Ambiguity attitudes and social interactions: An experimental investigation
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This paper reports the results of experiments testing prevalence of non-neutral ambiguity attitudes and how these attitudes change as a result of interpersonal interactions. To address the first question we conducted experiments involving individual choice between betting on ambiguous and unambiguous events of the subject’s choice. We found that a large majority of subjects display ambiguity neutral attitudes, many others display ambiguity incoherent attitudes, and few subjects display either ambiguity-averse attitudes or ambiguity-seeking attitudes. To address the second question we designed a new experiment with a built-in incentive to persuade. We found that interpersonal interactions without incentives to persuade have no effect on behavior. However, when incentives were introduced, the ambiguity neutral subjects were better able to persuade ambiguity seeking and ambiguity incoherent subjects to adopt ambiguity neutral choice behavior and, to a lesser extent, also ambiguity averse subjects.
- Ahn, D., Syngjoo, C., Gale, D., Kariv, S. (2011). Estimating ambiguity aversion in a portfolio choice experiment. Working paper.
- Abdellaoui, M., Baillon, A., Placido, L., Wakker, P.P. (2011). The rich domain of uncertainty: source functions and their experimental implementation. American Economic Review, 101(2), 695–723. CrossRef
- Akay, A., Martinsson, P., Medhin, H., Trautmann, S.T. (2011). Attitudes toward uncertainty among the poor: an experiment in rural Ethiopia. Theory and Decision (forthcoming).
- Becker, S., & Brownson, F. (1964). What price ambiguity? Or the role of ambiguity in decision making. Journal of Political Economy, 74, 801–802.
- Binmore, K., Stewart, L., Voorhoeve, A. (2012). An experiment on the Ellsberg paradox. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 45, 215–238. CrossRef
- Bossaerts, P., Ghirardato, P., Guarnaschelli, S., Zame, W. (2010). Ambiguity in asset markets: theory and experiment. Review of Financial Studies, 23, 1325–1359. CrossRef
- Camerer, C., & Weber, M. (1992). Recent development in modeling preferences: uncertainty and ambiguity. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 325–370. CrossRef
- Charness, G., & Gneezy, U. (2010). Portfolio choice and risk attitudes. Economic Inquiry, 48, 133–146. CrossRef
- Charness, G., Karni, E., Levin, D. (2007). Individual and group decision making under risk: an experimental study of Bayesian updating and violations of first-order stochastic dominance. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 35, 129–148. CrossRef
- Charness, G., Karni, E., Levin, D. (2010). On the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment: new experimental evidence regarding Linda. Games and Economic Behavior, 68, 551–556. CrossRef
- Chew, S.H., Ebstein, R.P., Zhong, S. (2012). Ambiguity aversion and familiarity bias: evidence from behavioral and gene association studies. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 44, 1–18. CrossRef
- Chow, C.C., & Sarin, R.K. (2001). Comparative ignorance and the Ellsberg paradox. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 22, 129–139. CrossRef
- Cooper, D.J., & Kagel, J.H. (2005). Are two heads better than one? Team versus individual play in signaling games. American Economic Review, 95, 477–509. CrossRef
- Ellsberg, D. (1961). Risk, ambiguity and the savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75, 643–669. CrossRef
- Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J., Moore, B. (2001). Some doubts about measuring self-interest using dictator experiments: the costs of anonymity. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 46, 271–290. CrossRef
- Fox, C.R., & Tversky, A. (1995). Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 585–603. CrossRef
- Gerther, D.M., & Plott, C.R. (1979). Economic theory of choice and the revealed preference phenomenon. American Economic Review, 69, 623–638.
- Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1989). Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18, 141–153. CrossRef
- Greiner, B. (2004). An online recruitment system for economic experiments. In K. Kremer, & V. Macho (Eds.), (Hrsg.): Forschung und wissenschaftliches Rechnen, GWDG Bericht (Vol. 63, pp. 79–93). Göttingen: Ges. für Wiss. Datenverarbeitung.
- Halevy, Y. (2007). Ellsberg revisited: an experimental study. Econometrica, 75, 503–506. CrossRef
- Hsu, M., Bhatt, M., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Camerer, C. (2005). Neural systems responding to degrees of uncertainty in human decision-making. Science, 310(5754), 1680–1683. CrossRef
- Keck, S., Diecidue, E., Budescu, D. (2011). Group decision making under ambiguity. Working paper.
- Keller, R.L., Sarin, R.K., Sounderpadian, S.J. (2009). An examination of ambiguity aversion: are two heads better than one? Judgement and Decision Making, 2, 390–397.
- Klibanoff, P., Marinacci, M., Sujoy, M. (2005). A smooth model of decision making under ambiguity. Econometrica, 73, 1849–1892. CrossRef
- Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversal of preferences between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 46–55. CrossRef
- Liu, H.H., & Colman, A.M. (2009). Ambiguity aversion in the long run: repeated decision making under risk and uncertainty. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30, 277–284. CrossRef
- MacCrimmon, K.R. (1968). Descriptive and normative implications of the decision-theory postulates. In K. Borch, & J. Mossin (Eds.), Risk and uncertainty. London: MacMillan.
- MacCrimmon, K.R., & Larsson, S. (1979). Utility theory: Axioms versus paradoxes. In M. Allais, & O. Hagen (Eds.), Expected utility and the Allais paradox (pp. 333–409). Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel. CrossRef
- Schmeidler, D. (1989). Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity. Econometrica, 57, 571–588. CrossRef
- Seo, K. (2009). Ambiguity and second order beliefs. Econometrica, 77(5), 1575–1605. CrossRef
- Trautmann, S.T., Vieider, F.M., Wakker, P.P. (2011). Preference reversals for ambiguity aversion. Management Science, 57, 1320–1333. CrossRef
- Wakker, P.P. (2010). Prospect theory: for risk and ambiguity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Ambiguity attitudes and social interactions: An experimental investigation
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Volume 46, Issue 1 , pp 1-25
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Ambiguity aversion
- Ambiguity attitudes
- Ellsberg paradox
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Economics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-9210, USA
- 2. Department of Economics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA
- 3. Department of Economics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 4321, USA