Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Making sense of the elusive paradigm of entrepreneurship

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The term “entrepreneurship” apparently means different things to different people including scholars and thought leaders. Because entrepreneurship is multifaceted, it is studied from many different perspectives, yet, that has fostered a multitude of definitions. Even the scholarly literature (where normally the deepest understanding would be found) is rife with disparities and even contradictions about what is and is not entrepreneurship. Some have suggested a narrower and more defined focus on entrepreneurship where only bona fide entrepreneurship research theories would explain entrepreneurial phenomena. We believe that constricting the field may the wrong approach. Our purpose then is to try and make sense of the disparate meanings and views of entrepreneurship prevalent in both the scholarly literature as well as among thought leaders in business and policy. We reconcile the seemingly chaotic and contradictory literature by proposing a coherent approach to structure the disparate ways that entrepreneurship is used and referred to in the scholarly literature. We examine three coherent strands of the entrepreneurship literature and identify an emerging eclectic view of entrepreneurship, which combines several of the views prevalent in the main approaches discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehman, E. E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 757–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Z. J., & Gifford, S. (1996). Innovation of entrepreneurial firms. Small Business Economics, 8(3), 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. E. (2001). Many are called but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2005). How do entrepreneurs organize firms under conditions of uncertainty? Journal of Management, 31(5), 776–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007a). The entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Journal of Management Studies, 44(7), 1057–1063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007b). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 11–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B. (2012). Entrepreneurship research. Management Decision, 50(5), 755–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J. (2006). Social and commercial entrepreneurship: Same, different, or both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A., & Ensley, M. D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: Evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52, 1331–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumol, W. (1968). Entrepreneurship in economic theory. American Economic Review, 58(2), 64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D., & Meyer, B. (1994). A longitudinal analysis of young entrepreneurs in Australia and the United States. Small Business Economics, 6, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. J. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 26–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, D. (1987). A time series analysis of self-employment in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 95, 445–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandstetter, H. (1997). Becoming an entrepreneur—A question of personality structure? Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 157–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W., & Evans, D. (1989). Small business economics. Small Business Economics, 1, 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruyat, C., & Julien, P. A. (2001). Defining the field of research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, I., & Willard, G. E. (1993). Towards a theory of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(3), 183–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Dictionary.com: Online Business Dictionary. (2014). http://www.businessdictionary.com/.

  • Cantillon, R. (1931). Essai sur la nature du commerce en général, edited and translated by H. Higgs, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardon, M. S., Wincent, J., Singh, J., & Drnovsek, M. (2009). The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 511–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carree, M., van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Wennekers, S. (2002). Economic development and business ownership: An analysis using data of 23 OECD countries in the period 1976–1996. Small Business Economics, 19(3), 271–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, N., Gartner, W., Shaver, K., & Gatewood, E. (2003). The career reasons of nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 13–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarysse, B., Bruneel, J., & Wright, M. (2011). Explaining growth patterns of young technology-based firms: Structuring resource portfolios in different environments. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(2), 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(4), 386–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. C. (1995). Challenges in predicting new venture performance. In I. Bull, H. Thomas, & G. Willard (Eds.), Entrepreneurship: Perspectives on theory building. London: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, D. V., & Forsythe, L. M. (2011). The entrepreneur’s legal companion. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2001). Levels of analysis in entrepreneurship research: Current Practice and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25(4), 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeTienne, D., Shepherd, D. A., & DeCastro, J. O. (2008). The fallacy of “only the strong survive”: The effects of human capital and extrinsic motivation on the persistence decisions of under-performing firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 526–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dew, N., Velamuri, S. R., & Venkataraman, S. (2004). Dispersed knowledge and an entrepreneurial theory of the firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 659–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. M. (1990). Organizational growth: Linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures, 1978–1988. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(3), 504–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D., & Jovanovic, B. (1989). An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 808–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S., & Leighton, L. S. (1989). Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79, 519–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. S., & Leighton, L. S. (1990). Small business formation by unemployed and employed workers. Small Business Economics, 2(4), 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner, W. B. (1989). Some suggestions for research on entrepreneurial traits and characteristics. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(1), 27–38.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Grégoire, D. A., Barr, P. S., & Shepherd, D. A. (2010). Cognitive processes of opportunity recognition. Organization Science, 21, 413–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoang, H., & Gimeno, J. (2010). Becoming a founder: How founder role identity affects entrepreneurial transitions and persistence in founding. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, D. V., & Shepherd, D. A. (2013). Deciding to Persist: Adversity, values, and entrepreneurs’ decision policies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 331–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, T. J., & Schmitz, J. A. (1990). A theory of entrepreneurship and its application to the study of business transfers. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 265–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., Shepherd, D. A., & Bott, J. P. (2009). Managers’ corporate entrepreneurial actions: Examining perception and position. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 236–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Kuratko, D. F. (2009). Conceptualizing corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (2009). Emotion theory and research: Highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 1–25.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, B. (1994). Entrepreneurial choice when people differ in their management and labor skills. Small Business Economics, 6, 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kihlstrom, R., & Laffont, J. (1979). A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 719–748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koontz, H. (1961). The management theory jungle. Academy of Management Journal, 4(3), 174–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koontz, H. (1980). The management theory jungle revisited. Academy of Management Review, 5(2), 175–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., & Audretsch, D. B. (2009). Strategic entrepreneurship: Exploring different perspectives of an emerging concept. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., Covin, J. G., & Hornsby, J. S. (2005). A model of middle-level managers’ entrepreneurial behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(6), 699–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., Ireland, R. D., & Hornsby, J. S. (2001). Improving firm performance through entrepreneurial actions: Acordia’s corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., Montagno, R. V., & Hornsby, J. S. (1990). Developing an intrapreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 49–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., Morris, M. H., & Schindehutte, M. (2015). Understanding the dynamics of entrepreneurship through framework approaches. Small Business Economics Journal, 45(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner, J., Leamon, A., & Hardymon, F. (2012). Venture capital, private equity, and the financing of entrepreneurship. New York: Wiley.

  • Leyden, D.P., & Link, A.N. (2013). Collective entrepreneurship: The strategic management of Research Triangle Park. In D. B. Audretsch & M. L. Walshok (Eds.), Creating competitiveness (pp. 176–185). London: Edward Elgar.

  • Lichtenstein, B. B., Carter, N. M., Dooley, K. J., & Gartner, W. B. (2007). Complexity dynamics of nascent entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(2), 236–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N., & Link, J. R. (2007). Government as entrepreneur. New York: Oxford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N., & Ruhm, C. J. (2013). Fathers’ patenting behavior and the propensity of offspring to patent: An intergenerational analysis. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(3), 332–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. (1978). On the size distribution of business firms. Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 508–523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacMillan, I. C., & Katz, J. A. (1992). Idiosyncratic milieus of entrepreneurship research: The need for comprehensive theories. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markman, G. D., & Gartner, W. B. (2002). Is extraordinary growth profitable? A study of Inc. 500 high-growth companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(1), 65–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, C., Van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Wennekers, S. (2007). The relationship between economic development and business ownership revisited. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19(3), 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, N.J.: D. Van Nostrand.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvie, A., & Wiklund, J. (2010). Advancing firm growth research: A focus on growth mode instead of growth rate. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 261–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMullen, J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2006). Encouraging consensus-challenging research in universities. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1643–1669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T. L., Grimes, M. G., McMullen, J. S., & Vogus, T. J. (2012). Venturing for others with heart and head: How compassion encourages social entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 37(4), 616–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minniti, M., & Nardone, C. (2007). Being in someone else’s shoes: The role of gender in nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28(2–3), 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Schindehutte, M. (2012). Framing the entrepreneurial experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(1), 11–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naffziger, D. W., Hornsby, J. S., & Kuratko, D. F. (1994). A proposed research model of entrepreneurial motivation. Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, 18, 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okhuysen, G., & Bonardi, J. P. (2011). The challenges of building theory by combining lenses. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. New York: Cambridge Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. C., & van Praag, C. M. (2012). The entrepreneur’s mode of entry: Business takeover or new venture start? Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 31–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P., & Miller, B. (1992). New firm gestation: Conception, birth, and implications for Research. Journal of Business Venturing, 7(5), 405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, H., & Birkinshaw, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship Safari: A phenomenon-driven search for meaning. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 3(3), 205–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, V., Carneiro, A., & Varum, C. A. (2015). Entry and exit dynamics of nascent business owners. Small Business Economics,. doi:10.1007/s11187-015-9641-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruef, M., Aldrich, H. E., & Carter, N. M. (2003). The structure of organizational founding teams: Homophily, strong ties, and isolation among U.S. entrepreneurs. American Sociological Review, 68(2), 195–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S., Nicholas, D., Ramakrishna, V., & Venkataraman, S. (2003). Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 77–98). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S. A. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11, 448–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, D. A. (2011). Multilevel entrepreneurship research: Opportunities for studying entrepreneurial decision making. Journal of Management, 37(2), 412–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, H., & Jarillo, J. (1990). A Paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, T. E., & Sorenson, O. (2003). Liquidity events and the geographic distribution of entrepreneurial activity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2), 175–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svaleryd, H. (2015). Self-employment and the local business cycle. Small Business Economics, 44(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of State. (2014) Remarks by John Kerry at Global Entrepreneurship Summit. http://www.state.gov/r/pa/pl/232651.htm. Accessed 20 Dec 2014.

  • Venkataraman, S. (1997). The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. In J. Katz & J. Brockhaus (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (Vol. 3, pp. 119–138). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund, J., Davidsson, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Karlsson, C. (2011). The future of Entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2011). Global entrepreneurship and the successful growth strategies of early-stage companies: A world economic forum report. New York: World Economic Forum.

  • Zahra, S. (2007). Contextualizing theory building in entrepreneurship research. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(3), 443–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A. (2015). Corporate entrepreneurship as knowledge creation and conversion: The role of entrepreneurial hubs. Small Business Economics, 44(4), 727–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S., Sapienza, H., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeelenberg, M. (1999). Anticipated regret, expected feedback and behavioral decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 12, 93–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeelenberg, M., van Dijk, E., van den Bos, K., & Pieters, R. (2002). The inaction effect in the psychology of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 314–328.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Kelley School of Business, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA

    David B. Audretsch & Donald F. Kuratko

  2. Bryan School of Business and Economics, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC, 27402, USA

    Albert N. Link

Authors
  1. David B. Audretsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Donald F. Kuratko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Albert N. Link
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David B. Audretsch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Audretsch, D.B., Kuratko, D.F. & Link, A.N. Making sense of the elusive paradigm of entrepreneurship. Small Bus Econ 45, 703–712 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9663-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-015-9663-z

Keywords

JEL Classifications

Search

Navigation