Suffering, Sympathy, and (Environmental) Security: Reassessing Rorty’s Contribution to Human Rights Theory
First Online: 11 April 2009 Received: 01 May 2008 Accepted: 23 March 2009 DOI:
Cite this article as: Woods, K. Res Publica (2009) 15: 53. doi:10.1007/s11158-009-9083-5 Abstract
This article reassess Rorty’s contribution to human rights theory. It addresses two key questions: (1) Does Rorty sustain his claim that there are no morally relevant transcultural facts? (2) Does Rorty’s proposed sentimental education offer an adequate response to contemporary human rights challenges? Although both questions are answered in the negative, it is argued here that Rorty’s focus on suffering, sympathy, and security, offer valuable resources to human rights theorists. The article concludes by considering the idea of a dual approach to human rights, combining Rorty’s emphasis on sentiment with an analysis of patterns of responsibility for the underfulfilment of human rights.
Keywords Rorty Human rights theory Environmental security Sentimental education Solidarity References
Asad, Talal. 1997. On torture, or cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. In
Human rights, culture and context: Anthropological perspectives, ed. Richard A. Wilson, 111–133. London: Pluto Press.
Bartky, Sandra Lee. 2002.
Sympathy and solidarity and other essays. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
Berry, Christopher J. 1986.
Human nature. London: Macmillan.
Booth, Ken. 1999. Three tyrannies. In
Human rights in global politics, ed. Tim Dunne, and Nicholas J. Wheeler, 31–70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cruft, Rowan. 2005. Human rights, individualism and cultural diversity.
Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy
Dobson, Andrew. 2000.
Green political thought. London: Routledge.
Fraser, Nancy. 1990. Solidarity or singularity? Richard Rorty between romanticism and technocracy. In
Reading Rorty: Critical responses to philosophy and the mirror of nature (and beyond), ed. Alan Malachowski, 303–321. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Freeman, Michael. 1994. The philosophical foundations for human rights.
Human Rights Quarterly
Freeman, Michael. 2002.
Human rights: An interdisciplinary approach. Cambridge: Polity.
Geras, Norman. 1995.
Solidarity in the conversation of humankind: The ungroundable liberalism of Richard Rorty. London: Verso.
Gewirth, Alan. 1982.
Human rights: Essays on justification and applications. London: University of Chicago Press.
Harvey, Jean. 2007. Moral solidarity and empathetic understanding: The moral value and scope of the relationship.
Journal of Social Philosophy
Hayden, Patrick. 1999. Sentimentality and human rights: Critical remarks on Rorty.
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 6: 59–66.
Hayward, Tim. 2005. Thomas Pogge’s global resources dividend: A critique and an alternative.
Journal of Moral Philosophy
Jacobs, Michael. 1991.
The green economy. London: Pluto Press.
Langlois, Anthony J. 2003. Human rights and modern liberalism: A critique.
Mendus, Susan. 2002.
Impartiality in moral and political philosophy
. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
O’Neill, Onora. 2005. The dark side of human rights.
Pogge, Thomas. 2002.
World poverty and human rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rorty, Richard. 1989.
Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, Richard. 1993. Human rights, rationality, and sentimentality. In
On human rights: The oxford amnesty lectures 1993, ed. Stephen Shute, and Susan Hurley, 111–134. New York: Basic Books.
Rorty, Richard. 2000. Reply to Randall Peerenboom.
Philosophy East and West 50: 90–91.
Simms, Andrew. 2006.
Ecological debt. London: Pluto Press.
Woods, Kerri. 2006. What does the language of human rights bring to campaigns for environmental justice?
CrossRef Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009