Optimality, bidirectionality & the evolution of binding phenomena
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Mattausch, J. Research Language Computation (2007) 5: 103. doi:10.1007/s11168-006-9018-7
- 20 Downloads
This paper argues for a frequentist/functionalist account of certain universal patterns of binding phenomena and strategies of reflexive marking. I will claim that the supposed effects of Principles A & B (Chomsky, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 1–46 1980; Reinhart and Reuland, Linguistic Inquiry 24,657–720 1993; et al.) can be treated as epiphenomena which emerge as a result of the complicit pressure of basic economy considerations and statistical asymmetries in language use. The account is spelled out explicitly in a stochastic version of bidirectional Optimality Theory and a novel type of constraint is proposed that enables a grammar to reflect statistical states of affairs in learning data. This approach in turn lends itself to an evolutionary story involving iterated, bidirectional learning.