Aczél, J. (1966). *Lectures on Functional Equations and their Applications.* New York: Academic Press.

Aczél, J. (1987). *A Short Course on Functional Equations Based on Applications to the Behavioral and Social Sciences* Dordrecht-Boston-Lancaster-Tokyo: Reidel-Kluwer.

Aczél, J. and M. Kuczma. (1991). “Generalizations of a ‘Folk-Theorem’ on Simple Functional Equations in a Single Variable,” *Results in Mathematics* 19, 5–21.

Aczél, J., R.D. Luce, and A.A.J. Marley. (2003). “A Functional Equation Arising from Simultaneous Utility Representations,” *Results Math.* 43, 193–197.

Anscombe, F.J. and R.J. Aumann. (1963). “A Definition of Subjective Probability,” *Annals Math. Stat.* 34, 199–205.

Birnbaum, M.H. (1997). “Violations of Monotonicity in Judgment and Decision Making.” In A.A.J. Marley (ed.). *Choice, Decision, and Measurement: Essays in Honor of R. Duncan Luce*. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 73–100.

Birnbaum, M.H. (1999). “Paradoxes of Allais, Stochastic Dominance, and Decision Weights.” In J. Shanteau, B. A. Mellers, and D.A. Schum (eds.), *Decision Science and Technology: Reflections on the Contributions of Ward Edwards*. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 27–52.

Birnbaum, M.H. (2000). “Decision Making in the Lab and on the Web.” In M. H. Birnbaum (ed.). *Psychological Experiments on the Internet*. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 3–34.

Birnbaum, M.H. (2004). “Tests of Rank-Dependent Utility and Cumulative Prospect Theory in Gambles Represented by Natural Frequencies: Effects of Format, Event Framing, and Branch Splitting,”*Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes* 95, 40–65.

Birnbaum, M.H. and D. Beeghley. (1997). “Violations of Branch Independence in Judgments of the Value of Gambles,” *Psychological Science* 8, 87–94.

Birnbaum, M.H. and A. Chavez. (1997). “Tests of Theories of Decision Making: Violations of Branch Independence and Distribution Independence,” *Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes* 71, 161–194.

Birnbaum, M.H., G. Coffey, B.A. Mellers, and R. Weiss. (1992). “Utility Measurement: Configural-Weight Theory and the Judge’s Point of View,” *Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance* 18, 331–346.

Birnbaum, M.H., and J. Navarrete. (1998). “Testing Descriptive Utility Theories: Violations of Stochastic Dominance and Cumulative Independence,” *Journal of Risk and Uncertainty* 17, 49–78.

Casadesus-Masanell, R., P. Klibanoff, and E. Ozdenoren. (2000). “Maxmin Expected Utility over Savage Acts with a Set of Priors,” *J. Econ. Theory* 92, 35–65.

Chew, S.H. (1983). “A Generalization of the Quasilinear Mean and Applications to the Measurement of Income Inequality and Decision Theory Resolving the Allais Paradox,” *Econometrica* 51, 1065–1092.

Cho, Y.-H., R.D. Luce, and L. Truong. (2002). “Duplex Decomposition and General Segregation of Lotteries of a Gain and a Loss: An Empirical Evaluation,” *Org. Beh. Hum. Dec. Making* 89, 1176–1193.

Choquet, G. (1953). “Theory of Capacities,” *Annales Inst. Fourier* 5, 131–295.

Ellsberg, D. (1961). “Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms,” *Q. J. Econ*. 75, 643–669.

Fishburn, P.C. (1988). *Nonlinear Preference and Utility Theory*. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press.

Ghirardato, P. and M. Marinacci. (2002). “Ambiguity Made Precise: A Comparative Foundation,” *J. Econ. Theory* 102, 251–289.

Ghirardato, P., F. Maccheroni, M. Marinacci, and M. Siniscalchi. (2003). “A Subjective Spin on Roulette Wheels,” *Econometrica* 71, 1897–1908.

Gilboa, I., and D. Schmeidler. (1989). “Maxmin Expected Utility with a Non-Unique Prior,” *J. Math. Econ.* 18, 141–153.

Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky. (1979). “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Making Under Risk,” *Econometrica* 47, 263–291.

Karmarkar, U.S. (1978). “Subjectively Weighted Utility: A Descriptive Extension of the Expected Utility Model,” *Org. Beh. Human Performance* 21, 61–72.

Köbberling, V. and P.P. Wakker. (2003). “Preference Foundations for Nonexpected Utility: A Generalized and Simplified Technique,” *Math. Op. Res.* 28, 395–423.

Krantz, D. H., R.D. Luce, P. Suppes, and A. Tversky. (1971). *Foundations of Measurement*, Vol. I. San Diego: Academic Press.

Liu, L. (1995). *A Theory of Coarse Utility and its Application to Portfolio Analysis*. University of Kansas, Ph.D. dissertation.

Luce, R.D. (1959). *Individual Choice Behavior: A Theoretical Analysis*. New York: Wiley.

Luce, R.D. (1990). “Rational versus Plausible Accounting Equivalences in Preference Judgments,” *Psychol. Sci.* 1, 225–234.

Luce, R.D. (1998). “Coalescing, Event Commutativity, and Theories of Utility,” *J. Risk Uncert.* 16, 87–114. Errata: 18, 1999, 99.

Luce, R.D. (2000).

*Utility of Gains and Losses: Measurement-Theoretical and Experimental Approaches*. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, Errata: see Luce’s web page at

http://www.socsci.uci.eduLuce, R.D. (2002). “A Psychophysical Theory of Intensity Proportions, Joint Presentations, and Matches,” *Psych. Rev.* 109, 520–532.

Luce, R.D. (2003). “Increasing Increment Generalizations of Rank-Dependent Theories,” *Theory Dec.* 55, 87–146.

Luce, R.D. (2004). “Symmetric and Asymmetric Matching of Joint Presentations,” *Psych. Rev.* 111, 446–454.

Luce, R.D. and A.A.J. Marley. (2000). “Elements of Chance,” *Theory Dec.* 49, 97–126.

Maksa, G. (1999). “Solution of Generalized Bisymmetry Type Equations Without Surjectivity Assumptions,” *Aequationes Math.* 57, 50–74.

Marley, A.A.J. and R.D. Luce. (2001). “Ranked-Weighted Utility and Qualitative Convolution,” *J. Risk Uncert.* 23, 135–163.

Marley, A.A.J. and R.D. Luce. (2004). “Independence Properties vis-à-vis Several Utility Representations,” submitted.

Meginniss, J.R. (1976). “A New Class of Symmetric Utility Rules for Gambles, Subjective Marginal Probability Functions, and a Generalized Bayes’ Rule,” *Proceedings American Statistical Association, Business and Economic Statistics Sec.* 471–476.

Ng, C.T. (2003). “Monotonic Solutions of Functional Equation Arising from Simultaneous Utility Representations,”*Results in Mathematics* 44, 340–361.

Quiggin, J. (1982). “ A Theory of Anticipated Utility,” *J. Econ. Beh. Org.* 3, 323–343.

Quiggin, J. (1993). *Generalized Expected Utility Theory: The Rank-Dependent Model.* Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Savage, L.J. (1954). *The Foundations of Statistics.* New York: Wiley.

Schmeidler, D. (1989). “Subjective Probability and Expected Utility Without Additivity,” *Econometrica* 57, 571–587.

Slovic, P., M. Finucane, E. Peters, and D.G. MacGregor. (2002). “The Affect Heuristic.” In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, and D. Kahneman (eds.), *Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment.* New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 397–420.

Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman. (1992). “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,” *J. Risk Uncert*. 5, 297–323.

von Neumann, J. and O.Morgenstern. (1947). *Theory of Games and Economic Behavior*, 2nd edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Wakker, P. P. (1990). “Under Stochastic Dominance Choquet-Expected Utility and Anticipated Utility are Identical,” *Theory and Decision* 119–132.

Wakker, P.P. (1991). “Additive Representations on Rank-Ordered Sets. I. The Algebraic Approach,” *J. Math. Psych.* 35, 501–531.

Wang, T. (2003). “Conditional Preferences and Updating,” *J. Econ. Theory* 108, 286–321.