Political Liberalism and the Interests of Children: A Reply to Timothy Michael Fowler
- Emil Andersson
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Timothy Michael Fowler has argued that, as a consequence of their commitment to neutrality in regard to comprehensive doctrines, political liberals face a dilemma. In essence, the dilemma for political liberals is that either they have to give up their commitment to neutrality (which is an indispensible part of their view), or they have to allow harm to children. Fowler’s case for this dilemma depends on ascribing to political liberals a view which grants parents a great degree of freedom in deciding on the education of their children. I show that ascribing this view to political liberals rests upon a misinterpretation of political liberalism. Since political liberals have access to reasons based upon the interests of children, they need not yield to parent’s wishes about the education of their children. A correct understanding of political liberalism thus shows that political liberals do not face the dilemma envisaged by Fowler.
- Fowler, Timothy Michael. 2010. The problems of liberal neutrality in upbringing. Res Publica 16: 367–381. CrossRef
- Rawls, John. 2005. Political liberalism: expanded edition. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Political Liberalism and the Interests of Children: A Reply to Timothy Michael Fowler
Volume 17, Issue 3 , pp 291-296
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Political liberalism
- The good
- Emil Andersson (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Philosophy, Uppsala University, Box 627, 751 26, Uppsala, Sweden