanotechnology document production-South Korea. Scientometrics, 76(1), 43–67. CrossRef
- Kostoff, R. N., Koytcheff, R. G., & Lau, C. G. Y. (2007). Global nanotechnology research metrics. Scientometrics, 70(3), 565–601. CrossRef
- Leydesdoref, L. (2008). The delineation of nanoscience and nanotechnology in terms of journals and patents: A most recent update. Scientometrics, 76(1), 59–167.
- Leydesdoref, L., & Wagner, C. (2009). Is the United States losing ground in science? A global perspective on the world science system. Scientometrics, 78(1), 23–36. CrossRef
- Leydesdoref, L., & Zhou, P. (2007). Nanotechnology as a field of science: Its delineation in terms of journals and patents. Scientometrics, 70(3), 693–713. CrossRef
- Li, X., Chcn, H., Huang, Z., & Roco, M. C. (2007a). Patent citation network in nanotechnology (1976–2004). Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9(3), 337–352. CrossRef
- Li, X., Lin, Y. L., Chen, H., & Mihail, C. R. (2007b). Worldwide nanotechnology development: A comparative study of USPTO, EPO, and JPO patents (1976–2004). Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 9(6), 977–1002. CrossRef
- Meyer, M. (2000a). Patent citations in a novel field of technology—what can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology? Scientometrics, 48(2), 151–178. CrossRef
- Meyer, M. (2000b). Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29(3), 409–434. CrossRef
- Meyer, M. (2000c). What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics, 49(1), 93–123. CrossRef
- Meyer, M. (2001). Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology. Scientometrics, 51(1), 163–183. CrossRef
- Meyer, M. (2007). What do we know about innovation in nanotechnology? Some propositions about an emerging field between hype and path-dependency. Scientometrics, 70(3), 779–810. CrossRef
- Meyer, M., & Persson, O. (1998). Nanotechnology-interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application. Scientometrics, 42(2), 195–205. CrossRef
- Oppenheim, C. (2000). Do patent citations count? In B. Cromin & H. B. Atkins (Eds.), The web of knowledge (pp. 405–432). Medford: Information Today, Inc.
- Parr, D. (2005). Will nanotechnology make the world a better place? Trends in Biotechnology, 23(8), 395–398. CrossRef
- Pavitt, K. (1998). Do patents reflect the useful output of universities? Research Evaluation, 7(2), 105–111.
- Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: Free Press.
- Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Population Economics, 98, S71–S102.
- Royal Society. (2003). Nanoscience and nanotechnology. http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/nanotechnology, last accessed August 4, 2005.
- Shin, H. J. (1999). Research interactivity of cognitive science: A bibliometric analysis of interdisciplinarity, Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
- Singh, J. (2005). Collaborative networks as determinants of knowledge diffusion patterns. Management Science, 51(5), 756–770. CrossRef
- Singh, J. (2007). Asymmetry of knowledge spillovers between MNCs and host country firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5), 764–786. CrossRef
- Sorenson, O., Rivkin, J. W., & Fleming, L. (2006). Complexity, networks and knowledge flow. Research Policy, 35(7), 994–1017. CrossRef
- Tijssen, R. J. W. (2001). Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30, 35–54. CrossRef
- Waguespack, D. M., & Birnir, J. K. (2005). Foreignness and the diffusion of ideas. Journal of Engineering & Technology Management, 22(1–2), 31–50. CrossRef
- Wojick, D. E., Warnick, W. L., Carroll, B. C., & Crowe, J. (2006). The digital road to scientific knowledge diffusion: a faster, better way to scientific progress? D-Lib Magazine, 12(6). Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june06/wojick/06wojick.html.
- Youtie, J., Shapira, P., & Proter, A. L. (2008). Nanotechnology publications and citations by leading countries and blocs. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 10, 981–986. CrossRef
- Yu, G., Guo, R., & Li, Y. J. (2006). The influence of publication delays on three ISI indicators. Scientometrics, 69(3), 511–527. CrossRef
- Yu, G., Wang, X. H., & Yu, D. R. (2005). The influence of publication delays on impact factors in the scientific field. Scientometrics, 64(2), 235–246. CrossRef
- Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (2006). Delineating complex scientific fields by an hybrid lexical-citation method: An application to nanosciences. Information Processing and Management, 42, 1513–1531. CrossRef
- Characterizing knowledge diffusion of Nanoscience & Nanotechnology by citation analysis
Volume 84, Issue 1 , pp 81-97
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Knowledge diffusion
- Nanoscience & Nanotechnology
- Citation analysis
- Industry Sectors