Rawls, Animals and Justice: New Literature, Same Response
- Robert Garner
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
This article seeks to revisit the relationship between Rawls’s contractarianism and the moral status of animals, paying particular attention to the recent literature. Despite Rawls’s own reluctance to include animals as recipients of justice, and my own initial scepticism, a number of scholars have argued that his theory does provide resources that are useful for the animal advocate. The first type takes Rawls’s exclusion of animals from his theory of justice at face value but argues that animals can still be protected within a moral realm independently of justice, or indirectly through the motivations of human contractors. The second type adapts his theory in a way that enables animals to be included within a contractarian theory of justice. It is argued, though, that none of the responses offered is successful in providing a sphere of protection for animals from within Rawls’s contractarian theory. It is doubtful if Rawls’s intention was for animals to receive a significant degree of protection within a moral realm independently of justice, and equally doubtful if the contractors in the original position would be motivated to act on behalf of animals. In the case of the second, whilst Rawlsian resources can be utilised to justify the attempt to amend the veil of ignorance so as to include animals, these are not dependent on a contractural agreement. Similarly, placing emphasis on social-co-operation as a means of incorporating animals into a theory of justice is flawed, not least because, paradoxically, it works for domesticated animals whilst they are being exploited.
- Abbey, Ruth. 2007. Rawlsian resources for animal ethics Ethics and the Environment, 12: 1–22.
- Barry, Brian. 1989. Theories of justice. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
- Baxter, Brian. 2005. A theory of ecological justice. London: Routledge.
- Carruthers, Peter. 1992. The animals issue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Coeckelbergh, Mark. 2009. Distributive justice and co-operation in a world of humans and non-humans: A contractarian argument for drawing non-humans into the sphere of justice. Res Publica 15: 67–84. CrossRef
- Fellenz, Marc. 2007. The moral menagerie: Philosophy and animal rights. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
- Filice, Carlo. 2006. Rawls and non-rational beneficiaries. Between the Species Issue VI. http://cla.calpoly.edu/bts/issue_06/06filice.htm.
- Garner, Robert. 2003. Animals, politics and justice: Rawlsian liberalism and the plight of non-humans. Environmental Politics 12: 3–22. CrossRef
- Garner, Robert. 2005. The political theory of animal rights. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
- Gauthier, David. 1986. Morals by agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Kymlicka, Will. 1993. The social contract tradition. In A companion to ethics, ed. Peter Singer, 186–196. Blackwell: Oxford.
- Morris, Christopher. 1998. Justice, reasons and moral standing. In Rational commitment and social justice, eds. Jules Coleman and Christopher Morris, 186–207. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Narveson, Jan. 1983. Animal rights revisited. In Ethics and animals, eds. Harlan Miller and William Williams, 45–59. Clifton: Humana Press. CrossRef
- Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, state and utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- O’Sullivan, Siobhan. 2007. Advocating for animals equally from within a liberal paradigm. Environmental Politics 16: 1–14. CrossRef
- Rawls, John. 1963. The sense of justice. The Philosophical Review 122: 281–305. CrossRef
- Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Rawls, John. 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Regan, Tom. 1984. The case for animal rights. London: Routledge.
- Richards, David. 1971. A theory of reasons for action. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Rowlands, Mark. 1997. Contractarianism and animal rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy 14: 235–247. CrossRef
- Rowlands, Mark. 1998. Animal rights: A philosophical defence. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
- Rowlands, Mark. 2009. Animal rights: Moral theory and practice, 2nd ed. Palgrave: Basingstoke.
- Sandoe, Peter, and Stine Christiansen. 2008. Ethics of animal use. Oxford: Blackwell.
- Singer, Peter. 1990. Animal liberation, 2nd ed. London: Cape.
- Vandeveer, Donald. 1979. Of beasts, persons and the original position. The Monist 62: 368–377.
- Wolff, Jonathan. 1996. An introduction to political philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Rawls, Animals and Justice: New Literature, Same Response
Volume 18, Issue 2 , pp 159-172
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Robert Garner (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK