Date: 30 Aug 2013
Climate Consensus and ‘Misinformation’: A Rejoinder to Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Agnotology is the study of how ignorance arises via circulation of misinformation calculated to mislead. Legates et al. (Sci Educ 22:2007–2017, 2013) had questioned the applicability of agnotology to politically-charged debates. In their reply, Bedford and Cook (Sci Educ 22:2019–2030, 2013), seeking to apply agnotology to climate science, asserted that fossil-fuel interests had promoted doubt about a climate consensus. Their definition of climate ‘misinformation’ was contingent upon the post-modernist assumptions that scientific truth is discernible by measuring a consensus among experts, and that a near unanimous consensus exists. However, inspection of a claim by Cook et al. (Environ Res Lett 8:024024, 2013) of 97.1 % consensus, heavily relied upon by Bedford and Cook, shows just 0.3 % endorsement of the standard definition of consensus: that most warming since 1950 is anthropogenic. Agnotology, then, is a two-edged sword since either side in a debate may claim that general ignorance arises from misinformation allegedly circulated by the other. Significant questions about anthropogenic influences on climate remain. Therefore, Legates et al. appropriately asserted that partisan presentations of controversies stifle debate and have no place in education.
Akasofu, S.-I. (2010). On the recovery from the little ice age. Natural Science, 2, 1211–1224.CrossRef
Alley, R. B. (2007). Wally was right: Predictive ability of the North Atlantic ‘conveyor belt’ hypothesis for abrupt climate change. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Science, 35, 241–272.CrossRef
Amstrup, S. C., Marcot, B. G., & Douglas, D. C. (2007). Forecasting the range wide status of polar bears at selected times in the 21st century. Anchorage, Alaska: USGS Alaska Science Center.
Anagnostopoulos, G. G., Koutsoyiannis, D. K., Christofides, A., Efstratiadis, A., & Mamassis, N. (2010). A comparison of local and aggregated climate model outputs with observed data. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 55, 1094–1110.CrossRef
Anderegg, W. R. L., Prall, J. W., Harold, J., & Schneider, S. H. (2010). Expert credibility in climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 107, 12107–12109.CrossRef
Armstrong, J. S., Green, K. C., & Soon, W. (2008). Polar bear population forecasts: A public-policy forecasting audit. Interfaces, 38, 382–405.CrossRef
Bedford, D. (2010). Agnotology as a teaching tool: Learning climate science by studying misinformation. Journal of Geography, 109, 159–165.CrossRef
Bedford, D., & Cook, J. (2013). Agnotology, scientific consensus, and the teaching and learning of climate change: A response to Legates, Soon and Briggs. Science & Education, 22, 2019–2030.CrossRef
Brindley, H., & Allan, R. P. (2003). Simulations of the effects of interannual and decadal variability on the clear-sky outgoing long-wave radiation spectrum. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 129, 2971–2988.CrossRef
Choi, Y.-S. (2011). How sensitive is the Earth’s climate to a runaway carbon dioxide? Journal of Korean Earth Science Society, 32, 239–247.CrossRef
Cook, J., Nuccitelli, D., Green, S. A., Richardson, M., Winkler, B., Painting, R., et al. (2013). Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature. Environmental Research Letters, 8, 024024.CrossRef
David, L., & Gordon, C. (2007). The down-to-earth guide to global warming. London, UK: Orchard Books.
Ding, D., Maibach, E. W., Zhao, X., Roser-Renouf, C., & Leiserowitz, A. (2011). Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement. Nature Climate Change, 1, 462–465.CrossRef
Doran, P., & Zimmerman, M. (2009). Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. EOS. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 99, 22–23.CrossRef
Essex, C. (1986). Trace gases and the problem of false invariants in climate models—a comment. Climatological Bulletin, 20, 19–25.
Essex, C. (1991). What do climate models tell us about global warming? Pure and Applied Geophysics, 135, 125–133.CrossRef
Feynman, R. P. (1969). What is science? The Physics Teacher, 7, 313–320.CrossRef
Fischer, H., Wahlen, M., Smith, J., Mastroianni, D., & Deck, B. (1999). Ice core records of atmospheric CO2 around the last three glacial terminations. Science, 283, 1712–1714.CrossRef
Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25, 739–755.CrossRef
Ghil, M., Chekroun, M. D., & Simonnet, E. (2008). Climate dynamics and fluid dynamics: Natural variability and related uncertainties. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 237, 2111–2126.CrossRef
Green, K. C., Armstrong, J. S., & Soon, W. (2009). Validity of climate change forecasting for public policy decision making. International Journal of Forecasting, 25, 826–832.CrossRef
Hollander, P. (2013). Peer review, political correctness, and human nature. Academic Questions, 26, 148–156.CrossRef
Huang, Y. (2013). A simulated climatology of spectrally decomposed atmospheric infrared radiation. Journal of Climate, 26, 1702–1715.CrossRef
Huang, Y., Ramaswamy, V., Huang, X., Fu, Q., & Bardeen, C. (2007). A strict test in climate modeling with spectrally resolved radiances: GCM simulation versus AIRS observations. Geophysical Research Letters, 34. doi:10.1029/2007GL031409.
Hunter, C. M., Caswell, H., Runge, M. C., Amstrup, S. C., Regehr, E. V., & Stirling, I. (2007). Polar bears in the Southern Beaufort Sea II: Demography and population growth in relation to sea ice conditions. Anchorage, Alaska: USGS Alaska Science Center.
Huntingford, C., Jones, P. D., Livina, V. N., Lenton, T. M., & Cox, P. M. (2013). No increase in global temperature variability despite changing regional patterns. Nature, forthcoming. doi:10.1038/nature12310.
Huxley, T. H. (1866). On the advisableness of improving natural knowledge. Fortnightly Review.
Kennedy, D. (2006). Acts of god. Science, 311, 303.CrossRef
Knight, J. R., et al. (2009). Do global temperature trends over the last decade falsify climate predictions? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90, S22–S23.
Koutsoyiannis, D. (2010). A random walk on water. Hydrology & Earth System Science, 14, 585–601.CrossRef
Koutsoyiannis, D. K., Efstratiadis, A., Mamassis, N., & Christofides, A. (2008). On the credibility of climate projections. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53, 671–684.CrossRef
Koutsoyiannis, D. K., Montanari, A., Lins, H. F., & Cohn, T. A. (2009). Climate, hydrology and freshwater: Towards an interactive incorporation of hydrological experience into climate research. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54, 394–405.CrossRef
Kukla, G., & Gavin, J. (2004). Milankovitch climate reinforcements. Global and Planetary Change, 40, 27–48.CrossRef
Kukla, G., & Gavin, J. (2005). Did glacials start with global warming? Quaternary Science Reviews, 24, 1547–1557.CrossRef
Landsberg, H. E., & Oliver, J. E. (2005). Climatology. In J. E. Oliver (Ed.), Encyclopedia of world climatology (pp. 272–283). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences Series.CrossRef
Lefsrud, L. M., & Meyer, R. E. (2012). Science or science fiction? Professionals’ discursive construction of climate change. Organization Studies, 33, 1477–1506.CrossRef
Legates, D. R. (2007). An Inconvenient Truth: A focus on its portrayal of the hydrologic cycle. GeoJournal, 70, 15–19.CrossRef
Legates, D. R., Soon, W., & Briggs, W. M. (2013). Learning and teaching climate science: The perils of consensus knowledge using agnotology. Science & Education, 22, 2007–2017.CrossRef
Lenzer, J. (2013). Why we can’t trust clinical guidelines. British Medical Journal, 346, f3830.CrossRef
Lewandowsky, S., Gilles, G., & Vaughan, S. (2012). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3, 399–404.CrossRef
Lindzen, R. S. (2007). Taking greenhouse warming seriously. Energy & Environment, 18, 937–950.CrossRef
Lindzen, R. S., & Choi, Y.-S. (2011). On the observational determination of climate sensitivity and its implications. Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 47, 377–390.CrossRef
Liu, J., Wang, B., Ding, Q., Kuang, X., Soon, W., & Zorita, E. (2009). Centennial variations of the global monsoon precipitation in the last millennium: Results from ECHO-G model. Journal of Climate, 22, 2356–2371.CrossRef
Mahmood, R., et al. (2010). Impacts of land use/land cover change on climate and future research priorities. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 91, 37–46.CrossRef
National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). (2013). Monthly mean CO2 concentration at Mauna Loa, HI. ftp://ftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/ccg/co2/trends/co2_mm_mlo.txt.
Oreskes, N. (2004). The scientific consensus on climate change. Science, 306, 1686 (and Erratum, 21 January 2005).
Pielke, R, Sr. et al. (2009). Climate change: The need to consider human forcings besides greenhouse gases. EOS. Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, 90, 413.CrossRef
Popper, K. R. (1934). Logik der Forchung, Vienna. Reprinted in 1959 as The Logic of Scientific Discovery, London: Hutchinson & Co., p. 480.
Proctor, R. N. (2008). Agnotology: A missing term to describe the cultural production of ignorance (and its study). In R. N. Proctor & L. Schiebinger (Eds.), Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance (pp. 1–33). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Saloranta, T. M. (2001). Post-normal science and the global climate change issue. Climatic Change, 50, 395–404.CrossRef
Soon, W. (2007). Implications of the secondary role of carbon dioxide and methane forcing in climate change: Past, present, and future. Physical Geography, 28, 97–125.CrossRef
Soon, W. (2009). Solar Arctic-mediated climate variation on multidecadal to centennial timescales: Empirical evidence, mechanistic explanation, and testable consequences. Physical Geography, 30, 144–184.CrossRef
Soon, W., Baliunas, S., Idso, C., Idso, S., & Legates, D. R. (2003). Reconstructing climatic and environmental changes of the past 1000 years: A reappraisal. Energy & Environment, 14, 233–296.CrossRef
Soon, W., Baliunas, S., Idso, S. B., Kondratyev, K. Y., & Posmentier, E. S. (2001). Modeling climatic effects of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions: Unknowns and uncertainties. Climate Research, 18, 259–275.CrossRef
Soon, W., Dutta, K., Legates, D. R., Velasco, V., & Zhang, W. (2011). Variation in surface air temperatures of China during the 20th century. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 73, 2331–2344.CrossRef
Steffensen, J. P., et al. (2008). High-resolution Greenland ice core data show abrupt climate change happens in few years. Science, 321, 680–684.CrossRef
Walsh, J. E., Chapman, W. L., & Portis, D. H. (2009). Arctic cloud fraction and radiative fluxes in atmospheric reanalyses. Journal of Climate, 22, 2316–2334.CrossRef
Weiss, K. M. (2012). Agnotology: How can we handle what we don’t know in a knowing way? Evolutionary Anthropology, 21, 96–100.CrossRef
Weissberg, R. (2013). The hidden costs of journal peer review. Academic Questions, 26, 157–165.CrossRef
Wunsch, C. (2002). Ocean observations and the climate forecast problem. In R. P. Pearce (Ed.), Meteorology at the Millennium (pp. 233–245). London, United Kingdom: Academic Press.CrossRef
Wunsch, C. (2010). Towards understanding the Paleocean. Quaternary Science Reviews, 29, 1960–1967.CrossRef
- Climate Consensus and ‘Misinformation’: A Rejoinder to Agnotology, Scientific Consensus, and the Teaching and Learning of Climate Change
Science & Education
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Geography, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, 19716-2541, USA
- 2. Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA
- 3. New York, NY, 10021, USA
- 4. Edinburgh, EH2 1JX, Scotland, UK