AAAS [American Association for the Advancement of Science] (1994). Project 2061. Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Akerson, V. L., Morrison, J. A., & McDuffie, A. R. (2006). One course is not enough: Preservice elementary teachers’ retention of improved views of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Alters, B. J. (1997). Whose nature of science? Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Bartholomew, H., Osborne, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2004). Teaching pupils “ideas-about-science”: Five dimensions of effective practice. Science Education
Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education
Cartier, J. L., & Stewart, J. (2000). Teaching the nature of inquiry: Further developments in high school genetics curriculum. Science and Education
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating in inquiry tasks. Science Education
Cropley, A. J. (1999). Definition of creativity. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 511–524). London: Academic.
Darden, L. (1992). Strategies in anomaly resolution. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive models of science (pp. 251–273). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dunbar, K. (1997). How scientists think: on-line creativity and conceptual change in science. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes
(pp. 461–494). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRef
Hmelo-Silver, C., Nagarajan, A., & Day, R. S. (2002). “It’s harder than we thought it would be”: A comparative case study of expert-novice experimentation strategies. Science Education
Hodson, D. (1998). Is this really what scientists do? In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 93–108). London: Routledge.
Lakatos, I. (1994). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In J. Worrall & G. Currie (Eds.), The methodology of scientific research programmes: Philosophical papers (pp. 8–101). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and development of thinking. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Lederman, N. G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, G. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners’ conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Lee, H., & Songer, N. B. (2003). Making authentic science accessible to students. International Journal of Science Education
McComas, W. F. (Ed.). (1998). The nature of science in science education, rationales and strategies. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Meheus, J. (2002). Inconsistency in science. London: Kluwer.
Nersessian, N. (1992). Ho do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. In R. N. Giere (Ed.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science: Vol. 15. Cognitive models of science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
NRC [National Research Council] (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
NSTA [National Science Teachers Association] (2000). NSTA position statement: The nature of science
. Document retrieved: 3/18/03. http://www.nsta.org/159&psid=22
Park, J. (2003). An analysis of the processes of conceptual change through the successive refinement and articulation of students’ conceptual framework—Focused on the university students’ responses. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 23(3), 276–285.
Park, J. (2006). Modelling analysis of students’ processes of generating scientific explanatory hypotheses. International Journal of Science Education
Park, J., & Jang, K. A. e. (2005). Analysis of the actual scientific inquiries of physicists—Focus on research motivation. Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 47(3), 401–408.
Park, J., Kim, I., Kim, M., & Lee, M. (2001a). Analysis of the students’ processes of confirmation and falsification of the hypotheses in electrostatics. International Journal of Science Education
Park, J., Kim, I., Kwon, S., & Song, J. (2001b). An analysis of thought experiments in the history of physics and implications for physics teaching. In R. Pinto & S. Surinach (Eds.), Physics teacher education beyond 2000 (pp. 347–351). Paris: Elsevier.
Peirce, C. S. (1998). The three normative sciences: The fifth lecture on 30 April 1903. In the Peirce Edition Project (Ed.), The essential Peirce: Selected philosophical writings, vol. 2 (1893–1913) (pp. 196–207). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Ritchie, S. M., & Rigano, D. L. (1996). Laboratory apprenticeship through a student research project. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. G., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Education
Tasker R., & Freyberg, P. (1985). Facing the mismatches in the classroom. In R. Osborne, & P. Freyberg (Eds.), Learning in science: the implications of children’s science (p. 75). London: Heinemann.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. (2002). “Mapping to know”: The effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education
White, B. Y., & Frederiksen, J. R. (1998). Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. Cognition and Instruction
Wilson, E. B., Jr. (1990). An introduction to scientific research. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
Windschitl, M. (2004). Folk theories of “inquiry:” How preservice teachers reproduce the discourse and practices of a theoretical scientific method. Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Wolpert, L. (1992). The unnatural nature of science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zichichi, A. (1999). Creativity in Science. London: World Scientific.
Zion, M., Slezak, M., Shapira, D., Link, E., Bashan, N., Brumer, M., et al. (2004). Dynamic, open inquiry in biology learning. Science Education