Anderson, J.L. 1997
The growth of salmon aquaculture and the emerging new world order of the salmon industryPikitch, E.K.Huppert, D.D.Sissenwine, M.P. eds. Global Trends: Fisheries ManagementBethesdaMD175184Google Scholar
Anferova, E., Vetemaa, M., Hannesson, R. 2004Fish quota auctions in the Russian Far East: A failed experimentMar. Policy294756Google Scholar
Arnason, R. (2005) Property Rights in Fisheries: Iceland’s Experience with ITQs. Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries. This issue.
Aswani, S. 2005Customary sea tenure in Oceania as a case of rights-based fishery management: Does it work?Rev. Fish Biol. Fisheries15263285Google Scholar
Bromley, D.W. (2002) Rights-based fishing: The wrong concept and the wrong solution for the wrong problem. In: Managing Marine Fisheries in the United States: Proceedings of the Pew Oceans Commission Workshop on Marine Fishery Management. Pew Oceans Commission, Arlington, VA.
Bromley, D.W. 2005Purging the frontier from our mind: Crafting a new fisheries policyRev. Fish Biol. Fisheries15193207Google Scholar Casey, K.E., Dewees, C.M., Turris, B.R., Wilen, J.E. 1995The effects of individual vessel quotas in the British Columbia halibut fisheryMar. Resou. Econ.10211230Google Scholar
Christy, F.T. (1973) Fisherman Quotas: A Tentative Suggestion for Domestic Management. Occasional Paper #19. Law of the Sea Institute, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI.
Christy, F.T. (1982) Territorial Use Rights in Marine Fisheries: Definitions and Conditions. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper No. 227. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.
Cole, D.H., Grossman, P.Z. 2002The meaning of property rights: Law versus economics?Land Econ.78317330Google Scholar Copes, P. 1986A critical review of the individual quota as␣a device in fisheries managementLand Econ.62278291Google Scholar Criddle, K.R., Macinko, S. 2000A requiem for the IFQ in US fisheries?Mar. Policy24461469Google Scholar Crutchfield, J.A. 1955Collective bargaining in the Pacific Coast fisheries: The economic issuesIndust. Labor Relat.854156Google Scholar Crutchfield, J.A. 1979Economic and social implications of the main policy alternatives for controlling fishing effortJ. Fisheries Res. Board Can.36742752Google Scholar Crutchfield, J.A., Zellner, A. 1962Economic aspects of the Pacific halibut fisheryFishery Indust. Res.11117Google Scholar Defeo, O., Castilla, J.C. 2005More than one bag for the world fishery crisis and keys for co-management successes in selected artisanal Latin American shellfisheriesRev. Fish Biol. Fisheries15243261Google Scholar Dupont, D., Grafton, Q. 2000Multi-species individual transferable quotas: The Scotia-Fundy mobile gear groundfisheryMar. Resou. Econ.15205220Google Scholar Exel, M., Kaufmann, B., et al. 1997
Allocation of fishing rights: Implementation issues in AustraliaPikitch, eds. Global Trends: Fisheries ManagementBethesdaMD246255Google Scholar
Gordon, H.S. 1954The economic theory of a common property resource: The fisheryJ. Political Econ.62124142CrossRefGoogle Scholar Grafton, R.Q., Squires, D., Fox, K. 2000Private property and economic efficiency: A study of a common-pool resourceJ. Law Econ.XLIII 679713Google Scholar Hannesson, R. 2004The Privatization of the OceansThe MIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar Hardin, G. 1968The tragedy of the commonsScience16212431248Google Scholar
Higgins, K. (1999) The Pacific Whiting Conservation Cooperative: As Good as IFQs? Master’s Thesis. School of Marine Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle.
Huppert, D. (2004) Partial Auctions of IFQs: A Means to Share the “Rent”. Proceedings of the Conference in Honor of Gordon Munro, University of British Columbia, July, 2004.
Huppert, D., Knapp, G. 2001
Technology and Property Rights in Fisheries ManagementAnderson, T.L.Hill, P.J. eds. The Technology of Property RightsRowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Lanham, MDGoogle Scholar
Huppert, D., Ellis, G.M., Noble, B. 1996Do Permit Prices Reflect the Discounted Value of Fishing? Evidence from Alaska’s Commercial Salmon FisheriesCan. J. Fisheries Aquat. Sci.43761768Google Scholar
Hoag, S., Peltonen, G.J. and Sadorus, L.L. (1993) Regulations of the Pacific Halibut Fishery, 1977–1992. International North Pacific Halibut Commission, Technical Report No. 27. Seattle, WA.
Johnson, R.N., Libecap, G.D. 1982Contracting problems and regulation: The case of the fisheryAm. Econ. Rev.7210051022Google Scholar Kitts, A., Edwards, S. 2003Cooperatives in US fisheries: Realizing the potential of the fishermen’s collective marketing actMar. Policy27357366Google Scholar Leal, D. 2002Fencing the Fishery: A Primer on Ending the Race for FishPERC The Center for Free Market Environmentalism. BozemanMTGoogle Scholar
Marine Fish Conservation Network (2004) Individual Fishing Quotas: Environmental, Public Trust, and Socioeconomic Impacts. Washington, DC (http://www.conservefish.org
Macinko, S. and Hennessey, T. (2002) Fishery management tools: Questions and some partial answers/thoughts. In: Managing Marine Fisheries in the United States: Proceedings of the Pew Oceans Commission Workshop on marine Fishery Management. Pew Oceans Commission, Arlington, VA.
Matulich, S.C., Mittelhammer, R.C., Reberte, C. 1996Towards a more complete model of individual transferable fishing quotas: Implications of incorporating the processing sectorJ. Environ. Econ. Manage.31112128CrossRefGoogle Scholar McCay, B.J. 1980A fishermen’s cooperative, limited: Indigenous resource management in a complex societyAnthropol. Quart.532938Google Scholar Moloney, D.G., Pearse, P.H. 1979Quantitative rights as an instrument for regulating commercial fisheriesJ. Fisheries Res. Board Can.36859866Google Scholar National Marine Fisheries Service1994The IFQ Program: Insights and UpdatesAlaska Regional Office, Restricted Access Management Division. JuneauAKGoogle Scholar
National Marine Fisheries Service (2002) Annual Report IFQ Fee (Cost Recovery) Program: Pacific Halibut and Sablefish Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program. Alaska Region, NMFS, Restricted Access Management Program. Juneau, AK.
National Research Council1999aThe Community Development Quota Program in AlaskaNational Academy PressWashington, DCGoogle Scholar National Research Council1999bSharing the Fish: Toward a National Policy on Individual Fishing QuotasNational Academy PressWashington. DCGoogle Scholar Neher, P.A.Arnason, R.Mollett, N. eds. 1989Rights Based FishingKluwer Academic PublishingDordrecht, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar Ostrom, E. 1990Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective ActionCambridge University PressCambridge, UKGoogle Scholar Ruddle, K. 1989
The organization of traditional inshore fishery management systems in the PacificNeher, P.A.Arnason, R.Mollett, N. eds. Rights Based FishingKluwer Academic PublishingDordrecht, Netherlands7385Google Scholar
Ruddle, K., Akimichi, T. 1984
Sea tenure in Japan and the southwestern RyukyusCordell, J.C. eds. A Sea of Small Boats: Customary Law and Territoriality in the World of Inshore FishingStanford University PressStanford, CAGoogle Scholar
Runolfsson, B. and Arnason, R. (2001) Initial Allocation of IQs in the Icelandic Fisheries. In Shotton, R. (ed). Case Studies on the Allocation of Transferable Quota Rights in Fisheries. Fisheries Technical Paper 411. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome, pp. 24–31.
Scott, A. 1955The fishery: The objectives of sole ownershipJ. Political Econ.63116124CrossRefGoogle Scholar Scott, A. 1989
Conceptual origins of rights based fishingNeher, P.A.Arnason, R.Mollett, N. eds. Rights Based FishingKluwer Academic PublishersDordrecht, Netherlands7385Google Scholar
Scott, A. 1993Obstacles to fishery self-governmentMarine Resource Economics8187199Google Scholar
Shotton R. (ed.) (2000) Use of property rights in fisheries management. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Fisheries Technical Paper 404/1. Rome, Italy.
Shotton, R. (ed.) (2001) Case Studies on the allocation of transferable quota rights in fisheries. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Fisheries Technical Paper 411. Rome, Italy.
Sullivan, J.M. (2002) Harvesting cooperatives and US antitrust law: Recent developments and implications. Presented at the International Institute of Fisheries Economics 2000 Conference, Microbehavior-Macroresults, Corvallis, OR, July 10–15 Online: http://www.osu.orst.edu/dept/IIFET/2000/papers/sullivan. pdf
Torres-Peña, J. 1997Political economy of fishing regulation: The case of ChileMar. Resou. Econ.12253280Google Scholar Vetemaa, M., Eero, M., Hannesson, R. 2002The Estonian fisheries: From the Soviet system to ITQs and quota auctionsMar. Policy2695102Google Scholar
Waknitz, F.W., Tynan, T.J., Nash, C.E., Iwamoto, R.N., and Rutter, L.G. (2002) Review of Potential Impacts of Atlantic Salmon Culture on Puget Sound Chinook Salmon and Hood Canal Summer-Run Chum Salmon Evolutionarily Significant Units. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo., NMFS-NWFSC-53, 83 pp.
Washington Department of Natural Resources2004DNR Annual Report 2003OlympiaWashingtonGoogle Scholar Wilen, J. 1985Towards a theory of the regulated fisheryMar. Resou. Econ.1369388Google Scholar Wilen, J., Homans, F. 1997
Unraveling rent losses in modern fisheries: Production, market, or regulatory inefficiencies?Pikitch, E.K.Huppert, D.D.Sissenwine, M.P. eds. Global Trends: Fisheries ManagementBethesdaMD256263Google Scholar