The Role of Content in Inquiry-Based Elementary Science Lessons: An Analysis of Teacher Beliefs and Enactment
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) Video Study explored instructional practices in the United States (US) in comparison with other countries that ranked higher on the 1999 TIMSS assessment, and revealed that 8th grade science teachers in the US emphasize activities over content during lessons (Roth et al. 2006). This study applies the content framework from the TIMSS Video Study to a sample of 28 3rd grade teachers enacting an inquiry-based unit on floating and sinking, and seeks a deeper understanding of teachers’ practices through analysis of interviews with those teachers. Transcripts of observed lessons were coded according to the TIMSS framework for types of content, and transcripts of teacher interviews were coded to capture the ways in which teachers described their role in and purposes for teaching science, particularly with respect to the floating and sinking unit. Results indicate that teachers focused more on canonical, procedural and experimental knowledge during lessons than on real-world connections and the nature of science; however, none of the types of content received major emphasis in a majority of the classrooms in the sample. During interviews, teachers described their practice in ways that prioritized helping students to like science over specific content outcomes. The study suggests that elementary school teachers’ emphasis on doing and feeling during inquiry-based lessons may interfere with teaching of content.
- Alonzo, A. C. (2002). Effects of a content-based professional development program on elementary school inquiry science instruction. Presentation at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
- Alonzo, A., Hartney, D., Linden, J., Post, L., & Stewart, M. (1997). Floating and sinking: A professional development module for elementary school teachers. Pasadena, CA: California Institute of Technology, Caltech Precollege Science Initiative.
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman and Company.
- Brandwein, P. F. (1962). Elements in a strategy for teaching science in the elementary school. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World, Inc.
- Brown, W. R., & White, E. P. (1978). Delta project cards: Clay boats. Hudson, NH: Delta Education Inc.
- Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Bryan, L. A. (2003). Nestedness of beliefs: Examining a prospective elementary teacher’s belief system about science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 835–868. CrossRef
- Chazan, D., & Ball, D. (1999). Beyond being told not to tell. For the Learning of Mathematics, 19(2), 2–10.
- Cohen, D. K. (1990). A revolution in one classroom: The case of Mrs. Oublier. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 311–329.
- Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14. CrossRef
- deBoer, G. E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Eick, C. J., & Reed, C. J. (2002). What makes an inquiry-oriented science teacher? The influence of learning histories on student teacher role identity and practice. Science Education, 86, 401–416. CrossRef
- Elementary Science Study. (1986). Clay boats teacher’s guide. Hudson, NH: Delta Education, Inc.
- Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38(1), 47–65.
- Flick, L. B., & Lederman, N. G. (eds). (2004). Scientific inquiry and nature of science: Implications teaching, learning, and teacher education. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.
- Furtak, E. M. (2006). The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching. Science Education, 90, 453–467. CrossRef
- Kagan, D. (1992). Implications of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27, 65–90. CrossRef
- King, K., Shumow, L., & Lietz, S. (2001). Science education in an urban elementary school: Case studies of teacher beliefs and classroom practices. Science Education, 85, 89–110. CrossRef
- Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41, 75–86. CrossRef
- Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15, 661–667. CrossRef
- Luft, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2007). Capturing science teachers’ epistemological beliefs: The development of the Teacher Beliefs Interview. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 11(2), 38–63.
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- National Research Council. (2001). Inquiry and the national science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy.
- Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teacher’s beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62, 307–322.
- Pine, J., Aschbacher, P., Roth, E., Jones, M., McPhee, C., Martin, C., et al. (2006). Fifth graders’ science inquiry abilities: A comparative study of students in hands-on and textbook curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 467–484. CrossRef
- Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.), pp. 102–118. New York: MacMillan.
- Roehrig, G. H. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 3–24. CrossRef
- Roth, K. J., Druker, S. L., Garnier, H. E., Lemmens, M., Chen, C., Kawanaka, T., et al. (2006). Teaching science in five countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 Video Study (NCES 2006-011). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
- Schwab, J. J. (1962). The teaching of science as enquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Shulman, L. S., & Tamir, P. (1973). Research on teaching in the natural sciences. In R. M. W. Traver (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching, pp. 1098–1148. Chicago: Rand McNally.
- Smith, J. P. (1996). Efficacy and teaching mathematics by telling: A challenge for reform. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27, 387–402. CrossRef
- Spillane, J. P., & Zeuli, J. S. (1999). Reform and teaching: Exploring patterns of practice in the context of national and state mathematics reforms. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2, 1–27.
- Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1998). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley & Sons.
- Yerrick, R. K., Parke, H., & Nugent, J. (1997). Struggling to promote deeply rooted change: The “filtering effect” of teachers’ beliefs on understanding transformational views of teaching science. Science Education, 81, 137–159. CrossRef
- The Role of Content in Inquiry-Based Elementary Science Lessons: An Analysis of Teacher Beliefs and Enactment
Research in Science Education
Volume 40, Issue 3 , pp 425-449
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- TIMSS video study
- Elementary teachers
- Science education
- Inquiry teaching
- Teacher beliefs
- Elementary school science
- Science teaching
- Educational reform