Bank loan terms and conditions for Eurozone SMEs
- Konstantinos Drakos
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The evolution of bank loan price and non-price terms and conditions (T&Cs) for the 2009–2011 period are investigated using firm-level survey data for a sample of Eurozone small and medium-sized enterprises. The raw firm responses, which are of a discrete nature denoting tightening or easing of the T&Cs, or no change at all, are modeled by a bivariate ordered probit model. According to the results obtained, there are sizeable differences between countries, with the protagonists of the sovereign debt crisis (Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain) exhibiting predicted probabilities of tightening that are considerably above the Eurozone average. In addition, price T&Cs exhibit a substantial tightening over time. Finally, firms’ net interest expenses and profitability emerge as important determinants in explaining the cross-sectional variation in bank loan T&Cs that they face.
- Audretsch, D., & Elston, J. (2002). Does firm size matters?: Evidence on the impact of liquidity constraints on firm investment. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 20, 1–16. CrossRef
- Berger, A., Klapper, L., & Udell, G. (2001). The ability of banks to lend to informationally opaque small businesses. Journal of Banking and Finance, 25, 2127–2167. CrossRef
- Berger, A., & Udell, G. (1990). Collateral, loan quality, and bank risk. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 8, 839–856.
- Berger, A., & Udell, G. (1995). Relationship lending and lines of credit in small business finance. Journal of Business, 68(3), 351–381. CrossRef
- Berlin, M., & Loeys, J. (1988). Bond covenants and delegated monitoring. Journal of Finance, 43(2), 397–412. CrossRef
- Berlin, M., & Mester, L. (1992). Debt covenants and renegotiation. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 2, 95–133. CrossRef
- Boocock, G., & Woods, M. (1997). The evaluation criteria used by venture capitalists: Evidence from a UK venture fund. International Small Business Journal, 16, 36–57. CrossRef
- Brick, I., & Palia, D. (2007). Evidence of jointness in the terms of relationship lending. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16, 452–476. CrossRef
- Chamberlain, G. (1984). Panel data. In S. Griliches & M. Intriligator (Eds.), Handbook of econometrics (pp. 1247–1318). Amsterdam: North Holland.
- Cressy, R. (1996). Are business startups credit rationed? Economic Journal, 106, 1253–1270. CrossRef
- Cressy, R., & Toivanen, O. (2001). Is there adverse selection in the credit market? Venture Capital, 3(3), 215–238. CrossRef
- Diamond, D. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. Review of Economic Studies, 51, 393–414. CrossRef
- Diamond, D. (1991). Monitoring and reputation: The choice between bank loans and directly placed debt. Journal of Political Economy, 99, 688–721.
- Eurostat Pocketbooks. (2011). Key figures on European business with a special feature on SMEs. Eurostat, Luxembourg
- Gertler, M., & Gilchrist, S. (1994). Monetary policy, business cycles and the behavior of small manufacturing firms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109, 309–340. CrossRef
- Gilchrist, S., & Himmelberg, D. (1995). Evidence on the role of cash flow for investment. Journal of Monetary Economics, 36, 541–572. CrossRef
- Hu, X., & Schiantarelli, F. (1994). Investment and financing constraints: A switching regression approach using US firm panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 466–479. CrossRef
- Jensen, J., & McGuckin, R. (1997). Firm performance and evolution: Empirical regularities in the US microdata. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6, 25–47. CrossRef
- Merton, R. (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest rates. Journal of Finance, 29(2), 449–470.
- Mundlack, Y. (1978). On the pooling of time series and cross-section data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69–85. CrossRef
- Oliner, S., & Rudebusch, G. (1992). Sources of the financing hierarchy for business investment. Review of Economics and Statistics, 74(2), 643–654. CrossRef
- Petersen, M., & Rajan, R. (1994). The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. Journal of Finance, 49, 3–37. CrossRef
- Posey, R., & Reichert, A. (2011). Terms of lending for small business lines of credit: The role of loan guarantees. International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 5(1), 91–102.
- Sajaia, Z. (2008). Maximum likelihood estimation of a bivariate ordered probit model: Implementation and Monte Carlo simulations. The Stata Journal, 2,1–18.
- Strahan, P. (1999). “Borrower risk and the price and nonprice terms of bank loans”, Staff Report 90. New York: Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
- Vijverberg, C. (2004). An empirical financial accelerator model: Small firms’ investment and credit rationing. Journal of Macroeconomics, 26, 101–129. CrossRef
- Watanabe, W. (2005). How are loans by their main bank priced? Bank effects, information and non-price terms of contract. The Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) Discussion Paper Series 05-E-028. RIETI, Tokyo. Available at: http://www.rieti.go.jp/en
- Bank loan terms and conditions for Eurozone SMEs
Small Business Economics
Volume 41, Issue 3 , pp 717-732
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Bank loan
- Bivariate ordered probit
- Terms and conditions
- Small and medium enterprises
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Accounting and Finance, Athens University of Economics and Business, 76 Patission Street, 10434, Athens, Greece