Policymaking for posterity
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Policymaking for posterity involves current decisions with distant consequences. Contrary to conventional prescriptions, we conclude that the greater wealth of future generations may strengthen the case for preserving environmental amenities; lower discount rates should be applied to the far future, and special effort should be made to avoid actions that impose costs on future generations. Posterity brings great uncertainties. Even massive losses, such as human extinction, however, do not merit infinite negative utility. Given learning, greater uncertainties about damages could increase or decrease the optimal level of current mitigation activities. Policies for posterity should anticipate effects on: alternative investments, both public and private; the actions of other nations; and the behaviors of future generations. Such effects may surprise. This analysis blends traditional public finance and behavioral economics with a number of hypothetical choice problems.
- Arrow, K. Discounting, morality, and gaming. In: Portney, P. R., Weyant, J. P. eds. (1999) Discounting and intergenerational equity. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
- Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., Leamer, E. E., Radner, R., Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation.” http://www.darrp.noaa.gov/library/pdf/cvblue.pdf.
- Cowen, T. (2008). Social discount rate. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics Online, 2nd ed.
- Cropper, M., Aydede, S. K., Portney, P. R. (1994) Preferences for life saving programs: How the public discounts time and age. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 8: pp. 243-246 CrossRef
- Feldstein, M. (1964) The social time preference discount rate in cost benefit analysis. Economic Journal 74: pp. 360-379 CrossRef
- Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of double effect. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15. Reprinted in Bonnie Steinbock and Alastair Norcross, eds. Killing and letting die, 2nd ed. (New York: Fordham University Press, 1994), pp. 266–279.
- Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T. (2002) Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature 40: pp. 351-401 CrossRef
- Gollier, C. (2008). Discounting with fat-tailed economic growth. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 37 (2/3).
- Gollier, C., Treich, N. (2003) Decision-making under scientific uncertainty: The economics of the precautionary principle. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 27: pp. 77-103 CrossRef
- Gollier, C., Jullien, B., Treich, N. (2000) Scientific progress and irreversibility: An economic interpretation of the ‘precautionary principle’. Journal of Public Economics 75: pp. 229-253 CrossRef
- Kahneman, D., Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: pp. 263-291 CrossRef
- Lichtenstein, S., Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Layman, M., Combs, B. (1978) Judged frequency of lethal events. Journal of Experimental Psychology 4: pp. 551-578
- Nordhaus, W. D. (2007) A review of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature 45: pp. 686-702 CrossRef
- Phelps, E. S., Pollak, R. (1968) On second-best national saving and game—Equilibrium growth. Review of Economic Studies 35: pp. 185-199 CrossRef
- Portney, P.R., and Weyant, J.P. (Eds.) (1999). Discounting and intergenerational equity. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
- Schelling, T. (1957) Bargaining, communication, and limited war. Conflict Resolution 1: pp. 19-36 CrossRef
- Stern, N. (2007) The economics of climate change: The Stern Review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
- Thaler, R. H., & Benartzi, S. (2001). “Save more tomorrow: Using behavioral economics to increase employee saving.” http://faculty.chicagogsb.edu/richard.thaler/research/SMarT14.pdf.
- Thomson, J. J. (1985) The trolley problem. Yale Law Journal 94: pp. 1395-1415 CrossRef
- Weitzman, M. L. Just keep discounting, but…. In: Portney, P. R., Weyant, J. P. eds. (1999) Discounting and intergenerational equity. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC
- Weitzman, M. L. (2007) A review of the Stern Review on the economics of climate change. Journal of Economic Literature 45: pp. 703-724 CrossRef
- Weitzman, M. L. (2008) Some dynamic economic consequences of the sensitivity inference dilemma. Harvard University, Mimeo
- Weitzman, M. L. (2008) On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Harvard University, Mimeo
- Wigley, T. M. L. (2006). A combined mitigation/geoengineering approach to climate stabilization. Science (314), 20 October 2006, 452–454.
- Zeckhauser, R., & Fels, S. (1968). Discounting for proximity with perfect and total altruism. Discussion Paper Number 50, Harvard Institute of Economic Research.
- Policymaking for posterity
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Volume 37, Issue 2-3 , pp 115-140
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Comet problem
- Trolley problem
- Climate change
- Global warming
- Reaction function
- Industry Sectors