Disappointment without prior expectation: a unifying perspective on decision under risk
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The central idea of Disappointment theory is that an individual forms an expectation about a risky alternative, and may experience disappointment if the outcome eventually obtained falls short of the expectation. We abandon the hypothesis of a well-defined prior expectation: disappointment feelings may arise from comparing the outcome received with anyof the gamble’s outcomes that the individual failed to get. This leads to a new, general form of Disappointment model. It encompasses Rank Dependent Utility with an explicit one-parameter probability transformation, and Risk-Value models with a generic risk measure including Variance, providing a unifying behavioral foundation for these models.
- Abdellaoui, Mohammed (2000). “Parameter-Free Elicitation of Utility and Probability Weighting Functions,” Management Science 46, 1497–1512. CrossRef
- Bell, David (1983). “Risk Premiums for Decision Regret,” Management Science 29(10), 1156–1166. CrossRef
- Bell, David (1985). “Disappointment in Decision Making under Uncertainty,” Operations Research 33, 1–27.
- Bleichrodt, Han and José Luis Pinto (2000). “A Parameter-Free Elicitation of the Probability Weighting Function in Medical Decision Analysis,” Management Science 46, 1485–1496. CrossRef
- Delquié, Philippe and Alessandra Cillo (2006). “Expectations, Disappointment, and Rank-Dependent Probability Weighting,” Theory and Decision 60(2–3), 193–206. CrossRef
- Diecidue, Enrico and Peter Wakker (2001). “On the Intuition of Rank-Dependent Utility,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 23, 281–298. CrossRef
- Gul, Faruk (1991). “A Theory of Disappointment Aversion,” Econometrica 59, 667–686. CrossRef
- Jia, Jianmin and James S. Dyer (1996). “A Standard Measure of Risk and Risk-Value Models,” Management Science 45, 519–532.
- Jia, Jianmin, Dyer, James S., and John C. Butler (2001). “Generalized Disappointment Models,”Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 22(1), 59–78.
- Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica 47, 263–291. CrossRef
- Loomes, Graham and Robert Sugden (1986). “Disappointment and Dynamic Consistency in Choice under Uncertainty,” Review of Economic Studies 53, 271–282. CrossRef
- Machina, Mark J (1982). “Expected Utility Analysis Without the Independence Axiom,” Econometrica 50, 277–323. CrossRef
- Mellers, Barbara A., Alan Schwartz, Katty Ho, and Ilana Ritov (1997). “Decision Affect Theory: Emotional Reactions to the Outcomes of Risky Options,” Psychological Science 8(6), 423–429. CrossRef
- Ordóñez, Lisa D., Connolly, Terry, and Richard Coughlan (2000). “Multiple Reference Points in Satisfaction and Fairness Assessment,” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 13(3), 329–344. CrossRef
- Quiggin, John (1982). “A Theory of Anticipated Utility,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 3, 323–343. CrossRef
- Tversky, Amos and Daniel Kahneman (1992). “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5, 297–323. CrossRef
- van Dijk, Wilco W., and Marcel Zeelenberg (2002). “What Do We Talk about When We Talk about Disappointment? Distinguishing Outcome-Related Disappointment from Person-Related Disappointment,” Cognition and Emotion 16(6), 787–807. CrossRef
- Wu, George and Richard Gonzalez (1996). “Curvature of the Probability Weighting Function,” Management Science 42, 1677–1690.
- Disappointment without prior expectation: a unifying perspective on decision under risk
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty
Volume 33, Issue 3 , pp 197-215
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Kluwer Academic Publishers
- Additional Links
- Disappointment theory
- Rank Dependent utility
- Risk-value models
- Expected Utility violations
- Industry Sectors