Rights Enforcement, Trade-offs, and Pluralism
- Adina Preda
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
This paper asks whether (human) rights enforcement is permissible given that it may entail infringing on the rights of innocent bystanders. I consider two strategies that adopt a rights-sensitive consequentialist framework and offer a positive answer to this question, namely Amartya Sen’s and Hillel Steiner’s. Against Sen, I argue that trade-offs between rights are problematic since they contradict the purpose of rights, which is to provide a pluralist solution to disagreement about values, i.e. to allow agents to act in accordance with their values. I further argue that Steiner’s compensation strategy does not succeed in avoiding trade-offs so it falls prey to the same criticism. I propose a non-trade-off solution that is implicit in the accounts discussed and is more consistent with the meta-ethical framework advocated by Sen. This solution relies on an enforceable duty to share in the costs of rights enforcement hence it entails a degree of redistribution for enforcement purposes.
- Caney, Simon. 1997. Diversity and the lexical priority of the right to equal freedom. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 17: 147–163. CrossRef
- Dworkin, Ronald. 1984. Rights as trumps. In Theories of rights, ed. Jeremy Waldron, 153–167. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Fabre, Cécile. 2007. Mandatory rescue killings. Journal of Political Philosophy 15: 338–363. CrossRef
- Hart, H.L.A. 1984. Are there any natural rights? In Theories of rights, ed. Jeremy Waldron, 77–91. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Nagel, Thomas. 1979. The limits of objectivity. The Tanner lectures on human values. Available at http://www.tannerlectures.utah.edu/lectures/documents/nagel80.pdf. Accessed 1 April 2011.
- Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, state and utopia. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
- Pettit, Philip. 1987. Rights, constraints and trumps. Analysis 47: 8–14. CrossRef
- Sen, Amartya. 1982. Rights and agency. Philosophy & Public Affairs 11: 3–39.
- Sen, Amartya. 1990. Welfare, freedom and social choice: a reply. Recherches Economique de Louvain 56: 451–485.
- Steiner, Hillel. 1974. The natural right to equal freedom. Mind 83: 194–210. CrossRef
- Steiner, Hillel. 1990. Putting rights in their place. Recherches Economique de Louvain 56: 391–408.
- Steiner, Hillel. 1994. An essay on rights. Oxford, UK & Cambridge, USA: Blackwell.
- Steiner, Hillel. 2008. Self-ownership and conscription. In The Egalitarian conscience: essays in honour of G.A. Cohen, ed. Christine Sypnowich, 88–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Thomson, Judith Jarvis. 1992. The realm of rights. Cambridge, MA & London, England: Harvard University Press.
- Vallentyne, Peter, Hillel Steiner, and Michael Otsuka. 2005. Why left-libertarianism is not incoherent, indeterminate, or irrelevant: a reply to Fried. Philosophy & Public Affairs 33: 201–215. CrossRef
- Waldron, Jeremy. 1981. A right to do wrong. Ethics XCII: 21–39. CrossRef
- Waldron, Jeremy (ed.). 1984. Theories of rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Rights Enforcement, Trade-offs, and Pluralism
Volume 17, Issue 3 , pp 227-243
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Conflicts of rights
- Agent-relative reasons
- Adina Preda (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. CRÉUM, Université de Montréal, CRÉUM C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville Montréal, Québec, H3C 3J7, Canada