Abd-El-Khalick, F., BouJaoude, S., Duschl, R., Lederman, N. G., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hofstein, A., Niaz, M., Treagust, D., & Tuan, H-l. (2004). Inquiry in science education: international perspectives. Science Education, 88
(3), 397–419. doi:10.1002/sce.10118
Akkus, R., Gunel, M., & Hand, B. (2007). Comparing an inquiry-based approach known as the science writing heuristic to traditional science teaching practices: are there differences? International Journal of Science Education, 29
Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: what research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13
(1), 1–12. doi:10.1023/a:1015171124982
Archambault, L. M. (2011). The Practitioner’s Perspective on Teacher Education: Preparing for the K-12 Online Classroom. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 19(1), 73–91.
Archambault, L. M. & Crippen, K. J. (2009). K-12 Distance Educators at Work: Who’s Teaching Online Across the United States. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(4), 363–391.
Arzi, H. J. (2003). Enhancing science education though laboratory environments: More than walls, benches, and widgets. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (Vol. I, pp. 595–608). Boston: Kluwer.
Blanchard, M. R., Southerland, S. A., Osborne, J. W., Sampson, V. D., Annetta, L. A., & Granger, E. M. (2010). Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction. Science Education, 94
(4), 577–616. doi:10.1002/sce.20390
Braun, H., Coley, R., Yue, J., & Trapani, C. (2009). Exploring what works in science instruction: A look at the eighth-grade science classroom (pp. 46): Educational Testing Service.
Clark, T. (2001). Virtual schools: Trends and issues. Phoenix: WestEd/Distance Learning Resource Network.
Clark, D. B., Touchman, S., Martinez-Garza, M., Ramirez-Marin, F., & Skjerping Drews, T. (2012). Bilingual language supports in online science inquiry environments. Computers & Education, 58
(4), 1207–1224. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.019
Cohen, A., & Scardamalia, M. (1998). Discourse about ideas: monitoring and regulation in face-to-face and computer-mediated environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 6
Combs, A. W. (1982). Affective education or none at all. Educational Leadership, 39(7), 494–497.
Corter, J. E., Nickerson, J. V., Esche, S. K., Chassapis, C., Im, S., & Ma, J. (2007). Constructing reality: a study of remote, hands-on, and simulated laboratories. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 14(2).
Corter, J. E., Esche, S. K., Chassapis, C., Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2011). Process and learning outcomes from remotely-operated, simulated, and hands-on student laboratories. Computers & Education, 57
(3), 2054–2067. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.009
Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44
(4), 613–642. doi:10.1002/tea.20157
Dalgarno, B., Bishop, A. G., Adlong, W., & Bedgood, D. R., Jr. (2009). Effectiveness of a virtual laboratory as a preparatory resource for distance education chemistry students. Computers & Education, 53
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34
Dawley, L., Rice, K. & Hinck, G. (2010). Going Virtual! 2010: The status of professional development and unique needs of K-12 online teachers. White paper prepared for the North American Council for Online Learning. Washington, D.C.
DeBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Dede, C., Ketelhut, D. J., Whitehouse, P., Breit, L., & McCloskey, E. M. (2009). A research agenda for online teacher professional development. Journal of Teacher Education, 60
Dillman, D. A. (2007). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley.
Donovan, S. M., & Bransford, J. D. (2005). How students learn: Science in the classroom. Washington: National Academies Press.
Duschl, R. A., & Grandy, R. E. (2005, February). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Framing the debates. Paper presented at the Inquiry Conference on Developing a Consensus Research Agenda, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ.
Edelson, D. C., & Reiser, B. J. (2006). Making authentic practices accessible to learners. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 335–354). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Finkelstein, N. D., Adams, W. K., Keller, C. J., Kohl, P. B., Perkins, K. K., Podolefsky, N. S., Reid, S., & LeMaster, R. (2005). When learning about the real world is better done virtually: a study of substituting computer simulations for laboratory equipment. Physical Review Special Topics—Physics Education Research, 1
Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (1996). Practical work: its role in the understanding of evidence in science. International Journal of Science Education, 18
Hall, J. K., & Walsh, M. (2002). Teacher-student interaction and language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22
Hilbert, M., & Lopez, P. (2011). The world’s technological capacity to store, communicate, and compute information. Science, 332
Hodson, D. (1996). Practical work in school science: Exploring some directions for change. International Journal of Science Education, 18
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (1982). The role of the laboratory in science teaching: neglected aspects of research. Review of Educational Research, 52
Hofstein, A., & Lunetta, V. N. (2004). The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Science Education, 88
IAP. (2003). IAP statement on science education.
Retrieved 4/2, 2012, from http://www.interacademies.net/10878/13923.aspx
Jara, C. A., Candelas, F. A., Torres, F., Dormido, S., Esquembre, F., & Reinoso, O. (2009). Real-time collaboration of virtual laboratories through the Internet. Computers & Education, 52
(1), 126–140. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.007
Jeschofnig, L., & Jeschofnig, P. (2011). Teaching lab science online: Resources for best practices, tools, and technology: Jossey-Bass.
Jona, K., Adsit, J., & Powell, A. (2008). Goals, guidelines, and standards for student scientific investigations: North American council for online learning.
Kang, N.-H., & Wallace, C. S. (2005). Secondary science teachers’ use of laboratory activities: linking epistemological beliefs, goals, and practices. Science Education, 89
(1), 140–165. doi:10.1002/sce.20013
Kennedy, K. & Archambault, L. M. (2012). Offering Pre-service Teachers Field Experiences in K-12 Online Learning: A National Survey of Teacher Education Programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(3), 185–200.
Kennedy, K., & Cavanaugh, C. (2010). Development and support of online teachers: the roles of mentors in virtual schools. Journal of Technology Integration in the Classroom, 2(3), 37–42.
Kennepohl, D., & Shaw, L. (Eds.). (2010). Accessible Elements: Teaching Science Online and at a Distance. Athabasca University: AU Press.
Klahr, D., Triona, L. M., & Williams, C. (2007). Hands on what? The relative effectiveness of physical versus virtual materials in an engineering design project by middle school children. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44
Koballa, T. R., & Glynn, S. M. (2006). Attitudinal and Motivational Constructs in Science Learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 75-102): Lawrence Earlbaum.
Laferrière, T., Lamon, M., & Chan, C. K. (2006). Emerging e-trends and models in teacher education and professional development. Teaching Education, 17
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: a conceptual overview. Science Education, 84
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Lindsay, E. D., & Good, M. C. (2005). Effects of laboratory access modes upon learning outcomes. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 48
Lunnetta, V. N., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. P. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Science Education (pp. 393-442): Lawrence Earlbaum.
Ma, J., & Nickerson, J. V. (2006). Hands-on, simulated and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review. ACM Computing Surveys, 38
Manfreda, K. L., Bosnjak, M., Berzelak, J., Hass, I., & Vehovar, V. (2008). Web surveys versus other survey modes: A meta-analysis comparing response rate. International Journal of Market Research, 50(1), 79–104.
Martin, M. O., Mullis, I. V., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). Classroom characteristics and instruction TIMSS 2003 International Science Report (pp. 281–321). Lynch School of Education, Boston College: International Assoication for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Martinez, M. E., & Peters Burton, E. E. (2011). Cognitive affordances of the cyberinfrastructure for science and math learning. Educational Media International, 48
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (2002). The role and character of the nature of science in science education. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The nature of science in science education
(Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Netherlands: Springer.CrossRef
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2009). Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. Washington: US Department of Education.
NRC. (1996). National science education standards. Washington: National Academy Press.
NRC. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington: National Academy Press.
NRC. (2006). America's lab report: Investigations in high school science. Washington: National Academies Press.
NSTA. (2007). The integral role of laboratory investigations in science instruction.
Retrieved 4/2, 2012, from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/laboratory.aspx
Orgill, M. (2007). Phenomenography. In G. M. Bodner & M. Orgill (Eds.), Theoretical frameworks for research in chemistry/science education (pp. 132–151). Upper Saddle River: Pearson.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park: Sage.
Pyatt, K., & Sims, R. (2012). Virtual and physical experimentation in inquiry-based science labs: attitudes, performance and access. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21
(1), 133–147. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9291-6
Queen, B., Lewis, L., & Coopersmith, J. (2001). Distance education courses for public elementary and secondary school students: 2009-10 NCES 2012-008. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statictics.
Rice, K. L. (2006). A comprehensive look at distance education in the K–12 context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 425–448.
Riffell, S., & Sibley, D. (2005). Using web-based instruction to improve large undergraduate biology courses: an evaluation of a hybrid course format. Computers & Education, 44
Roehrig, G. H., & Luft, J. A. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26
Russell, D. W., Lucas, K. B., & McRobbie, C. J. (2004). Role of the microcomputer-based laboratory display in supporting the construction of new understandings in thermal physics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41
Sadler, T. D. (2006). Promoting discourse and argumentation in science teacher education. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17
Schneider, R. M., & Krajcik, J. (2002). Supporting science teacher learning: the role of educative curriculum materials. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 13
(3), 221–245. doi:10.1023/a:1016569117024
Setzer, J. C., & Lewis, L. (2005). Distance education courses for public elementary and secondary school students: 2002-03 NCES 2005-010. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statictics.
Shih, T., & Fan, X. (2008). Comparing response rates from Web and mail surveys: A meta-analysis. Field Methods, 20(3), 249–271.
Shulman, L. S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 134
Simon, S., Erduran, S., & Osborne, J. (2006). Learning to teach argumentation: research and development in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 28
Smith, R., Clark, T., & Blomeyer, R. L. (2005). A synthesis of new research on k-12 online learning. Naperville: Learning Point Associates.
Srinivasan, S., Pérez, L., Palmer, R., Brooks, D., Wilson, K., & Fowler, D. (2006). Reality versus simulation. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 15
Triona, L. M., & Klahr, D. (2003). Point and click or grab and heft: comparing the influence of physical and virtual instructional materials on elementary school students’ ability to design experiments. Cognition and Instruction, 21
van der Meij, J., & de Jong, T. (2006). Supporting students’ learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulation-based learning environment. Learning and Instruction, 16
(3), 199–212. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.007
van Rooij, S. W. (2009). Adopting open-source software applications in U.S. higher education: a cross-disciplinary review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 79
(2), 682–701. doi:10.3102/0034654308325691
Watson, J., & Ryan, J. (2007). Keeping pace with K-12 online learning. Evergreen: Evergreen Consulting Associates.
Watson, J., Murin, A., Vashaw, L., Gemin, B., & Rapp, C. (2011). Keeping pace with K–12 online learning: an annual review of policy and practice. Evergreen: Evergreen Education Group.
Welch, W. W., Klopfer, L. E., Aikenhead, G. S., & Robinson, J. T. (1981). The role of inquiry in science education: analysis and recommendations. Science Education, 65
Zacharia, Z. C. (2007). Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students' conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23
Zacharia, Z. C., & Olympiou, G. (2011). Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning. Learning and Instruction, 21
(3), 317–331. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.001
Zacharia, Z. C., Olympiou, G., & Papaevripidou, M. (2008). Effects of experimenting with physical and virtual manipulatives on students’ conceptual understanding in heat and temperature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45
(9), 1021–1035. doi:10.1002/tea.20260