Adey, P., Robertson, A., & Venville, G. (2002). Effects of a cognitive acceleration programme on Year 1 pupils. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72
Adey, P., Shayer, M., & Yates, C. (1991). Better learning. A report from the Cognitive Acceleration through Science Education (CASE) project. London: Kings College, University of London.
Baird, J. R., & Mitchell, I. J. (Eds.). (1986). Improving the quality of teaching and learning: An Australian case study – The PEEL Project. Melbourne, Australia: Monash University.
Billett, S. (1996). Situated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorising. Learning and Instruction, 6
Blank, L. M. (2000). A metacognitive learning cycle: A better warranty for student understanding? Science Education, 84
Bliss, J., Morrison, I., & Ogborn, J. (1988). A longitudinal study of dynamics concepts. International Journal of Science Education, 10(1), 99–110.
Boaler, J. (1993). Encouraging the transfer of ‘school’ mathematics to the ‘real world’ through the integration of process and content, context and culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 25
Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Brown, A. L., Bransford, J. D., Ferrara, R. A., & Campione, J. C. (1983). Learning, remembering and understanding. In J. H. Flavell & E. M. Markman (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology 3 (pp. 77–166). New York: Wiley.
Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. C. (1988). Developmental and instrumental analysis of children's metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80
Department of Education and Science (DES). (1985). Science at age 15 – Science report for teachers No. 5. London: HMSO.
Detterman, D. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.). (1993). Transfer on trial: Intelligence, cognition, and instruction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
Donaldson, M. (1978). Children's minds. London: Fontana.
Donelly, J. F., & Welford, A. G. (1989). Assessing pupils' ability to generalise. International Journal of Science Education, 11, 161–171.
Engel-Clough, E., & Driver, R. (1986). A study of the consistency in the use of students' conceptual frameworks across different tasks contexts. Science Education, 70(4), 473–496.
Flavell, J. H. (1971). First discussant's comments. What is memory development the development of? Human Development, 14, 272–278.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
Flavell, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Georghiades, P. (1999). Take your class skiing! Primary Science Review, 58, 15–16.
Georghiades, P. (2000). Beyond conceptual change learning in science education: Focusing on transfer, durability and metacognition. Educational Research, 42
Georghiades, P. (2001a). Dimensions of ‘meta-Conceptual Change Learning’ in science education: The role of metacognition in the durability and contextual use of primary pupils' conceptions. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Surrey, Roehampton, England.
Georghiades, P. (2001b). ‘Situated metacognition’ and the ‘metacognitive instances’ approach: Towards the integration of metacognitive thinking into school science. In D. Psillos, P. Kariotoglou, V. Tsefles, G. Bisdikian, G. Fassoulopoulos, E. Hatzikraniotis, & M. Kallery (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Science Education in the Knowledge Based Society (pp. 392–396). Thessaloniki, Greece: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki & European Science Education Research Association.
Georghiades, P. (2002). Making children's scientific ideas more durable, Primary Science Review, 74, 24–27.
Georghiades, P. (2004). Making pupils' conceptions of electricity more durable by means of situated metacognition. International Journal of Science Education, 26
Georghiades, P., & Parla-Petrou, E. (2001, September). Diverse use of concept mapping across two domains: The cases of primary food and science education. Paper presented at the annual conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology, 12
Gunstone, R. F. (1991). Constructivism and metacognition: Theoretical issues and classroom studies. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg, & H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: Theoretical issues and empirical studies (pp. 129–140). Bremen, Germany, IPN.
Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (Eds.). (1998). Metacognition in educational theory and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1991). Beyond modularity: Innate constraints and developmental change. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind (pp. 171–197). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McKeachie, W. J. (1987). Cognitive skills and their transfer: Discussion. International Journal of Educational Research, 11
Millar, R., & Driver, R. (1987). Beyond process. Studies in Science Education, 14, 33–62.
Millar, R., & Osborne, J. (Eds.). (1998). Beyond 2000. Science education for the future. London: King's College.
Murphy, P. & Schofield, B. (1984). Science at age 13. Science report for teachers (No. 3). London: HMSO.
Nunes, T., Schliemann, A., & Carraher, D. (1993). Street mathematics and school mathematics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Palmer, D. (1993). How consistently do students use their alternative conceptions? Research in Science Education, 23
Perkins, D. N., & Salomon, G. (1989). Are cognitive skills context-bound? Educational Researcher, 18(1), 16–25.
Rogoff, B. (1984). Introduction: Thinking and learning in social context. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 1–8). London: Harvard University Press.
Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189–215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Solomon, J. (1983). Learning about energy: How pupils think in two domains. European Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 49–59.
Strike, K. A., & Posner, G. J. (1985). A conceptual change view of learning and understanding. In L. H. T. West & A. L. Pines (Eds.), Cognitive structure and conceptual change (pp. 211–231). London: Academic Press.
Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving, Journal of Educational Psychology, 82
Toh, K. A., & Woolnough, B. E. (1994). Science process skills: Are they generalisable? Research in Science and Technological Education, 12(1), 31–42.
Tytler, R. (1994). Consistency of children's use of science conceptions: Problems with the notion of ‘conceptual change.’ Research in Science Education, 24
van der Meer, F.-B., & Mastik, H. (1993). Transference to real-life contexts: Conditions for experiential learning from simulation. In F. Percival, S. Lodge, & D. Saunders (Eds.), Simulation and gaming yearbook – Developing transferable skills in education and training (Vol. 1, pp. 75–83). London: Kogan Page.