Aikenhead, G. S. (1973). The measurement of high school students’ knowledge about science and scientists. Science Education,
Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education,
Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Brennan, J. (2008). Higher education and social change. Higher Education,
Chen, S. Y., & Raffan, J. (1999). Biotechnology: Students knowledge and attitude in the UK and Taiwan. Journal of Biological Education,
Clement, G. (2007). The ethic of care and the problem of wild animals. In J. Donovan & C. J. Adams (Eds.), The feminist care tradition in animal ethics (pp. 301–315). New York: Columbia University Press.
Cobern, W. W. (1996). World view theory and conceptual change. Science Education, 80
Connelly, F. M., Irvine, F. G., & Enns, R. J. (1980). Stakeholders in curriculum. In F. M. Connelly, A. S. Dukacz, & F. Quinlan (Eds.), Curriculum planning for the classroom (pp. 44–55). Toronto: OISE Press.
Costa, V. B. (1993). School science as a rite of passage: A new frame for familiar problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Costa, V. B. (1995). When science is “another world”: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school and science. Science Education,
Curtin, D. (2007). Toward an ecological ethic of care. In J. Donovan & C. J. Adams (Eds.), The feminist care tradition in animal ethics (pp. 87–104). New York: Columbia University Press.
Donovan, J. (2007). Attention to suffering: Sympathy as a basis for ethical treatment of animals. In J. Donovan & C. J. Adams (Eds.), The feminist care tradition in animal ethics (pp. 174–197). New York: Columbia University Press.
Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education,
Eisner, E., & Vallace, E. (1974). Conflicting conceptions of curriculum. Series on contemporary educational issues. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan Publishing Corporation.
Fensham, P. J. (1985). Science for all. Journal of Curriculum Studies,
Fensham, P. J. (1988a). Approaches to the teaching of STS in science education. International Journal of Science Education,
Fensham, P. J. (1988b). Familiar but different: Some dilemmas and new directions in science education. In P. J. Fensham (Ed.), Developments and dilemmas in science education (pp. 1–26). New York: Falmer Press.
Fensham, P. J. (1992). Science and technology. In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Handbook of research on curriculum (pp. 789–829). New York: Macmillan.
Fowler, S. R., Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2009). Moral sensitivity in the context of socioscientific issues in high school science students. International Journal of Science Education,
Gaskell, J. P. (1982). Science, technology and society: Issues for science teachers. Studies in Science Education,
Gaskell, P. J. (1992). Authentic science and school science. International Journal of Science Education,
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gunter, B., Kinderlerer, J., & Beyleveld, D. (1998). Teenagers and biotechnology: A survey of understanding and opinion in Britain. Studies in Science Education,
Hawkins, J., & Pea, R. D. (1987). Tools for bridging the cultures of everyday and scientific thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,
Hill, R., Stanistreet, M., Boyes, E., & O’Sullivan, H. (1998). Reactions to a new technology: Students ideas about genetically engineered foodstuffs. Research in Science and Technological Education,
Kalantzis, M. (2006). Elements of a science of education. Australian Educational Researcher,
Kilbourne, B. (1980). World views and curriculum. Interchange,
Kolstø, S. D. (2001). Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Science Education,
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education,
Layton, D., Davey, A., & Jenkins, E. (1986). Science for specific purposes (SSSP): Perspectives on adult scientific literacy. Studies in Science Education,
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Lindahl, M. (2009). Ethics or morals—understanding students’ values related to genetic tests on humans. Science & Education,
Lock, R., Miles, C., & Hughes, S. (1995). The influence of teaching on knowledge and attitudes in biotechnology and genetic engineering contexts: Implications for teaching controversial issues and the public understanding of science. School Science Review,
Macer, D., Inaba, M., Maekawa, F., Chen Ng, M., & Obata, H. (2002). Japanese attitudes toward xenotransplantation. Public Understanding of Science,
Manning, R. C. (1992). Speaking from the heart: A feminist perspective on ethics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
McWilliam, W., & Lee, A. (2006). The problem of ‘the problem with educational research’. The Australian Educational Researcher,
Milne, C. E., & Taylor, P. C. (1998). Between myth and a hard place. In W. W. Cobern (Ed.), Sociocultural perspectives on science education (pp. 25–48). Boston: Kluwer.
Pearce, C. E., Thomas, A. P. M., & Clements, D. A. V. (2006). The ethics of xenotransplantation: a survey of student attitudes. Xenotransplantation,
Phelan, P., Davidson, A. L., & Cao, H. T. (1991). Students’ multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly,
Plous, S. (1996). Attitudes toward the use of animals in psychological research and education: Results from a national survey of psychology majors. Psychological Science,
Ratcliffe, M. (1996). Adolescent decision-making, by individuals and groups, about science-related societal issues. In G. Welford, J. Osborne, & P. Scott (Eds.), Research in science education in Europe: Current issues and themes (pp. 126–140). London: Falmer Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Regan, T. (1985). The case for animals rights. In P. Singer (Ed.), In defense of animals (pp. 13–26). New York: Blackwell.
Rios, A. R., Conesa, C. C., Ramírez, P., Rodríguez, M. M., & Parrilla, P. (2004). Public attitude toward xenotransplantation: Opinion survey. Transplantation Procedings,
Roberts, D. A. (2008). Scientific literacy/science literacy. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 729–780). New York: Routledge.
Rolston, H., I. I. I. (2002). What do we mean by the intrinsic value and integrity of plants and animals? In D. Heaf & J. Wirtz (Eds.), Genetic engineering and the intrinsic value and integrity of animals and plants, proceedings of a workshop at the Royal Botanic Garden, Edinburgh, UK (pp. 5–10). Hafan, UK: Ifgene.
Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. R. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science Education,
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2004). The morality of socioscientific issues: Construal and resolution of genetic engineering dilemmas. Science Education,
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. L. (2005). The significance of content knowledge for informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: Applying genetics knowledge to genetic engineering issues. Science Education,
Saucier, D. A., & Cain, M. E. (2006). The foundations of attitudes about animal research. Ethics and Behavior,
Schicktanz, S. (2006). Ethical considerations of human-animal-relationship under conditions of asymmetry and ambivalence. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics,
Singer, P. (2002). Animal liberation. New York: HarperCollins Publishers Inc.
Solomon, J. (1993). Teaching science, technology and society. Philadelphia, CA: Open University Press.
Szkudlarek, T. (2007). Empty signifiers, education and politics. Studies in Philosophy and Education,
Tal, T., & Kedmi, Y. (2006). Teaching socioscientific issues: Classroom culture and students performances. Cultural Studies in Science Education,
Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Young, M. (1971). Knowledge and control: New directions in the sociology of education. London: Collier-Macmillan.
Zeidler, D. L., & Keefer, M. (2003). The role of moral reasoning and the status of socioscientific issues in science education: Philosophical, psychological and pedagogical considerations. In D. L. Zeidler (Ed.), The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education (pp. 7–38). The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Zeidler, D. L., Lederman, N. G., & Taylor, S. C. (1992). Fallacies and student discourse: Conceptualizing the role of critical thinking in science education. Science Education,
Zeidler, D. L., & Sadler, T. D. (2008). The role of moral reasoning in argumentation: Conscience, character and care. In S. Erduran & M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre (Eds.), Argumentation in science education: Perspectives from classroom-based research (pp. 201–216). The Netherlands: Springer.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education,
Zeidler, D. L., Walker, K. A., Ackett, W. A., & Simmons, M. L. (2002). Tangled up in views: Beliefs in the nature of science and responses to socioscientific dilemmas. Science Education,
Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching,