Getting on the Front Page: Organizational Reputation, Status Signals, and the Impact of U.S. News and World Report on Student Decisions
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Recent studies have suggested that a causal link exists between college rankings and subsequent admissions indicators. However, it is unclear how these effects vary across institutional type (i.e., national universities vs. liberal arts colleges) or whether these effects persist when controlling for other factors that affect admissions outcomes. Using admissions data for top-tier institutions from fall 1998 to fall 2005, we found that moving onto the front page of the U.S. News rankings provides a substantial boost in the following year’s admissions indicators for all institutions. In addition, the effect of moving up or down within the top tier has a strong impact on institutions ranked in the top 25, especially among national universities. In contrast, the admissions outcomes of liberal arts colleges—particularly those in the lower half of the top tier—were more strongly influenced by institutional prices.
- Adelman, C. (1999). Answers in the toolbox: Academic intensity, and Bachelor’s degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
- Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckman (Eds.), Action-control: From cognition to behavior (pp. 11–39). Heidelberg: Springer.
- Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Management and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211. CrossRef
- Allison, P. (2005). Fixed effects regression methods for longitudinal data using SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
- Bastedo, M. N., & Bowman, N. A. (in press). The U.S. News and World Report college rankings: Modeling institutional effects on organizational reputation. American Journal of Education.
- Bastedo, M. N., & Gumport, P. J. (2003). Access to what? Mission differentiation and academic stratification in U.S. public higher education. Higher Education, 46, 341–359. CrossRef
- Bowen, W. G., & Bok, D. (1998). The shape of the river. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Brewer, D. J., Gates, S. M., & Goldman, C. A. (2001). In pursuit of prestige: Strategy and competition in U.S. higher education. Somerset, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
- College Board. (2002). SAT-ACT score comparisons. Retrieved May 10, 2008, from http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/act-sat-concordance-tables.pdf.
- Desjardins, S. L., Ahlburg, D. A., & McCall, B. P. (2006). An integrated model of application, admission, enrollment, and financial aid. Journal of Higher Education, 77, 381–429. CrossRef
- Elsbach, K. D., & Kramer, R. M. (1996). Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Encountering and countering the Business Week rankings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 442–476. CrossRef
- Espeland, W. N., & Sauder, M. (2007). Rankings and reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 1–40. CrossRef
- Finder, A. (2007, August 17). College ratings race roars on despite concerns. New York Times. Retrieved October 6, 2008, from http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/17/education/17rankings.html.
- Frank, R. H., & Cook, P. J. (1996). The winner-take-all society. New York: Penguin.
- Garland, J. (2003). Miami University tuition plan: A solution for higher education funding? Excerpted from the 2003 State of the University Address. Oxford, OH: Miami University.
- Griffith, A., & Rask, K. (2007). The influence of the U.S. News and World Report collegiate rankings on the matriculation decision of high-ability students: 1995–2004. Economics of Education Review, 26, 244–255. CrossRef
- Gumport, P. J., & Bastedo, M. N. (2001). Academic stratification and endemic conflict: Remedial education policy at the City University of New York. Review of Higher Education, 24, 333–349. CrossRef
- Higher Education Research Institute. (2007). College rankings and college choice: How important are college rankings in students’ college choice process? Los Angeles, CA: Author.
- Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650. CrossRef
- Jencks, C., & Phillips, M. (1998). The black-white test score gap. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
- Karabel, J. (2005). The chosen. New York: Houghton Mifflin.
- Machung, A. (1998). Playing the rankings game. Change, 30(4), 12–16.
- Marklein, M. B. (2007, April 9). Race, wealth affect significance given to college rankings. USA Today. Retrieved October 3, 2007, from http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2007-04-09-college-rankings_N.htm.
- Martins, L. L. (2005). A model of the effects of reputational rankings on organizational change. Organization Science, 16, 701–720. CrossRef
- McDonough, P. M., Antonio, A. L., Walpole, M., & Perez, L. X. (1998). College rankings: Democratized college knowledge for whom? Research in Higher Education, 39, 513–537. CrossRef
- Meredith, M. (2004). Why do universities compete in the rankings game? An empirical analysis of the effects of the US News and World Report college rankings. Research in Higher Education, 45, 443–461. CrossRef
- Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363. CrossRef
- Miami University. (2008). Miami’s Ohio Scholarship program: Program specifics. Retrieved February 4, 2008, from http://www.miami.muohio.edu/ohioscholarships/specifics.cfm.
- Monks, J., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (1999). The impact of U.S. News & World Report college rankings on admissions outcomes and pricing policies at selective private institutions (Working Paper #7227). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Economic Research.
- Nettles, M. T., & Perna, L. W. (1997). The African American education data book: Volume III: The transition from school to college school to work. Washington, DC: Frederick D. Patterson Research Institute of the College Fund/UNCF.
- Olson, J. C. (1977). Price as an information cue: Effects on product evaluations. In A. G. Woodside, J. N. Sneth, & P. D. Bennett (Eds.), Consumer and industrial buying behavior (pp. 267–286). New York: North Holland.
- Pike, G. R. (2004). Measuring quality: A comparison of US News Rankings and NSSE benchmarks. Research in Higher Education, 45, 193–208. CrossRef
- Podolny, J. M. (1993). A status-based model of market competition. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 829–872. CrossRef
- Podolny, J. M. (2005). Status signals: A sociological study of market competition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Rao, H., Monin, P., & Durand, R. (2003). Institutional change in Toque Ville: Nouvelle cuisine as an identity movement in French gastronomy. American Journal of Sociology, 108, 795–843. CrossRef
- Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1033–1049. CrossRef
- Riper, T. V. (2007, January 19). America’s most expensive colleges. Forbes. Retrieved December 10, 2007, from http://www.forbes.com/2007/01/19/most-expensive-colleges-biz-cx_tvr_0119college.html.
- Rossi, L. (2007, January 23). Grinnell stuns students with unusual tuition jump. Des Moines Register. Retrieved December 13, 2007, from http://www.topcolleges.com/news32.html.
- Sauder, M. (2006). Third parties and status position: How the characteristics of status systems matter. Theory and Society, 35, 299–321. CrossRef
- Sauder, M., & Lancaster, R. (2006). Do rankings matter? The effects of U.S. News & World Report rankings on the admissions process of law schools. Law and Society Review, 40, 105–134. CrossRef
- Sauer, S. J., Thomas-Hunt, M. C., & Morris, P. A. (2008). Too good to be true? The unintended signaling effects of educational prestige on external expectations of team performance. Unpublished paper, Cornell University.
- Spence, A. M. (1974). Market signaling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Steinberg, J. (2002). The gatekeepers: Inside the admissions process of a premier college. New York: Viking.
- Stevens, M. L. (2007). Choosing a class: College admissions and the education of elites. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Thacker, L. (2005). College unranked: Ending the college admissions frenzy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- University of Richmond. (2005). University of Richmond strategic plan: A five-year status report. 2000–2005. Richmond, VA: Author.
- Volkwein, J. F., & Sweitzer, K. V. (2006). Institutional prestige and reputation among research universities and liberal arts colleges. Research in Higher Education, 47, 129–148. CrossRef
- Washington, M., & Zajac, E. J. (2005). Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 282–296.
- Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104, 1398–1438. CrossRef
- Getting on the Front Page: Organizational Reputation, Status Signals, and the Impact of U.S. News and World Report on Student Decisions
Research in Higher Education
Volume 50, Issue 5 , pp 415-436
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Organization theory
- College admissions